His BBB will not add to the Debt!
checkyourfact.com
His BBB will not add to the Debt!
Sorry you loose!
Thanks for playing, that was fun
FACT CHECK: Would Joe Biden’s Build Back Better Agenda ‘Cost Zero Dollars’?
The majority of experts CYF talked to were skeptical the bill would be cost neutral
www.betteramericanmedia.org
Epic Fail!!!!!.........nope-----
The Majority of Americans Support America’s New Economic Agenda
What is it about the Build Back Better Infrastructure Bill that has Americans from Main st America to big cities coming together to support America’s Economic Growth? Most Americans, from big cities to small towns, support a new economic plan that will “establish a universal pre-K program...
it is a valid proposal, as opposed to blatant liesEpic Fail!!!!!.........
So you are REALLY trying to say Biden's not lying by restating Biden's lie ????...... LMAO !!!
Please try harder to follow your own questions!
the proposal outlines, economically., how it will not add to the debt. Quite valid
Like I said you are sighting "the lie" as justification that "the lie" is not "a lie"..... Do you not see how insane that is?
Through economic growth, etc, etc and revenues gained, as well as other items outlined, yes--------not magical, just good econ. planning................it's all explained.....
His BBB will not add to the Debt!
Sorry you loose!
Thanks for playing, that was fun
FACT CHECK: Would Joe Biden’s Build Back Better Agenda ‘Cost Zero Dollars’?
The majority of experts CYF talked to were skeptical the bill would be cost neutral
Big Tech are private companies. They have a right to get on whoever's side they want. It just so happens the Big Tech owners don't see things the way you do. That's life.
Doesn't matter what you argue. If the democrats are proposing it, per republicans, it's bad.
Obama tried that LIE with ObamaCare! Only a feeble mined person would buy that Lie after history has proven it a Lie !
First place, it was $3.5T over 10 years, so that is a $350B outlay per year. This would add about 8% to the budget (compared to the $1.5T, which would be $150B per year, on a $4.5T budget, would be a rounding error of government expenditure). That all said, when the federal government spends money, a large portion (don't know here exactly) is returned to the federal government in the form of taxes. There is also a stimulus effect, so you often get back more than the direct tax benefit, you get the tax benefit on the economic growth. It is an investment. With certain expenditures, the federal government actually gets back more than it lays out; other expenditures it gets back a large portion of what it lays out; and some expenditures produce no benefit. That is why the CBO scores a bill. While $3.5T (and its now more like $1.5T) would rarely equate to zero (but it could), it also does not equate to $3.5T (or $1.5T with the lesser bill). There is an economic impact to any government expenditure that must be understood.Like I said you are sighting "the lie" as justification that "the lie" is not "a lie"..... Do you not see how insane that is?
Let me try this technique!
I am the Greatest Person in the world ! Just ask me, and I'll tell you it's True ! ... LOL !
So you believe that we can some how come up with $3.5 Trillion magically and it cost nothing ? .....
Captain Obvious says:
“Simple math for President Biden: $3.5 trillion does NOT equal zero,”....
I think you are just trying to convince yourself that the Truth is not as bad as it REAL is!
You might want to wander down to your local community college and see if they have a course in Macro-Economics or Public Finance. You would have a better understanding of what I am saying to you.
The 'big tech are private companies' line about 'their rights' is more complicated. It's true to a point; but ultimately society and government have the right to protect bigger freedoms, if too much power over our information becomes corruptly held by any interest. Imagine China-level control by having it in the hands of 'private companies' who serve the government or another interest for corrupt reasons. That's still tyranny.
