Exclusive: Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi chapter
Hillary Clinton offers a detailed account of the deadly attack on the American embassy in Benghazi — and a pointed rebuttal to Republican critics who’ve laced into her over the incident — in a much-anticipated chapter of her forthcoming book, “Hard Choices,” obtained by POLITICO.
“Those who exploit this tragedy over and over as a political tool minimize the sacrifice of those who served our country,” Clinton writes in the gripping chapter, “Benghazi: Under Attack.”
Casting doubt on the motivations of congressional Republicans who have continued to investigate the attacks, including with an upcoming House select committee, Clinton continues: “I will not be a part of a political slugfest on the backs of dead Americans. It’s just plain wrong, and it’s unworthy of our great country. Those who insist on politicizing the tragedy will have to do so without me.”
Read more: Exclusive: Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton released the Benghazi chapter from her new book to Politico. She obviously wants everything out way in advance for her run for the White House. And scolding Republicans for politicizing the attack on the backs of the four dead Americans.
Hmm...is it worse to politicize the failures and lies of the regime or is it worse to fail and lie about 4 dead Americans?
This from the people who hear about the latest mass shooting at a public school, shrug and say, "Whatevs. 2nd amendment, bitches."
I've never written what you wrote, nor ever referred to such violence as caused by a lame video that wasn't even presented in the country in question. When you want to illustrate what I say use quotes otherwise you can apologize for attributing words to me that I've never written.
Its a sad event of course, but I really wonder why the leftist village failed this loser human? I mean "it takes a village" right? Someone said that; and clearly this guy is a radical leftist who believes in that "village" people concept right? So why did the village fail him? Do we need to register the villages? License them maybe? Maybe we should charge the villages a fee, or hey maybe we need to lock up village failures like this loser human's daddy?
Its funny (well I don't mean laughing funny) but I would have thought it was due to WMDs, keeping your doctor, and even the NSA snoopage.....the government has seriously gone out of its way to discard its trust of the people. For the government (say like a diane scam artist feinstein) to say ban guns/trust us the government to protect you while turning police into a para military organization just forces common sense on people - HELL NO to GUN CONTROL.
I'm sorry, but this is a free country not one of fascist dictators that kill millions of people. We're free in part because of our right to bear arms, and you choosing to ignore the reality of 263 million dead people at the hands of government while crying about the horrible losses of a few shows a significant inadequacy on your part. For ever irrelevant. That's how you should be viewed.
Actually they are made to have big impacts by those who want control over people and a look thirst or power.
Because the media and politicians use the hysteria and pain of a mass shooting to control legal gun owners. You see gun enthusuiast, owners, and trained people with guns dont need as much of their beloved govt. the restrictions here impact legal gun owners not mentally ill people who are capable of planning and executing horrible crimes. I dare say those gang murders you noted aren't impacted either. You know who IS impacted? The honest and dedicated civilians that MIGHT have been armed and ready to defend themselves if it weren't for politicians of control.
I'm reading on the news at leaset 12 dead?
This is going to be a bad one, the anti's will come out the wood
work shortly.
Must be a terrible time for the families there, wishing them well.
So what about the 100 million plus people killed in "civilized societies" that were unable to defend themselves from tyranical governments over the past 100 years - how did that work out for those civilizations?
Governments have killed 263 million people in the last 113 years, those we lose due to criminals that ignore gun laws in the United States, while tragic, don't even begin to scratch the surface of the criminals called "GOVERNMENT" in the world in which we live - TODAY.
This is heartwarming:
More cavalierly dismissing mass shootings and making it all about gun control.
I like this next one in particular. "...while crying about the losses of a few." I guess a "few" deaths only matter if they're ambassadors killed by terrorists in a foreign land. Citizens killed in mass shootings? No sweat!
Or on the significance of reports on mass shootings. Yep, the "big impacts" of victims of mass shootings are just hyped up.
The reactions to mass shootings is "hysteria":
Yikes, in this next one Calgun really does mourn 12 dead in one shooting (albeit instantly making it about the terrible antis). Guess I'm wrong about him after all. He'll definitely call for an investigation into laws that allow for the ease of acquiring them. Looks like I have some apologizing to do.
Ha ha, just kidding. He goes on to call the victims of mass shootings statistically irrelevant compared to the deaths caused by governments. In fact, reading through Calgun's posts that was pretty much his primary theme.
and...
Yep, all that heartwarming soul searching from the side that wants an investigation into Benghazi.
And yet I still never used the words you attributed to me with quotes. Which makes you a liar and one willing to misrepresent others.
My adamant stance on our civil liberty and right to own guns has little to do with a political leader lying to us about why US citizens were killed in a full on terrorist incursion against a US facility they failed to provide adequate security for.
Okay, so you do believe then that the 2nd amendment trumps outrage over the victims of mass shootings, and therefore I was 100% correct. Combined with your belief that those victims are statistically irrelevant, it's clear that your outrage over the four deaths in Benghazi is feigned, and that people like you have less moral authority in this matter than anybody else. You faking outrage over the ambassadors' deaths is like someone at a beef ranch criticizing a poultry farm for killing animals.
the cloud that will always hang over her head is being part of the lie the administration pushed day after day about the attack, it was about the video and her comment "what difference does it make".
Since you applied quotes to your crass statement you suggested I wrote it, and that makes you 100% false and a liar.
Hillary Clinton released the Benghazi chapter from her new book to Politico. She obviously wants everything out way in advance for her run for the White House. And scolding Republicans for politicizing the attack on the backs of the four dead Americans.
Mornin Mtm. :2wave: Well and that Part about her.....not checking back on her people to see if they made out Alive. So while she may try to push some narrative. There are two other books out that are Ripping her open. So she will be needing a new mouth piece.
Her hope was that this would all be forgotten by the time the Election came round. Now that its not she has to try and cover herself. Problem is she told the Nation she would take responsibility. Now she will pay the price.....should she jump.
Which if it becomes to much.....and all start focusing on her not checking back on her people. She will be toast. Then wont even decide to run.
the cloud that will always hang over her head is being part of the lie the administration pushed day after day about the attack, it was about the video and her comment "what difference does it make".
Clinton defends the intelligence at the time preceding the attack on the American compound in Benghazi. An anti-Islamic video that had sparked a protest at an embassy in Cairo was proved in “later investigation and reporting,” including by The New York Times, to have been “indeed a factor” in what happened in Benghazi, Clinton writes.
That point is among those that has been debated during hearings into the attacks.
“There were scores of attackers that night, almost certainly with differing motives,” she writes. “It is inaccurate to state that every single one of them was influenced by this hateful video. It is equally inaccurate to state that none of them were. Both assertions defy not only the evidence but logic as well.”
i think she would lying to herself if she believes this is somehow going away by the time she announces her run for president.
From the article in question.
Exclusive: Hillary Clinton
why are we blaming her for relying on the intelligence they had at the time?
From the article in question.
Exclusive: Hillary Clinton
why are we blaming her for relying on the intelligence they had at the time?
Well like a typical Liberal Democrat.....she thinks because she uttered the words. She takes responsibility. There has been no consequences due to her major failure at State. They tried to pump her resume with the Frequent Flyer Miles. Plus even tho she hurried and pivoted away from the video, she can't get around the fact. That she.....Hillary Clinton. Wife of former President Bill Clinton. Didn't tell BO to place the country on High Alert around the 11th Anniversary of 911. It was her job.....to keep not just those in Benghazi safe. But All those abroad overseas. (not counting Military).
even thou i don't like kerry, he has done more in his short tenure as SOS then clinton did in 4 years.
Its been debunked.....there was no protest. So she can defend all she wants. Overseas New Sources have reported it as well.
Moreover.....all she is doing is trying to cover. That She and her Dept. Hired Ansar Al Sharia as Security for Benghazi. Another fact she can't get around.
you don't seem to accept the idea that the administration was only acting on information that seemed accurate at the time.
why is that answer reasonable.
you don't seem to accept the idea that the administration was only acting on information that seemed accurate at the time.
why is that answer reasonable.
Because they knew who it was that was attacking us before that month of Sept. You don't seem to accept the answer that the Public wasn't being told that State Hired Ansar al Sharia.....a group that is associated with AQ and really technically an Off shoot of the morphing thereof.
That Hillary was quite aware they were Hired. As she showed up a couple of months prior and added security was put in place. By Her! Libyan Security.....she Hired.
One doesn't.....let the enemy in, and then give them the Keys to the doors. KnowwhatImean UWS!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?