The Citation is wrong.
I disagree with it because the facts are on my side.
Yes, I would assume that you'd take the left's spin as fact. Doesn't make them facts.
The "other half of the story" is already and has long been revealed. I know, having mentioned this previously, I read and took the OP's ""article"" tore it apart and tested it against facts from a myriad of sources and found the OP's ""article"" to be, essentially, sensationalized garbage ""reporting"".
Please point to where you 'tore it apart'. Perhaps you can point out non-left sources which support your take on it. Do keep in this that this is the same administration which tried to foist a
'disinformation' board' with federal powers, which since has moved to DHS for silent implementation (see my post below).
Simple. You take what JTN's writers wrote in the OP's article, the claims and the rhetoric all the bits and pieces and you do background on them from a host of other media outlets, first person sources, available records etc.. You winnow the wheat from the chaff, as it were, and that is what I did. Mind you the OP's linked ""article"" would seem wholly legitimate to someone who is uninterested in going into what was said there, but I am not that sort of person. I could read the piece to its end and see the red flags in the piece that made me go, "Hmmm?" So I went in search to verify the OP's linked ""article"" for veracity, it failed the test.
This 'winnow the wheat from the chaff' sure sounds like cherry picking the points you want to believe, rather than the truth.
Has the big tech suppression of the Hunter Laptop Story not brought anything to light for you? That 'Big Tech' regularly censors speech they politically 'don't like'?
What of all the social media posts of credentialed people with differing view points on mandatory COVID vaccinations, the COVID vaccine, and the mere discussion of possible alternative treatments?
All that simply pass you by unnoticed by you?
Believe me I learned a lot on my quest. Sadly for the OP I also learned that the OMG of their Thread was needless as the JTN piece was flat out garbage.
Meh. Rather unsurprising that you'd call the conservative perspective that, and hold the liberal perspective the unquestioned gold source, but what do you expect when you view the world through liberal Kantian 'Rose Colored Glasses'?
Me? I'm rather skeptical by nature.
My first instinct is to ask 'What's in it for you?' (follow the money), once that's figured out, pretty much everything else easily falls into place.
In the COVID example, all you have to take a look at is where the money is flowing (big pharma and ill-conceived and unwise gain of function research) with Fauci pocketing some millions in the process, but only after sharing it with one of which buddies.