• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

False flag?

Wehrwolfen

Banned
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
402
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
By: DrJohn


image.jpg



False Flag:


False flag (or black flag) describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them. Operations carried during peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organization behind an operation.​

Out of nowhere the Obama regime issues a worldwide terror alert including the closure of many embassies. US Senator Saxby Chambliss gave an excited asssessment of the threat:


“Chatter means conversation among terrorists about the planning that’s going on — very reminiscent of what we saw pre-9/11,” Chambliss, R-Ga., told NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“This is the most serious threat that I’ve seen in the last several years,” he said.​

Now contrast that with Obama’s May 23 speech:


So that’s the current threat. Lethal, yet less capable, al-Qaida affiliates, threats to diplomatic facilities and businesses abroad, homegrown extremists. This is the future of terrorism. We have to take these threats seriously and do all that we can to confront them. But as we shape our response, we have to recognize that the scale of this threat closely resembles the types of attacks we faced before 9/11.

In the 1980s, we lost Americans to terrorism at our embassy in Beirut, at our Marine barracks in Lebanon, on a cruise ship at sea, at a disco in Berlin, and on a Pan Am flight, Flight 103, over Lockerbie. In the 1990s, we lost Americans to terrorism at the World Trade Center, at our military facilities in Saudi Arabia, and at our embassy in Kenya.

These attacks were all brutal. They were all deadly. And we learned that, left unchecked, these threats can grow. But if dealt with smartly and proportionally, these threats need not rise to the level that we saw on the eve of 9/11.​

Then things start to get strange. An alleged “evacuation” of the Yemen Embassy is described by the Obama regime as a “staff reduction.”

In a press conference today, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki insisted it was inaccurate to call the departure of nearly 100 U.S. government personnel from their posts at the U.S. embassy in Yemen today an evacuation. Instead, she characterized the airlift as a “reduction in staff” and an “ordered departure.”

Earlier Tuesday, the United States flew all non-emergency U.S. government personnel from Sanaa, Yemen, to Germany in U.S. Air Force aircraft, and urged ”those U.S. citizens currently living in Yemen to depart immediately.” The British government has also evacuated its embassy staff.​

Then everything gets beyond weird. So concerned with the terror threat is Obama that he goes on the Tonight Show to brief Jay Leno about terrorism and his policy towards Putin and Russia. The White House press corps is relegated to watching the taping from another room. The pool report:


[Excerpt]

Read more:
False flag? | Flopping Aces

Must be a habit of this administration
 
By: DrJohn

False Flag:

False flag (or black flag) describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them. Operations carried during peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organization behind an operation.​

Out of nowhere the Obama regime issues a worldwide terror alert including the closure of many embassies. US Senator Saxby Chambliss gave an excited asssessment of the threat:

False flag? | Flopping Aces

Must be a habit of this administration

The temperature in Hell just dropped 500 degrees. I actually agree with you!

You know, if you'd quit posting bigotry, we might take you more seriously. Try it for a couple of weeks just to see how it works out. I mean this kindly, not sarcastically.
 
Well, somethings going on, thats for sure.
 
And I thought this was going to be an expose on BushII and his run-up to Iraq. Where a whole bunch of fake intel was used to trump up a false threat to US Interests in the Middle East, a strong attack dog GOP Congress who called anyone who balked a surrender monkey, coward, or a member of the 'Hate America First Club'.

Now we have one crowd convinced we are getting run out of the Middle East with widespread evacuations, wide spread jail breaks, a deadly Consulate attack, and US Weapons used by Jihadists... They use this flawed information to try and claim Obama is losing the War on Terror, so much for his al-Queera is decimated claims...

Next onto the stage is a group hinting it is a false flag for political reasons? Hard to believe because some of his biggest critics are 125% behind the assessment these threats are real.

Not sure why the raised eyebrow over calling a staff reduction that and not mass evacuation... thought 'we' didn't like looking scared? Course if the embassy had not closed, put a bunch more barricades up and evaced...if they had stayed open and done business as usual and the terrorists could seize an opportunity to strike with massive deaths...

Oh Wehrwolfen would be beside himself in unholy outrage. :roll:

I'd say the earlier Yemen strikes look a little clearer now, an attempt to disrupt a terrorist attack being planned on a large scale. I'd also say just because we the people were not kept up to date on the minute by minute change in the terror assessments doesn't mean things were not changing- just means tipping your hand to let al-Queera what you do and don't know in a timely fashion doesn't make sense.
 
Back
Top Bottom