• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

FEC finds Frist violated law by failing to disclose $1.4 million personal loan (1 Viewer)

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,257
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Oops, another day, another instance of GOP corruption and lawbreaking. The FEC has determined that Frist broke campaign finance laws.

Article is here.
 
danarhea said:
Oops, another day, another instance of GOP corruption and lawbreaking. The FEC has determined that Frist broke campaign finance laws.

Article is here.

Interesting. Surprised? Nope.

I want to see the SEC find that Frist violated the rules against insider trading.
 
aps said:
Interesting. Surprised? Nope.

I want to see the SEC find that Frist violated the rules against insider trading.

Actually, Frist is still under investigation for that one.
 
Earlier today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) received notice from the Federal Election Commission (FEC) indicating that in response to a complaint filed by CREW, the FEC found that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's 2000 Senate campaign committee, Frist 2000, Inc. violated federal campaign finance laws...

It does make a difference that it was Frist's campaign committee that has been charged with the violation and not Frist himself. The article doesn't say enough concerning the implications of Frist's actions.
 
Pen said:
It does make a difference that it was Frist's campaign committee that has been charged with the violation and not Frist himself. The article doesn't say enough concerning the implications of Frist's actions.

So maybe the Enron executives shouldn't be held accountable.
 
Pen said:
It does make a difference that it was Frist's campaign committee that has been charged with the violation and not Frist himself. The article doesn't say enough concerning the implications of Frist's actions.

Not Frist himself? That is not true.

In June 2000, Senator Frist took $1 million of the money that had been contributed to his 2000 Senate campaign and invested it in the stock market, where it promptly began losing money. In November 2000, Senator Frist sought to collect $1.2 million he had lent his 1994 Senate campaign committee. As a result of the stock market losses, however, Frist 2000, Inc. did not have enough money to repay the loan. Senator Frist solved this problem by having the 1994 and the 2000 campaign committees jointly take out a $1.44 million bank loan at a cost of $10,000 a month interest. Frist 2000, Inc. did not report this debt on its FEC disclosure forms.

As you can see, Frist himself was intimately involved in Frist 2000, Inc.
 
I'm sure your facts are right, Danar, but my confusion is that he lent his own money in one campaign and tried to get it back in another? Obviously, I have little knowledge of campaign finance law.

Frankly, I lost respect for the man with his Sciavo stunt.
 
Pen said:
I'm sure your facts are right, Danar, but my confusion is that he lent his own money in one campaign and tried to get it back in another? Obviously, I have little knowledge of campaign finance law.

Frankly, I lost respect for the man with his Sciavo stunt.
Don't forget about Frist caving on Stem Cell research too.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom