• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Federal court upholds President's authority (1 Viewer)

Little-Acorn

Banned
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
216
Reaction score
5
Location
San Diego
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Here's a rare headline.

We need a few more judicial appointments, of more people who believe the Constitution is something to be obeyed rather than evaded, to make headlines like this more common.

-------------------------------

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/8/24/151655.shtml?s=lh

Federal Court Uphold President's Authority

Friday, Aug. 25, 2006

A federal appeals court Thursday upheld the president's authority to regulate financial transactions with foreign countries during a security crisis and rejected a challenge by a man prosecuted for sending $100,000 into Iraq.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the first President Bush made proper use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act after Iraq invaded Kuwait in August 1990.

The court rejected a claim that invoking the act unfairly let the president create new criminal offenses that should only be authorized by Congress.

In an opinion explaining their decision, the judges said Congress has the authority to delegate some of its power to the president, especially in matters of foreign affairs, and noted that in a similar case, the Supreme Court upheld the president's power to criminalize the sale of weapons to certain countries.
 
Damn activist judges! We gotta get 'em out of there! Now they're saying the president has the power to pass laws.
 
Personally I don't see what the big deal was about with this case. The man sent money that would normally have been looked at and scrutinized and he did it in a time of hostility with that country. No kidding he did wrong.

I hardly think this is an activist judge sort of situation as well, mainly since is this such a non issue anyways what does it matter? The court basically said that the gov't has the right to prossecute somebody for transering money to our enemies in large quantities during times of hostility. Kinda a no brainer.
 
Iriemon said:
Damn activist judges! We gotta get 'em out of there! Now they're saying the president has the power to pass laws.

President Bush is going to protect in spite of yourself......;)
 
You did notice this was regarding an action taken by the first President Bush?
 
Iriemon said:
Damn activist judges! We gotta get 'em out of there! Now they're saying the president has the power to pass laws.


Why do you make that claim? It was a law passed by congress and entered into the US Code

International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”)
UNITED STATES CODE
TITLE 50. WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
CHAPTER 35. INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY ECONOMIC POWERS

The Judges was doing exactly as judges are suppose to do, uphold the laws passed by the congress.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom