- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 12,196
- Reaction score
- 8,124
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.
He said the FBI’s probe was limited to only a few years around the turn of the century, based on a deal led by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, who oversaw the case that led to Epstein pleading guilty to a sex trafficking and sex solicitation charge in state court in exchange for a deal that he not face federal prosecution.
The evidence the FBI developed during that probe didn’t show Epstein procured women for others.
FBI has no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to others
The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.www.washingtontimes.com
Paywall bypass: https://archive.ph/C25sj
Blatant, stone cold bullshit.
The best case scenario is Kash is being overtly particular about the wording in asserting it means that Epstein did not procure minors to put into the ongoing possession of other people... which is of course saying much of nothing and needs not be explicated unless the idea was to suspiciously *imply* that Epstein did not provide or otherwise make available underage girls to others for sexual exploitation without actually saying so; something that is obviously and completely ludicrous.
The girls themselves have said they were.
That strikes me as "evidence".
Far right, no credibility propaganda mill, The Washington Times, is dutifully presenting MAGAt lies, as usual.FBI has no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to others
The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.www.washingtontimes.com
Paywall bypass: https://archive.ph/C25sj
Blatant, stone cold bullshit.
The best case scenario is Kash is being overtly particular about the wording in asserting it means that Epstein did not procure minors to put into the ongoing possession of other people... which is of course saying much of nothing and needs not be explicated unless the idea was to *imply* that Epstein did not provide or otherwise make available underage girls to others for sexual exploitation without actually saying so; something that is obviously and completely ludicrous. Even this is obviously very suspicious and guilty behaviour on Kash's part and screams govt coverup.
No better source than one among those that should be friendliest to Kash et al to quote his obvious bullshit; gets ahead of the off-hand dismissals over 'bias'.Far right, no credibility propaganda mill, The Washington Times, is dutifully presenting MAGAt lies, as usual.
I don’t think Kash cares.The girls themselves have said they were.
That strikes me as "evidence".
According to Charlie Kirk, they need to submit to their husbands.Pure hearsay.
If people believed women, the whole world would come to a standstill, so please don't interfere with the march of time.
MAGA.
According to Charlie Kirk, they need to submit to their husbands.
Here's your context.So Epstein forced them into marriages? Taken out of context.
Here's your context.
That's why we're here.Arguable
Don't care.and off topic.
>99.9% of all so-called "sex crimes" are either totally fake bullshit or stuff that shouldn't be criminalized(too high ages of consent, stuff unrelated to actual sex acts but stupidly categorized as such and so on)Blatant, stone cold bullshit.
Unproven allegations are "evidence" to you? Too bad, I hope someone will find some girls to make some allegations about you raping them.The girls themselves have said they were.
That strikes me as "evidence".
They need no credibility. The burden of proof is not on them. Those that make the allegations have to come with the verifiable evidence to be examined rigorously. MAGA are evil for many other things but here it's not the case.Far right, no credibility propaganda mill, The Washington Times, is dutifully presenting MAGAt lies, as usual.
>99.9% of all so-called "sex crimes" are either totally fake bullshit or stuff that shouldn't be criminalized(too high ages of consent, stuff unrelated to actual sex acts but stupidly categorized as such and so on)
Propaganda and manipulation are super huge in this area, the savage zealots(often feminists, but also conservatives and other idiots) have been inventing all sorts terms and concepts with the sole purpose of manipulating, brainwashing and deceiving people - all this happens at different levels from very strong ideological indoctrination targeting individual to numerous deceptions targeting the general public, often in the press/media. Same zealots are also very opposed to punishing unproven allegations or even clear false allegations. It would ruin their world.
In the Epstein case it's not even clear what the allegations are. Illiterate evil morons with often through around the term "pedophile" which means sexual acts with PRE-pubescents. Others will say that some teenage girls joined so parties or events, with no mention of sexual acts. Others say it's some prostitution ring.
Zero evidence in all cases. Time has come for humanity to severely punish unproven allegations of so called "sex crimes" (an perhaps any crime)
Unproven allegations are "evidence" to you? Too bad, I hope someone will find some girls to make some allegations about you raping them.
They need no credibility. The burden of proof is not on them. Those that make the allegations have to come with the verifiable evidence to be examined rigorously. MAGA are evil for many other things but here it's not the case.
Making allegations of crime without evidence should be punished severely. So should be attempts to present allegations as evidence or to shift the burden of proof.
testified = made unproven allegationsGirls who testified that he did
Kash Patel had a 4-hour temper tantrum in the senate yesterday. He looked like a petulant little child who just lost their toys. It was a disgusting representation of the world's premier LE agency.FBI has no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to others
The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.www.washingtontimes.com
Paywall bypass: https://archive.ph/C25sj
Blatant, stone cold bullshit.
The best case scenario is Kash is being overtly particular about the wording in asserting it means that Epstein did not procure minors to put into the ongoing possession of other people... which is of course saying much of nothing and needs not be explicated unless the idea was to *imply* that Epstein did not provide or otherwise make available underage girls to others for sexual exploitation without actually saying so; something that is obviously and completely ludicrous. Even this is blatantly very suspicious and guilty behaviour on Kash's part and screams govt coverup.
He's not allowed to care. His bosses name is TACO.I don’t think Kash cares.
Can you blame him? Patel got the job because of unflinching loyalty to Trump. If he wavers, he's fired. Same with Hegseth, Bondi, Gabbard, and the rest of the Keystone Kabinet. Except maybe for RFKrazy. I don't know WTF that's about.Kash Patel had a 4-hour temper tantrum in the senate yesterday. He looked like a petulant little child who just lost their toys. It was a disgusting representation of the world's premier LE agency.
When republican senators are complaining about unsatisfactory answers, you know the agency is in trouble. Patel is not interested in protecting and promoting the FBI, he's only interested in pleasing and protecting Trump, his Jesus.
He is a disgrace.
Trump's personal FBI. I wouldn't expect anything less, frankly.FBI has no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to others
The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.www.washingtontimes.com
Paywall bypass: https://archive.ph/C25sj
Blatant, stone cold bullshit.
The best case scenario is Kash is being overtly particular about the wording in asserting it means that Epstein did not procure minors to put into the ongoing possession of other people... which is of course saying much of nothing and needs not be explicated unless the idea was to *imply* that Epstein did not provide or otherwise make available underage girls to others for sexual exploitation without actually saying so; something that is obviously and completely ludicrous. Even this is blatantly very suspicious and guilty behaviour on Kash's part and screams govt coverup.
I'm not sure how long the decent Americans can continue to put up with this third world authoritarian bullshit. Something has to give.Trump's personal FBI. I wouldn't expect anything less, frankly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?