• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton Scheduled To Meet With FBI on Saturday

imyoda said:
WRONG...........

Read the news report before posting...........
Click to expand...

I did. But since it was the Daily Caller I thought I better google to see if it was legit. The only other credible source about it was CNN story from a month ago.

So until a more credible source verifies the story I'm putting your thread in the round file.
 
Last edited:
Moot said:
So what? At the time, that was what the CIA intelligence said it was. And now they have a person in custody who was directly involved in the attack saying he was motivated by an anti-Islam video. Read the link in my post.
Click to expand...

What difference does it make what the CIA said when Hillary knew it was a terrorist attack, told that to her close circle, and then said something completely different to everyone else?
 
Moderate Right said:
What difference does it make what the CIA said when Hillary knew it was a terrorist attack, told that to her close circle, and then said something completely different to everyone else?
Click to expand...

Why would Hillary think it was a terrorist attack unless that is what the CIA first told her the night of the attacks?


Do you know what "raw data" is?

CIA raw data
 
Moot said:
Why would Hillary think it was a terrorist attack unless that is what the CIA first told her the night of the attacks?


Do you know what "raw data" is?

CIA raw data
Click to expand...

I don't know how she knew but why did she tell her inner circle that it WAS a terrorist attack while playing stupid with everyone else? Why didn't she tell her inner circle the same official CIA line that she told everyone else?
 
Moot said:
I did. But since it was the Daily Caller I thought I better google to see if it was legit. The only other credible source about it was CNN story from a month ago.

So until a more credible source verifies the story I'm putting your thread in the round file.
Click to expand...

How silly of you........... The reports of the Saturday meeting are being reported all over the web........

FBI to quiz Hillary Clinton about her use of a private email server in her home: report
Hillary Clinton to be interviewed by FBI on email server - NY Daily News

Hillary Clinton Reportedly Meeting with FBI on Saturday
Hillary Clinton Reportedly Meeting With FBI on Saturday | We Are Change

Hillary's holiday plans: FBI will reportedly interrogate Clinton over long weekend
Hillary?s holiday plans: FBI will reportedly interrogate Clinton over long weekend - Salon.com

yoda does not lie
 
Moderate Right said:
I don't know how she knew but why did she tell her inner circle that it WAS a terrorist attack while playing stupid with everyone else? Why didn't she tell her inner circle the same official CIA line that she told everyone else?
Click to expand...

It is a big SO WHAT........did she break any law?............Mountain out of a mole hill
 
imyoda said:
How silly of you........... The reports of the Saturday meeting are being reported all over the web........

FBI to quiz Hillary Clinton about her use of a private email server in her home: report
Hillary Clinton to be interviewed by FBI on email server - NY Daily News

Hillary Clinton Reportedly Meeting with FBI on Saturday
Hillary Clinton Reportedly Meeting With FBI on Saturday | We Are Change

Hillary's holiday plans: FBI will reportedly interrogate Clinton over long weekend
Hillary?s holiday plans: FBI will reportedly interrogate Clinton over long weekend - Salon.com

yoda does not lie
Click to expand...

They're all repeating the same Daily Caller story...and not one verified the Daily Caller's source or claim. They are all just echoing the same story from one far right biased source. So when a more credible news agency like Reuters, AP, WaPo, CNN, NYT, etc. reports it then I'll believe it....and yoda would be wise to do the same.
 
Moot said:
They're all repeating the same Daily Caller story...and not one verified the Daily Caller's source or claim. They are all just echoing the same story from one far right biased source. So when a more credible news agency like Reuters, AP, WaPo, CNN, NYT, etc. reports it then I'll believe it....and yoda would be wise to do the same.
Click to expand...

Please tell me how reporting a possible meeting of HRC with the FBI is biased.........And really you ain't my momma........so I need no directions from you
 
Moderate Right said:
I don't know how she knew but why did she tell her inner circle that it WAS a terrorist attack while playing stupid with everyone else? Why didn't she tell her inner circle the same official CIA line that she told everyone else?
Click to expand...

She told her daughter in private. She did not tell the public what she told her daughter...so if she lied...then it was to her daughter and not the public. But what she told her daughter was not a lie...it was raw information that was coming in from the CIA as the attacks were occurring.

It would be like you arriving on the scene of accident and smelling booze and then telling your closet friend the accident was caused by a drunk driver....when in fact, it was later determined that the accident was caused by a person who was texting while driving and the smell of booze was coming from a broken bottle of wine in the back seat. The point is...the facts at the beginning of an attack...any attack or disaster...are not always known at the beginning...and often change as more information is discovered. So you are blaming Clinton for not telling the public the information that had not been vetted by the CIA. And if she had then she would've been accused of revealing classified information. So it wouldn't matter what she did....she's never going to win with the right wing hate machine.
 
Moot said:
She told her daughter in private. She did not tell the public what she told her daughter...so if she lied...then it was to her daughter and not the public. But what she told her daughter was not a lie...it was raw information that was coming in from the CIA as the attacks were occurring.

It would be like you arriving on the scene of accident and smelling booze and then telling your closet friend the accident was caused by a drunk driver....when in fact, it was an unopened bottle of wine that busted during the accident...and it was later determined that the accident was caused by a teenager texting while driving. The point is...the facts at the beginning of an attack...any attack or disaster...are not always known at the beginning...and often change as more information is discovered. So you are blaming Clinton for not telling the public the information that had not been vetted by the CIA. And if she had then she would've been accused of revealing classified information. So it wouldn't matter what she did....she's never going to win with the right wing hate machine.
Click to expand...

That's because she is crooked, hence the name crooked Hillary.
 
imyoda said:
Please tell me how reporting a possible meeting of HRC with the FBI is biased.........And really you ain't my momma........so I need no directions from you
Click to expand...

The source is biased and it's so called source isn't verified....and no other credible sources are reporting the story. Looks like yoda could use some schooling on the difference between credible news and political news propaganda.


"...News propaganda is a type of propaganda covertly packaged as credible news, but without sufficient transparency concerning the news item's source and the motivation behind its release. Transparency of the source is one parameter critical to distinguish between news propaganda and traditional news press releases and video news releases....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_propaganda​
 
iguanaman said:
Well if he got "secret information" it certainly did not help him with the Greek fund. Bain capital also had to shutter their similar fund. There is really nothing to see here except he typical right wing demonizing of all things Hillary. It is really getting boring...
Click to expand...
I couldn't agree more!

The way the Reich Wing has treated this woman is unconscionable. All's she's ever done is serve and try to help people. And what does she get for all of her sacrifice?

This!! Hatred!!

It's sickening.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1066028582 said:
That's because she is crooked, hence the name crooked Hillary.
Click to expand...

If she's crooked she must be pretty good at it considering in all the decades that she's been under the public eye they haven't found any evidence of a crime to charge her for....but it's certainly not for lack of trying.

I think the people accusing her of being a crook are probably a lot more crooked than she is.
 
Napoleon said:
Even if she did, so what. They're not entitled to any information.
Click to expand...
Absolutely correct.

Those men were soldiers. The day they enlisted they became the property of the United States government and the United States government doesn't owe them or their families ****.

**** 'em!
 
Moot said:
The source is biased and it's so called source isn't verified....and no other credible sources are reporting the story. Looks like yoda could use some schooling on the difference between credible news and political news propaganda.


"...News propaganda is a type of propaganda covertly packaged as credible news, but without sufficient transparency concerning the news item's source and the motivation behind its release. Transparency of the source is one parameter critical to distinguish between news propaganda and traditional news press releases and video news releases....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_propaganda​
Click to expand...


OK I give up........

How you can argue over a rumor of a meeting between HRC and FBI........


Is beyond my understanding.........

I think you may have too much time on your hands
 
Jack Fabulous said:
Praise the LORD!!
Click to expand...

That works for me...................It will be the end of all the BS over/about emails........... But Faux will have to find something else to gin up to fill the time one used to tell the world about emails
 
imyoda said:
OK I give up........

How you can argue over a rumor of a meeting between HRC and FBI........


Is beyond my understanding.........

I think you may have too much time on your hands
Click to expand...

LOL

Considering how many threads you make....it's you that has too much time on their hands.

The FBI wasn't the source in your OP. It was..."a source close to the investigation into her private email server".

Gee, I wonder what right wing political operative that could be?
 
imyoda said:
It is a big SO WHAT........did she break any law?............Mountain out of a mole hill
Click to expand...

Nope. She didn't break any laws because it is not a crime to lie unless you do it under oath. We were debating whether or not she lied and she clearly did. She knew the truth right away and told her daughter and others while intentionally lying to everyone else, including the families.
 
Moot said:
She told her daughter in private. She did not tell the public what she told her daughter...so if she lied...then it was to her daughter and not the public. But what she told her daughter was not a lie...it was raw information that was coming in from the CIA as the attacks were occurring.

It would be like you arriving on the scene of accident and smelling booze and then telling your closet friend the accident was caused by a drunk driver....when in fact, it was later determined that the accident was caused by a person who was texting while driving and the smell of booze was coming from a broken bottle of wine in the back seat. The point is...the facts at the beginning of an attack...any attack or disaster...are not always known at the beginning...and often change as more information is discovered. So you are blaming Clinton for not telling the public the information that had not been vetted by the CIA. And if she had then she would've been accused of revealing classified information. So it wouldn't matter what she did....she's never going to win with the right wing hate machine.
Click to expand...

Oh boy do you buy the official party line. She told her daughter the truth and not only lied herself (as in the video) but had everyone under her spread the lies. That's the first time I ever heard anyone try claiming that she lied to her daughter. Seriously?
 
Moderate Right said:
Oh boy do you buy the official party line. She told her daughter the truth and not only lied herself (as in the video) but had everyone under her spread the lies. That's the first time I ever heard anyone try claiming that she lied to her daughter. Seriously?
Click to expand...
Except, that the attack was not by an Al Qaeda-like terrorist group. So what she told her daughter was "raw data" that had not been vetted and later proved to be wrong anyway.

So..oh boy yourself, right wing party boy.
 
Last edited:
It's all for show. If the FBI was going to truly be questioning her for a crime, it would not be in her home, and not on a Saturday. TPTB have it all set up to shut everyone up, go through the motions, talk about the grandkids, eat a little cake, maybe play a bit of poker, then the straight faces go back on the FBI guys to look all stern until they get in their cars when they all smile and high five each other.

This is a set up to shut everyone up. Period.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom