• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fannie, Freddie Overhaul Could Cost $685 Billion

First off, the President does not control monetary policy. Secondly, on a fundamental level, China's RYB is completely undervalued given their $2 trillion of reserves sitting in the Bank of China.

Nations in which we have a large current account deficit should, on the basis of balance of payment fundamentals, expect the dollar to continue to devalue.

We buy more from our trading partners than we sell, leaving them to hold $485,000,000,000 in dollars at the end of the day. What do they do with these dollars? Purchase dollar denominated assets such as US Treasury securities (virtually risk free), oil, AAA rated private debt, etc....

A devaluing currency is response to a continued negative current account balance. Of course there will be short term fluctuations due to the speculative nature of forex traders. But in the long run, a stronger US economy will push the dollar forward.

So the question is: Do we allow our currency to appreciate by purchasing less foreign goods? Something tells me they wouldn't be happy about that either. This is not a partisan issue; you should be happy we are finally standing up to the world (who depends on us to purchase their goods).

This president had a filibuster proof congress so much of what has happened is on him and his party.

The deficit has increased under him at record rates so yes he signs bills causing this.

World To Fed: Stop Printing All That Money - Investors.com
 
This president had a filibuster proof congress so much of what has happened is on him and his party.

The deficit has increased under him at record rates so yes he signs bills causing this.

World To Fed: Stop Printing All That Money - Investors.com

Wake up and smell reality; we would have had a massive deficit regardless of whether the president bailed out Wall Street and Detroit. Recessions cause people to become unemployed, and therefore tax revenue to fall. This is really a simple concept, i am amazed by the level of partisan republicans who cannot comprehend it. It shows you have no business discussing such matters.
 
Wake up and smell reality; we would have had a massive deficit regardless of whether the president bailed out Wall Street and Detroit. Recessions cause people to become unemployed, and therefore tax revenue to fall. This is really a simple concept, i am amazed by the level of partisan republicans who cannot comprehend it. It shows you have no business discussing such matters.

Correct and what Obama did was grow government and increase the deficit it did little for the economy or unemployment.
 
Correct and what Obama did was grow government and increase the deficit it did little for the economy or unemployment.


Now if AIG had gone under what do you think would have happened to all those pensions?
 
today: NYT: Fannie, Freddie executives earned millions - Business - U.S. business - The New York Times - msnbc.com

Regulators have approved generous executive compensation at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the taxpayer-backed mortgage finance giants, with little scrutiny or analysis, according to a report published Thursday by the inspector general of the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

The companies, whose fates are to be decided by Congress this year, paid a combined $17 million to their chief executives in 2009 and 2010, the two full years when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were wards of the state, the report found.

The top six executives at the companies received $35.4 million over the two years. Since Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken over in September 2008, the companies’ mounting mortgage losses have required a $153 billion infusion from taxpayers. Total losses may reach $363 billion through 2013, according to government estimates.

Charles E. Haldeman Jr., a former head of Putnam Investments, the giant fund management concern, joined Freddie Mac as its chief executive in 2009. He made $7.8 million for 2009 and 2010. Fannie Mae’s chief is Michael J. Williams, who has worked at the company since 1991. He received $9.3 million for the two years. Company officials declined to comment.

The inspector general’s report noted that the executives at Fannie and Freddie received far more than their counterparts at other federal housing agencies. The top executive at Ginnie Mae, for example, received an annual salary of less than $200,000. The inspector general suggested that the agency review the discrepancy and account for it to taxpayers.

fannie and fred, by the way, are EXEMPT (like so many of obama's pets) from the president's reg reform, his #2 domestic accomplishment which (like his #1) he no longer seems able to talk about in public

house republicans, by the way, are working to KILL the unfortunate f's

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Death by 8 bills - Meredith Shiner - POLITICO.com
 
Back
Top Bottom