• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI Taps Hacker Tactics to Spy on Suspects

Jango

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 16, 2012
Messages
5,587
Reaction score
2,291
Location
Michigan
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
Law-enforcement officials in the U.S. are expanding the use of tools routinely used by computer hackers to gather information on suspects, bringing the criminal wiretap into the cyber age.

Federal agencies have largely kept quiet about these capabilities, but court documents and interviews with people involved in the programs provide new details about the hacking tools, including spyware delivered to computers and phones through email or Web links—techniques more commonly associated with attacks by criminals.

People familiar with the Federal Bureau of Investigation's programs say that the use of hacking tools under court orders has grown as agents seek to keep up with suspects who use new communications technology, including some types of online chat and encryption tools. The use of such communications, which can't be wiretapped like a phone, is called "going dark" among law enforcement.

A spokeswoman for the FBI declined to comment.

The FBI develops some hacking tools internally and purchases others from the private sector. With such technology, the bureau can remotely activate the microphones in phones running Google Inc.'s Android software to record conversations, one former U.S. official said. It can do the same to microphones in laptops without the user knowing, the person said. Google declined to comment.

The bureau typically uses hacking in cases involving organized crime, child pornography or counterterrorism, a former U.S. official said. It is loath to use these tools when investigating hackers, out of fear the suspect will discover and publicize the technique, the person said.

The FBI has been developing hacking tools for more than a decade, but rarely discloses its techniques publicly in legal cases.

Earlier this year, a federal warrant application in a Texas identity-theft case sought to use software to extract files and covertly take photos using a computer's camera, according to court documents. The judge denied the application, saying, among other things, that he wanted more information on how data collected from the computer would be minimized to remove information on innocent people.

FBI Taps Hacker Tactics to Spy on Suspects - WSJ.com

Governmental agencies are going to ape **** crazy lengths on this whole cyberspying and cyberespionage thing. Whatever happened to good ole fashioned police/intelligence work? I mean, I'm sure, as this article highlights, that the F.B.I. has nabbed some low-lifes because of their cyberspying, which is a good thing because those low-lifes aren't harming innocent individuals anymore, but, we as a people have to TRUST the F.B.I. with these hacking and cyberspying capabilities and that they won't abuse their power. And that, nowadays, after everything that has been previously revealed in the press or in a Congressional hearing... is hard to do.
 
FBI Taps Hacker Tactics to Spy on Suspects - WSJ.com

Governmental agencies are going to ape **** crazy lengths on this whole cyberspying and cyberespionage thing. Whatever happened to good ole fashioned police/intelligence work? I mean, I'm sure, as this article highlights, that the F.B.I. has nabbed some low-lifes because of their cyberspying, which is a good thing because those low-lifes aren't harming innocent individuals anymore, but, we as a people have to TRUST the F.B.I. with these hacking and cyberspying capabilities and that they won't abuse their power. And that, nowadays, after everything that has been previously revealed in the press or in a Congressional hearing... is hard to do.

This is pretty much what police work is. Yes, it should be involved in a specific investigation and it should be limited by a warrant, but gathering evidence is pretty much normal. They would have tried to do this in the old days, but this was not around. Oh, I remember the good ole days when cops rode around on horses instead of in cars. They should get back to good old original riding around on horses because that is real police work.
 
I have zero issue with the Fed's doing this as long as they follow all the previously standard protocols for obtaining warrants for other types of wire taps.

We've moved into a digital age. Having 40 to 50 year old wire tapping laws and techniques to deal with things such as burner cell phones, email, sms, message boards, video chats, VOIP calls, and other such methods and means of communicating is idiotic. I don't have a problem with out governments technological capabilities keeping pace with the what's available in the world; I just have an issue when the new capacities aren't treated with the same scrutiny as the old ones.
 
Back
Top Bottom