Not really I already showed that he did not claim he gave them a 10% raise. I rather not sell my cabbages twice.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
And here is the answer to that nonsense from my post #69 in this very same thread:
I decided to just take this issue on directly because this is another case of Trumpets simply holding the most ignorant, absurdly juvenile understanding of the responsibilities of the Chief Executive or are simply too unscrupulous to care, hence trolling the entire country. Good luck with either Trumpets.
Here is the actual Trump quote before the Troops:
"You know, plenty of people said we could make your raise smaller. They said we could make it 3%, we could make it 4%. I said no. Make it 10%!"
Did Donald holiday visit the troops as candidate Donald, as private citizen Donald or as congressman Donald? NO....he visited the troops in the field as the Chief Executive of the United States, their Commander in Chief. I have argued in this thread that discussing politics under those circumstances treats those troops as pawns and further argued that breeching the topic of Military Pay was absurd. Addressing the issue of Military pay the way he addressed it was a LIE.
When the Chief Executive speaks he can only "honestly" discuss what he has accomplished as Chief Executive. Talking about what he tried to do but what he could not accomplish is patently absurd on its face and is in fact a left handed lie at best.
"I said no, make it 10%" from the lips of the Chief Executive can only be taken one way, and that is to tell the audience "that is what we did" PERIOD. There is no wiggle room on this point precisely because he is the Chief Executive of his Administration and therefore is speaking for the accomplishments, not the efforts of but the accomplishments of his Executive Office.
As STUPID as it would have been for the Chief Executive to try to imply an effort that failed, had Trump wanted to do that, there was a simple remedy. He could have easily said "that he actually had a desire to make their pay raise higher but failed to be convincing in that effort". Again makes little to no sense for the Chief Executive to make any statement regarding an Executive effort regarding military pay in that setting. However had he framed it that way, at least he would not have been LYING assuming that internal government discussions regarding Military pay played out that way.
I don't care if Trump was reading off prepared text before the troops or not. If it was prepared text it is too Trumpian to have come from anybody but Donald and it was an effort to burn the candle from both ends...to avoid the truth while saying something and if you are going to skirt the truth and can't resist the temptation to flap your gums you inevitability end up LYING!
There is so much STUPID in either meaning to say "we increased your pay by 10%" or "that we tried and failed". There is so much dishonesty in either option, so much unscrupulousness in either option that we could discuss in this ridiculous thread that it simply does not matter! You are left with only two options Trumpets. Your champion is either a Stupid, unscrupulous, lying SOB unable to communicate or a Stupid, unscrupulous, lying SOB? Take your pick!