- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 34,951
- Reaction score
- 16,312
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Republicans and Democrats have long been divided on the purpose of the House committee investigating the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans. GOP lawmakers, particularly the committee's chair, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), have insisted the panel is focused on investigating potential wrongdoing leading up to the attack, while Democrats have alleged that the GOP-led committee is a political stunt targeting Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton.
But after the former secretary of state's marathon testimony on Thursday, in which she endured 11 hours of questioning, even conservatives admitted the hearing accomplished very little.
Washington Examiner columnist Byron York, disappointed the hearing had been "billed as an epic, High Noon-style confrontation," concluded the day was "a bust."
"In other words, no big deal. And that is very, very good news for Hillary Clinton," York wrote.
Right-wing radio host Erick Erickson wrote that the hearing "was all a political spectacle" and "a waste of time."
"God bless Trey Gowdy for trying to learn the facts and understand what happened. But the rest of it was just a carnival road show of back bench congresscritters playing to the cameras and Hillary Clinton working hard to play persecuted victim," Erickson wrote.
Some acknowledged that committee members asked questions that were bizarre and unnecessary.
At one point on Thursday, Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) bombarded Clinton with a series of questions about her accessibility to Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was killed in the attack. He alleged that Stevens, one of hundreds of diplomatic officials Clinton oversaw as secretary of state, should have had close contact with Clinton.
Read more @: Even Conservatives Realize Hillary Clintons Benghazi Committee Hearing Was Ridiculous
Well.... I bet Clinton is gonna ride this ****ing joke of a "hearing" to the presidency. She is gonna use this to her advantage. What a ****ing hack show. [/FONT][/COLOR]
Turned out to be a pretty good campaign stump for her and it didn't cost her a dime.
Exactly.
The Republicans spend 11 hours (!) grilling her over what looks like a screw up on her part, and she comes off looking more presidential while they look like idiots.
Meanwhile, they seem determined to run Donald Trump against her.
It's almost like the RNC is trying to get Hillary Clinton elected president.
Read more @: Even Conservatives Realize Hillary Clintons Benghazi Committee Hearing Was Ridiculous
Well.... I bet Clinton is gonna ride this ****ing joke of a "hearing" to the presidency. She is gonna use this to her advantage. What a ****ing hack show. [/FONT][/COLOR]
Read more @: Even Conservatives Realize Hillary Clintons Benghazi Committee Hearing Was Ridiculous
Well.... I bet Clinton is gonna ride this ****ing joke of a "hearing" to the presidency. She is gonna use this to her advantage. What a ****ing hack show. [/FONT][/COLOR]
Why did Gowdy refuse to release Blumenthal's testimony transcripts to the public? He kept talking about full transparency then refused such a simple request.In your dreams. You look at stuff like this and see the Hildebeast performing well. But conservatives look at the same event and see her lying and ugly under pressure. And what sort of fool would take the HuffPost's word on conservative thought?
In your dreams. You look at stuff like this and see the Hildebeast performing well. But conservatives look at the same event and see her lying and ugly under pressure. And what sort of fool would take the HuffPost's word on conservative thought?
Read more @: Even Conservatives Realize Hillary Clintons Benghazi Committee Hearing Was Ridiculous
Well.... I bet Clinton is gonna ride this ****ing joke of a "hearing" to the presidency. She is gonna use this to her advantage. What a ****ing hack show. [/FONT][/COLOR]
:lamoIn your dreams. You look at stuff like this and see the Hildebeast performing well. But conservatives look at the same event and see her lying and ugly under pressure.
You see, the Huff Post piece is quoting CONSERVATIVES in the article.And what sort of fool would take the HuffPost's word on conservative thought?
Turned out to be a pretty good campaign stump for her and it didn't cost her a dime.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?