He should have to pay nothing to the Federal government for grazing that land. Why does the NATIONAL government need to own 1/2 the land in the STATE of Nevada?
Henrin is an anarchist ... I kind of like that level of extremism in a weird way ... except he won't admit it.Why even have a government? Screw it, let's be Somalia.
.....but, only if it is something you agree with right?
phony!
Why even have a government? Screw it, let's be Somalia.
Yeah, pretty much. The government has no business owning airports, parks, wildlife preserves, colleges, schools, and the military should not exist in it's current form.
The only task of the government is uphold the rights of the people. The only thing you listed that does anything towards that is the military, but that is more of the exception than the rule. I much prefer the militia model over the current military model.
You go girl!No, sedition has no reason to be a crime.
Does that include the right of people to bilk a free ride by grazing their cattle wherever they damn well please?
The overwhelming sentiment I'm getting from the anti-government voices here is that government, in any and all forms, is illegitimate. They are advocating for anarchy.
If the land is not privately owned it should be free to use by anyone who wants to.
No, sedition has no reason to be a crime.
Does that include the right of people to bilk a free ride by grazing their cattle wherever they damn well please?
BINGO!The overwhelming sentiment I'm getting from the anti-government voices here is that government, in any and all forms, is illegitimate. They are advocating for anarchy.
Ok ...Let's play your silly game.If the land is not privately owned it should be free to use by anyone who wants to.
If the land is not privately owned it should be free to use by anyone who wants to.
Just admit that you are committed to the ideology of anarchy Henrin.Who cares where they graze their animals? I don't.
If it isn't my property I can't even begin to imagine why I would care.
Ok ...Let's play your silly game.
Let's say everyone else wants to use the land for cattle grazing ... but I want to grow cranberries. F**k em!
I should be free to divert a river dig out all the bog ditches and flood the land right? If it's free land and I have the liberty and the means, I should be able to do that on public land, right?
Roads are obviously so complicated only government can build them. Wait...they don't build them now. All they really do is tax people to pay the people that actually build them. Hmm..
Yes, they do. Get on an interstate, or a freeway or a highway.
You want to freeload, in your utopia, nothing will ever be built.
Move. Seriously, leave my country, you have no future here, and you won't be happy.
Go build a libertarian utopia.
Elsewhere.
Who told you the people and the government are the same group? Did you learn that in public school perhaps? :lamo
Should I be allowed to burn down Olympia National Rainforest because I think it'd look cool?If the land is not privately owned it should be free to use by anyone who wants to.
oh dear do I really need to explain basic Americanism to you?
The Government is entirely staffed by Americans. Those public servants work for us Americans. The BLM isnt staffed by a mysterious Government population, its staffed by ordinary Americans no differently than the military the US border Patrol etc. Those ****ed up militia asses were threatening to shoot ordinary working Americans.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?