- Joined
- Mar 6, 2005
- Messages
- 7,536
- Reaction score
- 429
- Location
- Upper West Side of Manhattan (10024)
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/w...gin&adxnnlx=1175428864-SJosxXZ0d0wD4HUAvvSu6QEx-Aide Details a Loss of Faith in the President
By JIM RUTENBERG
Published: April 1, 2007
AUSTIN, Tex., March 29 — In 1999, Matthew Dowd became a symbol of George W. Bush’s early success at positioning himself as a Republican with Democratic appeal.
Karl Rove and Matthew Dowd talked as President Bush spoke at a campaign rally in 2004 in Canton, Ohio.
A top strategist for the Texas Democrats who was disappointed by the Bill Clinton years, Mr. Dowd was impressed by the pledge of Mr. Bush, then governor of Texas, to bring a spirit of cooperation to Washington. He switched parties, joined Mr. Bush’s political brain trust and dedicated the next six years to getting him to the Oval Office and keeping him there. In 2004, he was appointed the president’s chief campaign strategist.(snip)
Looking back, Mr. Dowd now says his faith in Mr. Bush was misplaced. (snip)
He criticized the president as failing to call the nation to a shared sense of sacrifice at a time of war, failing to reach across the political divide to build consensus and ignoring the will of the people on Iraq. He said he believed the president had not moved aggressively enough to hold anyone accountable for the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, and that Mr. Bush still approached governing with a “my way or the highway” mentality reinforced by a shrinking circle of trusted aides.
“I really like him, which is probably why I’m so disappointed in things,” he said. He added, “I think he’s become more, in my view, secluded and bubbled in.”
In speaking out, Mr. Dowd became the first member of Mr. Bush’s inner circle to break so publicly with him.
What should be most interesting is to see how GOP candidates shun Bush as they run for office in 2008. I betcha that very few will ask Bush to campaign for them unless it's a blow out race. Any closely contested election will necessitate that Bush stay away in order to not harm the GOP candidate.I saw this article on NYTimes's home page and printed it out. I will read it later. But I am very proud of Matthew Dowd for coming out and speaking his mind. Good for him.
September 11th was a devastating day for the United States. That was a time we all came together. However, George Bush took that goodwill we had for each other and the goodwill that other countries had towards us, and he tore us apart. Our country is more divided now than I have ever seen it. Other countries think we are arrogant a$$es as a result of the way this president carries himself.
My brother was a die-hard Bush fan and has been completely repulsed by his behavior over the last month. I hope that slowly those who are rational and on the right will turn their backs on this arrogant president.
They did that during the 2006 campaign.What should be most interesting is to see how GOP candidates shun Bush as they run for office in 2008. I betcha that very few will ask Bush to campaign for them unless it's a blow out race. Any closely contested election will necessitate that Bush stay away in order to not harm the GOP candidate.
Nothing like another unsubstantiated and unproven attack post! NICE!He's a political hack, a campiagn manager/advisor who first did this to Clinton at the end of his term and now is doing the same to Bush.
How much you wanna bet he picks another leading candidate to try to get a job with to hold him over for the next 6 years?
Dan Bartlett, the White House counselor, said Mr. Dowd’s criticism is reflective of the national debate over the war.
“It’s an issue that divides people,” Mr. Bartlett said. “Even people that supported the president aren’t immune from having their own feelings and emotions.”
He said he disagreed with Mr. Dowd’s description of the president as isolated and with his position on withdrawal. He said Mr. Dowd, a friend, has “sometimes expressed these sentiments” in private conversation, though “not in such detail.”
(snip)
In television interviews in 2004, Mr. Dowd said that Mr. Kerry’s campaign was proposing “a weak defense,” and that the voters “trust this president more than they trust Senator Kerry on Iraq.”
But he was starting to have his own doubts by then, he said.
He said he thought Mr. Bush handled the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks well but “missed a real opportunity to call the country to a shared sense of sacrifice.”
(snip)
“I think we should design campaigns that appeal not to 51 percent of the people,” he said, “but bring the country together as a whole.”
(snip)
His views against the war began to harden last spring when, in a personal exercise, he wrote a draft opinion article and found himself agreeing with Mr. Kerry’s call for withdrawal from Iraq. He acknowledged that the expected deployment of his son Daniel was an important factor.
He said the president’s announcement last fall that he was re-nominating the former United Nations ambassador John R. Bolton, whose confirmation Democrats had already refused, was further proof to him that Mr. Bush was not seeking consensus with Democrats.
How much you wanna bet he picks another leading candidate to try to get a job with to hold him over for the next 6 years?
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/washington/01adviser.html?pagewanted=2&hpMr. Dowd does not seem prepared to put his views to work in 2008.
Nothing like another unsubstantiated and unproven attack post! NICE!
Funny thing is if you would bother to read the story you would have read these points:
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/washington/01adviser.html?pagewanted=2&hp
I love how when someone speaks from the heart against the President and he happens to be a Bushie he automatically gets labeled a "hack" by the radical right wingers in this Forum!
So tell me Stinger what you think of Dick Morris?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?