- Joined
- Oct 17, 2007
- Messages
- 11,862
- Reaction score
- 10,300
- Location
- New York
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Today, The Jerusalem Post reported:
Six months after the international community was aghast to learn that coriander was on a list of items not allowed into the Gaza Strip, the shops there – according to EU diplomat Christian Berger – are now full of consumer goods. The problem, he said, is that few people have the money to buy them…
Berger said, however, that in order for people to be able to buy the goods there needed to be vast improvements in the economy that could only come about if there were greater freedom of movement of people in and out of Gaza, and if exports were facilitated. Currently, he said, the only goods allowed for export were flowers and strawberries to the Netherlands.
Unlike the hysterical, exaggerated, and one-sided politicized rhetoric of some officials e.g., the departing Richard Falk, Mr. Berger provides another example of a more constructive approach to addressing problems where they might exist. Rather than claiming that a humanitarian catastrophe is unfolding in the Gaza Strip—a claim that would be without foundation—or making knee-jerk demands for Israel to eliminate its maritime blockade of the Gaza Strip (a policy intended to serve Israel’s security needs), Mr. Berger focused on details where problems exist.
Given their substantive and constructive nature, the points raised by Mr. Berger can offer an area for discussion aimed at refining the blockade so as to serve the combination of strengthening Israel’s security, addressing humanitarian issues in the Gaza Strip, and limiting Hamas’ ability to use the changes to strengthen its regime and influence. Although trade-offs would be necessary e.g., complete freedom of movement is not possible given the continuing terrorist threat from Hamas and allied terrorist organizations, focused discussion might lead to additional changes in product mix and expanded opportunities for private sector economic development.
Six months after the international community was aghast to learn that coriander was on a list of items not allowed into the Gaza Strip, the shops there – according to EU diplomat Christian Berger – are now full of consumer goods. The problem, he said, is that few people have the money to buy them…
Berger said, however, that in order for people to be able to buy the goods there needed to be vast improvements in the economy that could only come about if there were greater freedom of movement of people in and out of Gaza, and if exports were facilitated. Currently, he said, the only goods allowed for export were flowers and strawberries to the Netherlands.
Unlike the hysterical, exaggerated, and one-sided politicized rhetoric of some officials e.g., the departing Richard Falk, Mr. Berger provides another example of a more constructive approach to addressing problems where they might exist. Rather than claiming that a humanitarian catastrophe is unfolding in the Gaza Strip—a claim that would be without foundation—or making knee-jerk demands for Israel to eliminate its maritime blockade of the Gaza Strip (a policy intended to serve Israel’s security needs), Mr. Berger focused on details where problems exist.
Given their substantive and constructive nature, the points raised by Mr. Berger can offer an area for discussion aimed at refining the blockade so as to serve the combination of strengthening Israel’s security, addressing humanitarian issues in the Gaza Strip, and limiting Hamas’ ability to use the changes to strengthen its regime and influence. Although trade-offs would be necessary e.g., complete freedom of movement is not possible given the continuing terrorist threat from Hamas and allied terrorist organizations, focused discussion might lead to additional changes in product mix and expanded opportunities for private sector economic development.