• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fitton on Uranium One Indictment: DOJ Must 'Aggressively' Investigate Clintons & Russia

Blkdirt Farmer

Banned
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
696
Reaction score
192
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Oh looky here, an indictment in the Uranium one scandal. :2wave:

The Clintons had better make sure any evidence was burnt at their NY home last week...

The noose it tightening around the Clintons. My bet is they are charged before this is over. That foundation is dirty and everybody knows it.

Fitton on Uranium One Indictment: DOJ Must 'Aggressively' Investigate Clintons & Russia | Fox News Insider

"There's tens of millions of dollars that were laundered by Russians into the Clinton operation that needs to be thoroughly investigated in order for the American people to rest assured that our uranium industry hasn't been compromised," said Fitton on "Fox & Friends."
Hillary Clinton has repeatedly denied the allegations surrounding the uranium deal and the foundation, calling the allegations of impropriety "baloney."
"Let’s call this what it is: A sham," Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said earlier this month. "This is a philanthropy that does life-changing work, which Republicans have tried to turn into a political football."
Fitton said the Obama administration knew of the "bribery-kickback schemes that are endemic in Russia" when the deal was allowed to go through.*
He said the Justice Department must "aggressively" investigate all of these matters and their connections to Hillary Clinton.

Sarah Carter Reports on Uranium One Indictment and More! - YouTube

URANIUM 1 indictments starting to be unsealed heres the first - YouTube

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...ount-indictment-involving-uranium-one-scandal
 
Last edited:

Funny how that fire started all by itself.

They should do a “stormtrooper” search and sieze like they did to Mananforte.
 
chuckiechan said:
Funny how that fire started all by itself.

They should do a “stormtrooper” search and sieze like they did to Mananforte.
Click to expand...

There is a reason some of those emails were destroyed on purpose.
 
I'm reading the article that spawned this at the New York Post. While the Post says the investigation that resulted in Lambert's indictment "grew from charges that the Obama administration covered up an FBI probe of the uranium business from the Uranium One investigation," in no way can I discern from the article what it has to do with the original Uranium One issue, let alone how it in any way connects to Clinton or Obama. Maybe I'm wrong, but the Uranium One investigation appears to be working down the food chain rather than up it.

Edit: on second read, it's not even working down a food chain. Rather, it appears to be dealing with an entirely separate person and with different companies.

https://nypost.com/2018/01/13/exec-charged-with-bribing-russian-official-in-uranium-deal/
 

Considering that the person interviewed in the op is the president of judicial watch, I don’t think we can assume that there are any indictments involving clinton.
 
I really wish the Trumpists would drop this Clinton crap. Claiming to be against the opposition whilst simultaneously supporting one of the most corrupt Presidents of the United States that we've ever seen...
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Considering that the person interviewed in the op is the president of judicial watch, I don’t think we can assume that there are any indictments involving clinton.
Click to expand...

I knew going into this that it would be biased as hell, but even when you track it down to a "respectable" source (the New York Post, and that sure ain't respectable), it's still complete gibberish.

The essence of the story so far as I can tell is, "Once upon a time there was a company called Uranium One. Oh, and Hillary Clinton. Also, here's an entirely separate company and some guy named Mark Lambert bribed them and, uh....[long, awkward silence]...did I say 'Hillary Clinton' already?"
 
Last edited:
Abbazorkzog said:
I really wish the Trumpists would drop this Clinton crap. Claiming to be against the opposition whilst simultaneously supporting one of the most corrupt Presidents of the United States that we've ever seen...
Click to expand...

Really what has he done?
So far there is no evidence he has done anything.
 
Abbazorkzog said:
I really wish the Trumpists would drop this Clinton crap. Claiming to be against the opposition whilst simultaneously supporting one of the most corrupt Presidents of the United States that we've ever seen...
Click to expand...

And I really wish ass hurt Democrats would drop this Trump crap. Claiming to be against the oppositions whilst simultaneously supporting one of the most corrupt politicians to ever run for President.

Damn that works good! :lamo
 
Blkdirt Farmer said:
And I really wish ass hurt Democrats would drop this Trump crap. Claiming to be against the oppositions whilst simultaneously supporting one of the most corrupt politicians to ever run for President.

Damn that works good! :lamo
Click to expand...

Nice try, but I've been one of the most outspoken Anti-Clinton members of this board. As a libertarian I cannot bring myself to support an authoritarian like Donald Trump.
 
Abbazorkzog said:
Nice try, but I've been one of the most outspoken Anti-Clinton members of this board. As a libertarian I cannot bring myself to support an authoritarian like Donald Trump.
Click to expand...

Well at least you know enough to know better than to vote for any Clinton. I commend you for that fine sir! :mrgreen:

You have to admit both sides arguments are rather tiresome.... :2wave:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…