• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Federal Reserve approves first interest rate hike in more than three years, sees six more ahead

Chomsky

Social Democrat
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
80,708
Reaction score
67,151
Location
Third Coast
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
After keeping its benchmark interest rate anchored near zero since the beginning of the Covid pandemic, the policymaking Federal Open Market Committee said it will raise rates by a quarter percentage point, or 25 basis points.

That will bring the rate now into a range of 0.25%-0.5%. The move will correspond with a hike in the prime rate and immediately send financing costs higher for many forms of consumer borrowing and credit.

--

It's begun!

Only a quarter point initial raise, which strikes me as quite modest given the inflation & economy.

Perhaps, the Fed is cautious due to the hike being a reversal after a long period of decreasing & a virtually zero rate?
 
True.

But, I'd argue it was a tough read!
Maybe, but I read no shortage of articles, particularly in the WSJ, last year that were arguing against the Fed's "this inflation is transitory" logic.

In fact, if you recall, last year the Fed even adjusted their own benchmarks that would have triggered rate increases. In other words, the Fed not only ignored calls from industry analysts, they ignored their own internal guidelines in order to keep rates low.

That's hubris.
 


--

It's begun!

Only a quarter point initial raise, which strikes me as quite modest given the inflation & economy.

Perhaps, the Fed is cautious due to the hike being a reversal after a long period of decreasing & a virtually zero rate?
Did you get a target rate for the end of the rate hikes?
 
Long overdue. They completely misread the economy and are about a year late.
Maybe, let's see what the impact of the Russian imperialism looks like in 6 months.
 
Maybe, but I read no shortage of articles, particularly in the WSJ, last year that were arguing against the Fed's "this inflation is transitory" logic.

In fact, if you recall, last year the Fed even adjusted their own benchmarks that would have triggered rate increases. In other words, the Fed not only ignored calls from industry analysts, they ignored their own internal guidelines in order to keep rates low.

That's hubris.
Do you understand what is meant by transitory inflation? It doesn't mean temporary, it means caused by something that is temporary (and that temporary status can last quite some time). Imo, one thing the fed was describing is the inflationary aspect of supply chain issues.
 
Do you understand what is meant by transitory inflation? It doesn't mean temporary, it means caused by something that is temporary (and that temporary status can last quite some time). Imo, one thing the fed was describing is the inflationary aspect of supply chain issues.
And do you understand by their actions today they now admit they were wrong?
 
Did you get a target rate for the end of the rate hikes?


RTFM! :p

Along with the rate hikes, the committee also penciled in rate hikes at each of the six remaining meetings this year, pointing to a consensus funds rate of 1.9% by year’s end. The committee sees three more hikes in 2023 then none the following year.
 
Maybe, but I read no shortage of articles, particularly in the WSJ, last year that were arguing against the Fed's "this inflation is transitory" logic.

In fact, if you recall, last year the Fed even adjusted their own benchmarks that would have triggered rate increases. In other words, the Fed not only ignored calls from industry analysts, they ignored their own internal guidelines in order to keep rates low.

That's hubris.

Quite honestly, I think they took a calculate risk to play it safe in providing adequate stimulus - given the fears & dangers of pandemic induced recession.
 
And do you understand by their actions today they now admit they were wrong?
There are always cycles. Only the results of their actions will determine if they made a mistake. I'll take their actions over your words.
 
Quite honestly, I think they took a calculate risk to play it safe in providing adequate stimulus - given the fears & dangers of pandemic induced recession.
I don't question their motives, but the fed leadership are folks who are paid a great deal of money to do a very important job. This is not a league where we should hand out participation trophies. In short, they've botched it, and there are many people -- in particular many low income people -- who are going to feel the pain from this. Inflation is a bit like a boulder rolling down a hill. The Fed's first shove was easy enough to do; slowing it down is quite another matter.

FWIW, I found this article in reference to my point above. This WSJ columnist certainly called the shot (note the publication date):

A Flexible Fed Means Higher Inflation​

By James Mackintosh
Aug. 30, 2020 10:00 am ET

The Federal Reserve has just given itself a license to do pretty much whatever it wants.

Chairman Jerome Powell will no doubt disagree: His speech on Thursday set out a new target for average inflation of 2%. But because he ruled out any mathematical definition of the average, anything from serious deflation up to inflation of 3.2% over the next five years could count as success.

This isn’t really a problem. The broad thrust of the Fed’s new strategy is that it will be even more dovish, and interest rates will stay low for even longer. But—and it is a vital point—what the Fed is really saying is that we should trust that it won’t let inflation spiral out of control, so any overshoots of 2% won’t last long. The Fed wants people to believe inflation will be roughly 2% in the long run, and more precision than that isn’t really necessary.

Those who prefer their monetary policy to be governed by rules will be disappointed. The Fed used to let bygones be bygones, ignoring what had happened to inflation in the past as it pursued its goal of 2% in future. A catch-up strategy means that the failure to hit 2% for most of the past decade could be used to justify inflation above 2% for most of the next decade. The lack of a firm rule, though, means Mr. Powell isn’t tied to having to compensate for any future period above 2% by running below that for a while afterward.

Mr. Powell says the new approach is flexible. He isn’t kidding. Choose your period, and almost anything can be justified. Since 1960, inflation has averaged 3.2% (using the mathematically correct geometric, or compound, average of the Fed’s preferred inflation measure). A hawk applying a strict policy of inflation averaging could justify aiming for deflation for years to bring the long-term average back down to 2%. Some bygones will still be ignored.

The same mathematical problem bedevils what might appear to be more reasonable approaches. Should the average apply since the Fed adopted its target in 2012? Since Mr. Powell took over in 2018? Since five years ago? There is no correct answer, and the results are different enough to be significant for policy: Start from 2012, and the next five years need inflation of 3.2% to bring the average up to the goal. Start from Mr. Powell’s appointment, and it needs to be 2.3%, while starting five years ago would require inflation of 2.5%.

...
Source: here (paywall)
 
There are always cycles. Only the results of their actions will determine if they made a mistake. I'll take their actions over your words.
They've already made the mistake, any we've only begun to start paying for it.

And these are not just my words. See post 12.
 
True.

But, I'd argue it was a tough read!
I think they're going to need to bump it at least one more time, given the massive PPI and CPI increases we've seen.
Where Paul Volcker when we need him? :lol:
 
I think they're going to need to bump it at least one more time, given the massive PPI and CPI increases we've seen.
Where Paul Volcker when we need him? :lol:

In my article, Fed is claiming 3 more increases this year, to around 1.9%, then 3 more increases next year.

I'm very surprised by only a 1/4 pt bump, TBH.
 
In my article, Fed is claiming 3 more increases this year, to around 1.9%, then 3 more increases next year.

I'm very surprised by only a 1/4 pt bump, TBH.
Yeah, I saw that. I posted something a while back encouraging the Fed to adopt a Quantitative Tightening similar to the QE they've been following since the Dawn of Time.
 
To me, this just seems a lot like controlling reactor power. You try to go slow and make sure you limit how many things are causing it to change at the same time, as that compounds what is happening and can make it very difficult to control, allow it to get out of control easily.
 
In my article, Fed is claiming 3 more increases this year, to around 1.9%, then 3 more increases next year.

I'm very surprised by only a 1/4 pt bump, TBH.
That’s the “putting the frog in the pot of cold water and slowly turning up the heat” strategy.
 


--

It's begun!

Only a quarter point initial raise, which strikes me as quite modest given the inflation & economy.

Perhaps, the Fed is cautious due to the hike being a reversal after a long period of decreasing & a virtually zero rate?
Long overdue, and I mean more than a decade overdue. Rates should have been going up at the end of Obama's first term, and all through the second as well as tRump's first few years. Then they could have been lowered when Covid hit and been on their way back up by now.
 
I've been very lucky with interest rates. First I consolidated my student loans at a time of low interest rate and have a 3% interest rates

And I lucked out I bought my house a year and a half ago also with low interest rates and secured at 3.2%. Also got a low rate on my solar panels (on top of the tax credit), although that cost pretty much equals what I would be paying for power without it, and I'm not emboldened to ever increasing energy rates

There are many people getting robbed by high rates on student loans and mortgages
 
Do you understand what is meant by transitory inflation? It doesn't mean temporary, it means caused by something that is temporary (and that temporary status can last quite some time). Imo, one thing the fed was describing is the inflationary aspect of supply chain issues.
Inflation is NOT transitory, only the rate of inflation is transitory.
 


--

It's begun!

Only a quarter point initial raise, which strikes me as quite modest given the inflation & economy.

Perhaps, the Fed is cautious due to the hike being a reversal after a long period of decreasing & a virtually zero rate?
1648110780618.png
 
Back
Top Bottom