• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Flag debate may be superseded (1 Viewer)

cold_mold

New member
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
A coalition of conservative groups wants Sen. Orrin Hatch's flag amendment to be superseded by the judicial nominations. In fact, they have signed a letter addressed to all Republican senators with the contention that using the Senate Floor debate for Hatch's proposed constitutional amendment is a "misguided use of time." Copy of the article can be found at Voters Domain:
http://votersdomain.com/article.php?aid=6277&tid=39
 
Your Link said:
Out of 125 conservative organization leaders surveyed, only 18 placed the flag-burning-amendment as a priority issue, but chose the judicial nominations over the flag amendment when asked to choose between the two.

LINK

Man Im glad we've resolved all the actual issues in American politics so now we can move on to the issue of flag burning.

:spin:
 
Congrats to the conservatives that realize we have more important issues.
 
Conservative politicians are just digging themselves deeper and deeper into their hole. They should do something that really matters quick or they are in more trouble than expected.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom