- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
- Messages
- 36,853
- Reaction score
- 13,735
- Location
- Florida The Armband State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Okay, so same stuff. Did you know that the Neanderthals died out because they were unable to adapt and learn? Just kept doing the same stuff, again and again...
There's what MI did by the end of last month and then there's this ...
Now, you normally MIGHT think that Obama's Federal Court appointee should have just let the Michigan Courts decide the recount issue but after all, he IS Obama's Federal Court appointee and Stein wouldn't have asked just any old Justice.
Especially since she's trying to get 2 Republican appointees to recuse themselves from hearing the State case to stop the recount.
This is a 3rd recent example of Federal and State laws in conflict.
The other 2 are the marijuana & sanctuary city laws.
Yes ... this is the kind of mess that happens when an ideology thinks of itself as an entitled entity of destiny.
False accusation that has nothing to do with the thread or topic.
Personal attack.
Accuse accuse accuse.
Attack attack attack.
Personalize everything.
All that prattle that has nothing to do with the post I made or the post I quoted.
Reread your first paragraph then reread your post 263
The thread is about the recount, not about Neanderthal nor the initiator of the thread...at least not obsessively or almost exclusively. Cro Magnon had only one focus too.
It's your integrity that is at risk. It doesn't mean anything to me. Do what you want. I am just trying to help.
Wow, you really do like to do the same thing over and over. I didn't know how dead on I was!:2razz:
Braindead.
Give directions, orders and instructions to someone else plse thx.
And given the focus of the Faux and Breitbart Right Sector is on me, then you yourself would need to quote the post(s).
If the focus of the Right Sector were on the recount in Michigan thread topic, then we could discuss the recount in Michigan.
Oh, come on.
ALL elections should be on hand-written, paper ballots counted by hand in the open.
I am the judge of who or whether another may be suggesting help or something else, not you. Especially from those who initiate their solicitous and bogus offers of 'help'.
The post is presumptuous, overbearing, cynical. Which is nothing new from over there. The consequence has always been that my posts to youse guyz of the extreme Right Sector are rightfully dismissive -- outright.
Always, and deservedly so, in the absolute.
Let's rather discuss the recount. That is, unless youse cannot.
Intentional ignorance noted.
So, hows the recount going?
Finding any EVIDENCE of the FRAUD you kept rambling about?
brain dead is thinking that those pushing these recounts are anything other than sore losers who are trying to disqualify a state's slates of electors by extending this nonsense past the safe harbor date. Fortunately the shenanigans of Bugsy Daily and the DNC vote stealing ring in Florida, circa December 2000-have educated most courts about the safe harbor provisions that were jeopardized when the dems tried to extend the contest period and then shorten the protest period
Again, you'd need to quote my posts that you arbitrarily pronounce out of the blue present a problem to you.
Ordering me to reread certain of my posts then to get back to you, presumably after having learned some right wing lessons is absurd, assinine [sic] overbearing -- classic Breitbart and Faux among others. You reference the post numbers while failing to quote them as you use the Brietbart model of headline writing.
Oh my, another sore winner.
So, the recounts. How have they gone so far?
Very well as clarifying events.
Now if the federal judge would order a recount in Pennsylvania we might get a more complete picture either way.
Good to see you back on topic at the thread btw. I note the historic date and time, month/day.
And yet another post not acknowledging every recount so far is going Trumps way.
I am the judge of who or whether another may be suggesting help or something else, not you. Especially from those who initiate their solicitous and bogus offers of 'help'.
The post is presumptuous, overbearing, cynical. Which is nothing new from over there. The consequence has always been that my posts to youse guyz of the extreme Right Sector are rightfully dismissive -- outright.
Always, and deservedly so, in the absolute.
Let's rather discuss the recount. That is, unless youse cannot.
You missed my post saying the recounts are going very well as clarifying events and that I hope the federal judge in Pennsylvania orders a recount there to further clarify the matter.
Or maybe you're ignoring it in favor of some kind of insistence if not demand the Clinton supporters sign on now to the Trump cause (whatever that is). Hard however to sign up to the Trump Cause when even Trump doesn't know what he's in for domestically and globally or how he's going to manage it.
Not a chance of signing on to begin with anyway. (Although I as with many others welcome Trump's swift kicking of the CCP Dictators in Beijing.)
The Latest: Michigan Court Says Stein Can't Seek Recount
By The Associated Press
PHILADELPHIA — Dec 6, 2016, 8:01 PM ET
The Latest on the presidential recount efforts in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (all times local):
7:40 p.m.
The Michigan appeals court says Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein has no right to seek a recount in the state because of her fourth-place finish in the Nov. 8 election.
The court ordered the Michigan election board to reject her recount petition. It's unclear how this would affect the recount, which began on Monday.
The appeals court ruled in favor of Republican Donald Trump and the state attorney general, who argued that Stein is not an "aggrieved" candidate under Michigan law because she can't win the state with a recount.
Attorney General Bill Schuette says the recount now "must stop." But Stein's attorney, Mark Brewer, says the recount still isn't over. He pointed to a Monday decision by a federal judge who accelerated the process.
———
The Latest: Michigan Court Says Stein Can't Seek Recount - ABC News
The recount will never be completed. But the recount wasn't the goal anyway.
We agree.
Amazing that the OP actually does not want to talk about the recounts any more.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?