python416 said:I knew they would have to find a away to fix the vote to ensure ratification. Now we now how:
Changing the requirement for a province to reject the constitution from 2/3 of the vote, to 2/3 of registered voters.
The GOP are pros at this stuff - and don't bother trying to suggest it is an Iraqi issue.
They could have just let it go, get turned over on ratification, and then started over to work at a better constitution.
http://today.reuters.com/News/CrisesArticle.aspx?storyId=BAK162816
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4309164.stm
What does this do for the legitimacy of the Iraq government? Not good.
What does this do for the likelyhood of civil war (if they are not already in one)? Not good.
aps said:The GOP never ceases to amaze me.This kind of vote would be unheard of here.
Canuck said:Where are the filthy war mongers when you need then !
hiding after the fact ,as ussual.
python416 said:I knew they would have to find a away to fix the vote to ensure ratification. Now we now how:
Changing the requirement for a province to reject the constitution from 2/3 of the vote, to 2/3 of registered voters.
The GOP are pros at this stuff - and don't bother trying to suggest it is an Iraqi issue.
They could have just let it go, get turned over on ratification, and then started over to work at a better constitution.
http://today.reuters.com/News/CrisesArticle.aspx?storyId=BAK162816
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4309164.stm
What does this do for the legitimacy of the Iraq government? Not good.
What does this do for the likelyhood of civil war (if they are not already in one)? Not good.
python416 said:Looks like they chickened out and reversed their decision.
Now they are gonna have fix this election the ol' fashion ways. And after showing their intentions, it is only gonna make the outcome more questionable.
Stupidity; par for the course.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=1185434
cnredd said:Not only will I SUGGEST it...I will show it to you in YOUR OWN ARTICLE!
.
.
.
How 'bout that?...They went AGAINST what the "GOP" had wanted...
Another swing and a miss...By now, I guess you'd hope SOMETHING sticks...:roll:
cnredd said:So they're going to do it the way GOP appointed Paul Bremer originally wrote it up...
What a conspiracy...:roll:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?