• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ex-Rand Paul Aide Pardoned By trump Is Charged With Funneling Russian Money Into 2016 Election

Liberal7360

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 16, 2021
Messages
7,292
Reaction score
11,773
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
This time? The story was from last year

From this story
"The announcement came on Monday via an unseal indictment from 9 September."

From a story dated: Sep 20, 2021, 8:18 PM
"In an unsealed indictment, dated September 9,"


Someone had posted this on the breaking news forum as well but there is no new information that we can find
 
Pretty inefficient laundering. Russian gives creep $100,000, creep keeps $75,000 and gives $25,000 to candidate (apparently trump).
 
This time? The story was from last year

From this story
"The announcement came on Monday via an unseal indictment from 9 September."

From a story dated: Sep 20, 2021, 8:18 PM
"In an unsealed indictment, dated September 9,"


Someone had posted this on the breaking news forum as well but there is no new information that we can find
The indictment is from September, not the story. The indictment was just unsealed. The story is from two days ago.

This is new information.
 
The indictment is from September, not the story. The indictment was just unsealed. The story is from two days ago.

This is new information.

As I pointed out it is not, the indictment was unsealed in the September 20th 2021 article
 
As I pointed out it is not, the indictment was unsealed in the September 20th 2021 article
At a glance, your link and the one in the OP look the same. I mistook them as such. Yes, interesting why another author chose to re-report the story.
 
Back
Top Bottom