- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,116
- Reaction score
- 33,462
- Location
- SE Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Former White House National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor went on Fox News on Thursday, and after host Brett Baier grilled him over the issue of the talking points used after the attack, he finally responded with, "Dude, this was like two years ago."
Throughout the exchange, Vietor — who seemed annoyed at the line of questioning — wasn't really able to answer Baier on various questions, telling him he "believes so" or that he didn't remember.
"You don't remember?" Baier asked, to which Vietor responded, "Dude, this was like two years ago. We're still talking about the most mundane process ... we're talking about the process of editing talking points. That's what bureaucrats do all day long."
NSC Spokesman On Benghazi: Dude, That Was Two Years Ago - Business Insider
The brazen arrogance is familiar isn't it? It's what we've come to expect of an elitist, egotistical, maniacal administration.
No, American. The blatant arrogance belongs to those who have been passionately screaming "Benghazi" for political points the last few years, yet don't give one flying **** about those who died.
Did you not wish you could reach into the screen and smack that snotty little Tommy bastard?NSC Spokesman On Benghazi: Dude, That Was Two Years Ago - Business Insider
The brazen arrogance is familiar isn't it? It's what we've come to expect of an elitist, egotistical, maniacal administration.
No, American. The blatant arrogance belongs to those who have been passionately screaming "Benghazi" for political points the last few years, yet don't give one flying **** about those who died.
No, American. The blatant arrogance belongs to those who have been passionately screaming "Benghazi" for political points the last few years, yet don't give one flying **** about those who died.
Which is precisely why the Obama administration spared nothing to go to Libya and capture and kill the attackers, and successfully did so shortly after the attack.
Obama couldn't even be bothered to walk downstairs to the situation room at the WH while bullets were still flying. Hillary couldn't be bothered for months to sign off on increased security at a consulate in a war zone.
They should both be offered the Ambassadorship to Libya in 2017.
No, American. The blatant arrogance belongs to those who have been passionately screaming "Benghazi" for political points the last few years, yet don't give one flying **** about those who died.
NSC Spokesman On Benghazi: Dude, That Was Two Years Ago - Business Insider
The brazen arrogance is familiar isn't it? It's what we've come to expect of an elitist, egotistical, maniacal administration.
Exactly right.Which is precisely why the Obama administration spared nothing to go to Libya and capture and kill the attackers, and successfully did so shortly after the attack.
Exactly right.
And make sure they're the first to accuse the other guy of what they themselves are doing.
You see it time and again.
Obama couldn't even be bothered to walk downstairs to the situation room at the WH while bullets were still flying. Hillary couldn't be bothered for months to sign off on increased security at a consulate in a war zone.
They should both be offered the Ambassadorship to Libya in 2017.
Did you not wish you could reach into the screen and smack that snotty little Tommy bastard?
The degree to which a person will acknowledge they see it, is how you can tell the regular fanboys from the diehard fanboys from the complicit fanboys.
For example, these are a complicit fanboys.
View attachment 67165764
"We are going to bring those who killed our fellow Americans to justice,"Good morning, bubba. :2wave:
:agree: What's more, since they are trying very hard to make Benghazi sound like "old" news, and not worthy of further discussion, why is it that they can constantly bring up things that Bush did or said five or more years ago...talk about "old" news....! The reason Benghazi is still news is because too many explanations have been given that contradict each other, so we still don't know all the truth about what really happened and why - and no finality can be reached to put this terrible incident to rest.and until justice is done this will continue to be in the news, like it or not!The thug rapist/killers of the Ambassador and three other Americans are still running around free,
Pete's in one of his bitchy moods today.And we have post #10 which has already been proven false so many times it's embarrassing to see it repeated again. We are encouraged to believe that two CIA operatives left their posts to assist in the witnessing of a spontaneous demonstration of heavy mortar proficiency.
"We are going to bring those who killed our fellow Americans to justice,"
"No act of terror will go unpunished,"
Pete's in one of his bitchy moods today.
"We are going to bring those who killed our fellow Americans to justice,"
"No act of terror will go unpunished,"
No, American. The blatant arrogance belongs to those who have been passionately screaming "Benghazi" for political points the last few years, yet don't give one flying **** about those who died.
Representative Peter King, chairman of the House homeland security committee, emerged just after 9am to say the hearing before his committee was over. He said there were discrepancies between what Petraeus had previously told the committee about the Benghazi attack and what he said on Friday.
King said that earlier, Petraeus had said it was principally a reaction to an anti-Muslim video produced in the US; on Friday he said it was an attack by extremists.
Five days after the attack, the administration sent UN ambassador Susan Rice on the Sunday news shows to describe it as a spontaneous protest. Rice relied on initial intelligence that proved incorrect, and she is now under attack by some Republican senators who vow to block her if she's nominated as secretary of state when Hillary Clinton steps down.
Petraeus testimony on Benghazi contradicts previous House statement | World news | theguardian.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?