• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Feds bust child porn 'social networking site'

True but could it not be argued that some folks will still get off on works like When the Rabbit Howls-which makes it child porn even if that was not the intent?

Indeed - which is why, when anything is in question, it is left up to a trial - evidence, jury and judge - to decide things.
 
True but could it not be argued that some folks will still get off on works like When the Rabbit Howls-which makes it child porn even if that was not the intent?

I'd say that most enthusiasts of the so-called "True Crime" genre (including accounts of "Satanic ritual abuse" and "recovered memories" of past abuse, so ubiquitous during the '80s as to be almost a genre unto itself; at the very least, a subgenre) are almost undoubtedly "getting off on" these accounts one way or the other- sexually or otherwise.
They are gore-porn for the prurient.

Even so- even if most readers are teenage boys who are getting off on accounts of torture and violence, on ten-page-long graphic descriptions of autopsies, on the twenty page insert of photos... does this influence them to become serial killers themselves?
Not in any case I've ever heard of.
I doubt it causes anyone to molest a child, either, even if they thoroughly enjoy reading about children being sexually tortured.
 
Last edited:
I don't think it's bizarre at all.
There are tons of pictures of me without clothes from when I was a little kid in our family albums.
I also have pictures of my sons unclothed, playing in the sprinkler outside (these are from last year. haha, just kidding. They were toddlers).
Also naked baby pictures.

I like these pictures. They help me remember what we looked like then.
I love every part of my children, and every part of myself as well.
There is nothing wrong, nasty, shameful, sinful, evil, or perverted about the human body in its natural state.
I was not brought up to believe there is, nor did I bring my children up that way.

One of my very fav pics of me and my mom is a pic of me naked as baby laying on her nude chest skin to skin. There is nothing sexual nor dirty about it. Just a lovely pic.

My parents also have pics of me in tub, outside in kidding pool nude as baby. It nothing wrong with it. Heck there is even one pic of me with my dad taking a bubble bath. *gasp*
 
Aunt Spiker, I totally understand where you are coming from here in this thread and there is nothing I hate worse than pedophiles! I really do understand what you mean about the pics and you know I even have a hard time with parents postings those like glam shots, etc. of their children clothed on the web cause you just do not know what scumbag is looking at them and also some of these parents post so much private info that it would be easy for a pedohile freak to find their child:( Getting offtopic but I do see what you are saying.
 
One of my very fav pics of me and my mom is a pic of me naked as baby laying on her nude chest skin to skin. There is nothing sexual nor dirty about it. Just a lovely pic.

My parents also have pics of me in tub, outside in kidding pool nude as baby. It nothing wrong with it. Heck there is even one pic of me with my dad taking a bubble bath. *gasp*

The last thing I needed as a child was to know that the people who molested me were also invited to view these very 'innocent photos' - sure, my parents taking them and having them wasn't wrong - this was quite innocent. But I knew what was in the minds of other people, which is why I made an effort to take them all and burn them.

As is always brought up - my childhood is the very reason why I'm a staunch advocate against child abuse of all types.
 
Last edited:
It's still up and they'll just shut the site down before telling us the name.

By sharing the name it would almost be like inviting someone to view the very thing they're trying to stop.
 
So, every time child porn is mentioned it needs to include the adjective "actual" in order for you to not create alternate meanings in order to have an anti-government angle to argue from?
You say anti-government like it's some kind of insult...
 
There's a time and place to play the Devil's Advocate - when it comes to Child Porn freaks that's NOT it.
I agree - laws criminalizing motion and still images, drawings and/or stories are too lame to be worth defending even for the hell of it.
 
Last edited:
You say anti-government like it's some kind of insult...

No. I say anti-government because all of Ikari's posts have to be anti-government, thus that is the angle that Ikari debates from. :roll:
 
No. I say anti-government because all of Ikari's posts have to be anti-government, thus that is the angle that Ikari debates from. :roll:

I'm not anti-government. That's a term you've tried to apply in order to catagorize me into a box that you think you can better handle. But the truth is, I'm not anti-government. I have never once advocated the total dismantling of all government without any plan of replacement. Sorry if you can't understand something like that; but what I am is anti-bad government. As I have continually called for the proper pressure and restriction to be placed upon the government and any and all abuse of power on the part of the government to be severely and immediately punished. You seem to like to try to throw me into a box, but if you're going to do so at least get the correct one.
 
Back
Top Bottom