• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Evicted native white farmer returns to his farm in Rhodesia (Zimbabwe )


Corruption in African countries is hindering economic, political and social development. It is a major barrier to economic growth, good governance and basic freedoms, such as freedom of speech or citizens’ right to hold governments to account.

It’s almost as if the utter failure of colonial regimes to promote actual good governance practices before they abandoned the continent has had major lingering effects.
 
It’s almost as if the utter failure of colonial regimes to promote actual good governance practices before they abandoned the continent has had major lingering effects.

Er, there is far more corruption in Africa now than there ever was in the days of colonisation.

As the former leader of Singapore said :

"before the British arrived, there was no organised human society in Singapore"
 
Er, there is far more corruption in Africa now than there ever was in the days of colonisation.

As the former leader of Singapore said :

"before the British arrived, there was no organised human society in Singapore"

That’s like saying “Before the Soviets arrived, there was no organized human society in Magnitogorsk. No shit. They founded the city.
 
Er, there is far more corruption in Africa now than there ever was in the days of colonisation.

As the former leader of Singapore said :

"before the British arrived, there was no organised human society in Singapore"

Err, no amount of desperate squirming from you changes the fact that your idols wrecked the continent
 
That’s like saying “Before the Soviets arrived, there was no organized human society in Magnitogorsk. No shit. They founded the city.
“Before the Soviets arrived, there was no organized human society in Magnitogorsk

50189FF600000578-0-image-a-3_1536793208081.jpg
 
in the death camp format but you like and support it

You again lie ....

Magnitogorsk was founded in 1743 as part of the Orenburg Line of forts built during the reign of the Empress Elizabeth. By 1747 the settlement had grown large enough to justify the building of a small wooden chapel, later named "the Church of the Holy Trinity".
 
That’s like saying “Before the Soviets arrived, there was no organized human society in Magnitogorsk. No shit. They founded the city.

Utter nonsense.

Africans, especially in Central and Southern Africa, were living in mud huts and wearing animal skins before colonisation.....just like the Brits were before the Romans invaded.
 
One of the grandees of Singapore’s foreign policy establishment, Tommy Koh :

“the British did leave us with a positive legacy”.

“This includes the English language, the free port, free trade, open economy, good infrastructure, the rule of law, a good civil service and police force, town planning, public hygiene and modern medicine, a belief in science and modernity and an appreciation of nature and natural history.”
 
Utter nonsense.

Africans, especially in Central and Southern Africa, were living in mud huts and wearing animal skins before colonisation.....just like the Brits were before the Romans invaded.
the maxists hate the history , they hate the civilization (with gay - rights, universities , railways , universal human rights , etc.) they say like much then exotic despots than our the liberal order leaders
 
Utter nonsense.

Africans, especially in Central and Southern Africa, were living in mud huts and wearing animal skins before colonisation.....just like the Brits were before the Romans invaded.

Or blonde haired, blue eyed Germanics prior to being giving civilization by brown and olive skinned people from the Mediterranean. So those lily whiteGermanics were naturally inferior, right?
 
the maxists hate the history , they hate the civilization (with gay - rights, universities , railways , universal human rights , etc.) they say like much then exotic despots than our the liberal order leaders

Just a note, @Ginza, Litwin here, the guy on your side, celebrates Nazis.
 
Just a note, @Ginza, Litwin here, the guy on your side, celebrates Nazis.
I celebrate The LO only , which is the best thing which has happened on the earth , you guys suggest that the oriental despots, satraps , communist dictatorships, tribal socialites are better in the same time you dont want to live in Omsk, Zimbabwe, NK etc.

 
I celebrate The LO only , which is the best thing which has happened on the earth , you guys suggest that the oriental despots, satraps , communist dictatorships, tribal socialites are better in the same time you dont want to live in Omsk, Zimbabwe, NK etc.


You have celebrated members of the Nazi SS in multiple threads.
 
I celebrate The LO only , which is the best thing which has happened on the earth , you guys suggest that the oriental despots, satraps , communist dictatorships, tribal socialites are better in the same time you dont want to live in Omsk, Zimbabwe, NK etc.


You certainly do celebrate the Waffen SS.....which is NOT, in fact, part of the “liberal order”. You spew racist blather about “orientals” while cheerleading for tyrants like Azerbaijan’s Aliyev, which makes your rhetoric especially hollow.
 
I celebrate The LO only , which is the best thing which has happened on the earth , you guys suggest that the oriental despots, satraps , communist dictatorships, tribal socialites are better in the same time you dont want to live in Omsk, Zimbabwe, NK etc.


That is a lie.

You cheer Oriental Despots as long as they aren't RUSSIA.
 
...

You cheer Oriental Despots as long as they aren't RUSSIA.
a TV.ru lie, we tactically sometimes support enemy of our enemy . do you agree that Moscow is N1 challenger- foe of the LO?
 
a TV.ru lie, we tactically sometimes support enemy of our enemy . do you agree that Moscow is N1 challenger- foe of the LO?

You lie.

You cheer Oriental Despots as long as they aren't RUSSIA

You cheer Nazi SS.

And any "LO" that cheers the Nazis is no "LO".
 
It’s almost as if the utter failure of colonial regimes to promote actual good governance practices before they abandoned the continent has had major lingering effects.

You mean 'gave African countries the independence they wanted'. Those who were so 'bigoted' to suggest that African weren't ready to properly govern themselves are proven right on a daily basis. Africa is still one big shit-hole 60 years on.
 
You mean 'gave African countries the independence they wanted'. Those who were so 'bigoted' to suggest that African weren't ready to properly govern themselves are proven right on a daily basis. Africa is still one big shit-hole 60 years on.

Given that European countries had already ruled many of these areas for close to a century, they “not being ready for independence” is nothing more than yet another damning indictment of the colonizers.
 
You mean 'gave African countries the independence they wanted'. Those who were so 'bigoted' to suggest that African weren't ready to properly govern themselves are proven right on a daily basis. Africa is still one big shit-hole 60 years on.

They weren't ready to govern themselves BY DESIGN of the colonizers.
 
Then why are they no closer to figuring it out after 60 years? Sorry, but that excuse is bollocks.

Let’s look at one example: the Congo.

When the Belgians left, less than a dozen native Congolese had college degrees and there were zero institutions of higher learning in the entire country. How long do you think it takes to make up for something like that?

Do you think an entire educational base can be built by a country with basically no resources in 60 years?

And why did they have no institutions of higher learning? Because the Belgians didn’t want educated Congolese. They just wanted rubber, uranium, and other raw materials extracted at the cheapest price possible.
 
Back
Top Bottom