If only the judge could have ordered Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder to attend as well.Lol......Lying DOJ attorneys have been ordered to undergo 3 hours of ethics training annually if they ever want to practice and or appear in any of the 26 States that that are part of the lawsuit against Obama's immigration over reach
Obama's legacy will read like the legacy of your average tin pot dictator
Judge orders ethics classes for 'deceptive' DOJ attorneys | Washington Examiner
He also ensured that the out-of-state attorneys involved in this incident would not be practicing in Texas again any time soon.
“The Court does not have the power to disbar counsel in this case, but it does have the power to revoke the pro hac vice status of out-of-state attorneys who act unethically in court. By a seperate sealed order … that is being done,” Hanen wrote.
Lol......Lying DOJ attorneys have been ordered to undergo 3 hours of ethics training annually if they ever want to practice and or appear in any of the 26 States that that are part of the lawsuit against Obama's immigration over reach
Obama's legacy will read like the legacy of your average tin pot dictator
Judge orders ethics classes for 'deceptive' DOJ attorneys | Washington Examiner
Good.
But government attorneys misbehaving is nothing new. Obama couldn't have done it, unless he used the same time machine he used to plant his birth announcements in old newspapers from Hawaii.
Do you think anyone in charge should be held accountable for this?
Alcoholics normally take such a class with a recovering alcoholic. Maybe they could have Bill Clinton teach the course for the attorneys.
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.
The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.
"Apparently, lawyers, somewhere in the halls of the Justice Department whose identities are unknown to this court, decided unilaterally that the conduct of the DHS in granting three-year DACA renewals using the 2014 DHS directive was immaterial and irrelevant to this lawsuit and that the DOJ could therefore just ignore it," Hanen wrote. "Then, for whatever reason, the Justice Department trial lawyers appearing in this Court chose not to tell the truth about this DHS activity. The first decision was certainly unsupportable, but the subsequent decision to hide it from the Court was unethical."
If they lied to the court as advocates, and it sounds like they did, the judge should have slapped them with sanctions and the relevant BBOs should determine their own punishment. The court notes that it lacked jurisdiction to disbar the attorneys, BUT that doesn't mean the court cannot communicate to the board(s) of bar overseers with jurisidiction over the various attorneys.
If they lied to the court in testimony as witnesses, and it doesn't sound like they did, then they would deserve perjury charges.
And of course, the misconduct should be traced as far as investigation will take it, by the next admin if necessary.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1065884929 said:Hillary Clinton would be a good candidate as well. Just ask Jerry Zeifman.
Hillary Clinton fired for lies, unethical behavior
Μολὼν λαβέ;1065884929 said:Hillary Clinton would be a good candidate as well. Just ask Jerry Zeifman.
Hillary Clinton fired for lies, unethical behavior
False, and has been debunked many times. You read way too many chain emails. LOL.
Is Hillary Clinton a snake? Yup. Was she fired from the Watergate Commission? Nope.
“Zeifman does not have flattering memories of Rodham’s work on the committee. ‘If I had the power to fire her, I would have fired her,’ he said.
Zeifman said Rodham sparked a bitter battle among Democrats by recommending the Judiciary Committee deny Nixon’s lawyers the right to attend the closed-door meetings.
‘Can you imagine that? This was a committee of lawyers and members of the bar, and she was saying the committee should deny the president representation,’ he said.
After a lengthy behind-the-scenes debate, Zeifman said the committee decided Nixon’s lawyers could attend.”
In an interview on the Neal Boortz Show in 2008, Jerry Zeifman altered his claim about Hillary’s termination from the Watergate investigation:
“Well, let me put it this way: I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were — were no longer needed, and advised her that I would not — could not — recommend her for any further positions.”
When pressed, Zeifman said he couldn’t recommend Hillary Rodham Clinton for future positions, “Because of her unethical conduct.” Despite that, however, Clinton was terminated because she was “no longer needed” — not because she had lied, according to Zeifman’s own account.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?