• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

False Flag Chemical Weapons Attack on Syria. Pretext for All Out War?

Wehrwolfen

Banned
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
402
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
By Stephen Lendman
August 24, 2013

False flags are an integral part of covert US military-intelligence ops: ” a deliberate gross distortion(s) of the truth used especially as a propaganda tactic.”

Official stories are false. They’re contrary to reality. They turn truth on its head. They point fingers the wrong way. They’re pretexts for militarism, wars, mass killing and destruction, occupations, domestic repression, and other extremist national security state measures.

Wednesday’s Ghouta incident raises disturbing questions. It was a clear anti-Syrian provocation. No evidence suggests Assad’s involvement. Clear analysis shows he’d have everything to lose and nothing to gain.

Syrian insurgents used chemical weapons numerous times before. Clear evidence proves it. Media scoundrels suppressed it. They substituted lies for truth. They do it every time. It’s standard practice.

On August 23, Russia Today headlined “Materials implicating Syrian govt in chemical attack prepared before incident – Russia.”

According to Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Aleksandr Lukashevich:

We’re getting more new evidence that this criminal act was of a provocative nature.”

“In particular, there are reports circulating on the Internet, in particular that the materials of the incident and accusations against government troops had been posted for several hours before the so-called attack. Thus, it was a pre-planned action.”​

[Excerpt]

Read more:
False Flag Chemical Weapons Attack on Syria. Pretext for All Out War? | Global Research

Were the pre-planned attacks ordered by Barack Hussein Obama?
 

shrubnose

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
19,463
Reaction score
8,732
Location
Europe
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
By Stephen Lendman
August 24, 2013

False flags are an integral part of covert US military-intelligence ops: ” a deliberate gross distortion(s) of the truth used especially as a propaganda tactic.”

Official stories are false. They’re contrary to reality. They turn truth on its head. They point fingers the wrong way. They’re pretexts for militarism, wars, mass killing and destruction, occupations, domestic repression, and other extremist national security state measures.

Wednesday’s Ghouta incident raises disturbing questions. It was a clear anti-Syrian provocation. No evidence suggests Assad’s involvement. Clear analysis shows he’d have everything to lose and nothing to gain.

Syrian insurgents used chemical weapons numerous times before. Clear evidence proves it. Media scoundrels suppressed it. They substituted lies for truth. They do it every time. It’s standard practice.

On August 23, Russia Today headlined “Materials implicating Syrian govt in chemical attack prepared before incident – Russia.”

According to Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Aleksandr Lukashevich:

We’re getting more new evidence that this criminal act was of a provocative nature.”

“In particular, there are reports circulating on the Internet, in particular that the materials of the incident and accusations against government troops had been posted for several hours before the so-called attack. Thus, it was a pre-planned action.”​

[Excerpt]

Read more:
False Flag Chemical Weapons Attack on Syria. Pretext for All Out War? | Global Research

[B]Were the pre-planned attacks ordered by Barack Hussein Obama?[/B]




Wehrwolfen,

This is a ridiculous idea.

If you have any credible evidence (Not from outfits like Global research.org which has zero credibility.) to support this malarkey, let's see it. Otherwise, you should delete the OP.

It really makes you look even more foolish than you are.

Was that what you wanted the post to do?

I find that kind of hard to believe.




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
 
Last edited:

Wehrwolfen

Banned
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
402
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Will Obama Force America To “Absorb A Terror Attack” To Save His Presidency?




Ominous words suggest desperate administration could turn to false flag in bid to crush resistance against big government

Will Obama Force America To Absorb A Terror Attack To Save His Presidency?


By Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
September 22, 2010

President Obama’s ominous claim that America can “absorb” a terror attack will have many fearing that staging some kind of false flag event will be the only way the government can overturn the massive resistance to big government that has grown exponentially since Obama took office.

During an interview with journalist Bob Woodward, the president said, “We can absorb a terrorist attack. We’ll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever . . . we absorbed it and we are stronger.”

However, the only thing that was made stronger by 9/11 was the federal government’s power to harass, shake down and spy on the American people, as was exemplified yet again recently when Pennsylvania’s Office of Homeland Security was caught conducting surveillance on peaceful protest groups with the aid of an Israeli security company who listed Second Amendment groups amongst others as terrorists.

Given how both Bush and Clinton before him exploited terror attacks on U.S. soil to boost their flagging political agendas, we should be wary of Obama and his masters making good use of their own “October surprise” to counter record low approval figures for Congress on the eve of the midterm elections.

Talk show hosts such as Michael Savage have long been warning of a “Reichstag fire-like event” would be concocted to reinvigorate support behind Obama and given that his advisors include such ruthless individuals as Rahm Emanuel, the knife wielding son of a former Israeli terrorist who was involved in bombing hotels, marketplaces as well as massacres, we would be naive to put anything past these people.

[Excerpt]

Read more:
Prison Planet.com » Will Obama Force America To “Absorb A Terror Attack” To Save His Presidency?

Three years later we have a variation on the theme. Obama bringing America on the verge of a possible WWIII.
 

Utility Man

Sidewalk Inspector
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 16, 2011
Messages
8,198
Reaction score
10,172
Location
US
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Conservatives will side with the Russians instead of going along with the president ?

Have to wonder if the original poster speaks Russian.
 
Last edited:

Wraith8

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
104
Reaction score
36
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Global research.org also posts 9/11 truther nonsense so that gives you an idea of how credible they are.
 

Respecthelect

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Messages
2,470
Reaction score
969
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Attack the chemical weapons and stores, regardless who possesses them. Don't take sides, destroy the chemicals themselves. That way, false flag or not, the problem gets solved.

Not one congressman, senator or president intends to destroy a single chemical weapon, though. The hawks plan to carefully target around chemicals. Anti-war nuts intend to pretend that it's not our problem. Out of 536 leaders, not a single one advocates solving the Syrian chemical weapons problem. Use chemicals to justify war - yes. Eliminate chemicals - no.
 

Wehrwolfen

Banned
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
402
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Pat Buchanan: Syria Chemical Weapons Attack ‘Reeks of False Flag Operation’

by Evan McMurry
August 31st, 2013


Former Richard Nixon speechwriter Pat Buchanan floated the notion that the reported use of chemical weapons by the Syrian army in their civil war against rebel fighters was a false flag operation designed to give western powers an excuse to intervene.

“This thing reeks of a false flag operation,” Buchanan told Newsmax. “I would not understand or comprehend that Bashar al-Assad—no matter how bad a man he may be—would be so stupid as to order a chemical weapons attack on civilians in his own country, when the immediate consequences of which might be that he would be at war with the United States.”

Buchanan added that he “didn’t know for sure” if the chemical weapons attack was a false flag or not.

Putin: U.S. Charge of Syria Chemical Weapons Use ‘Utter Rubbish’

Secretary of State John Kerry said earlier this week that the United States was convinced al-Assad had used chemical weapons in an attack that killed almost 1,500 Syrian citizens, one-third of them children.

Buchanan is not the only American politician to doubt the veracity of this claim. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul wondered if the chemical weapons had in fact been used by rebel fighters.


[Excerpt]

Read more:
Pat Buchanan: Syria Chemical Weapons 'Reeks' Of False Falg | Mediaite

Of course the pure at heart Progressives would never consider Obama could do a thing like running a False Flag Operations.
 

Respecthelect

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Messages
2,470
Reaction score
969
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
False flag or not, chemical weapons should be attacked.

.
 

poweRob

USMC 1988-1996
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
74,476
Reaction score
43,751
Location
New Mexico
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
This thread delivers.
 

DiAnna

Hooter Babe
Moderator
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
52,644
Reaction score
29,834
Location
Northern California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Independent
Some of the most imbecilic notions expressed since the "birther" chronicles. Utter rubbish, to the point of laughability! :lol:
 
Top Bottom