• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Eric Bolling Accuser Is Anti-Trump Professor Who Also Accused Bill O’Reilly

Guy sends a dick pic and people here defend him. Clearly these people will defend Trump no matter what the evidence because they don't care about the truth. It's just an us vs them thing.
 

Well sure, that is going to tend be your response when I agree with Rush:

Limbaugh: New Fox News Leaders Want To Make Changes, But Also Make Money

Rush being an astute observer of this sort of thing as a lifelong expert in this sort of thing....learning by experience.....in this sort of thing.
 
Last edited:

I've seen her on Fox she's not even tenured at a not highly rated college that was probably one of the
few accredited colleges Obama was able to get accepted at.
 
lurchadams said:
:funny

Well, if you're going to quote someone whose opinions are as clearly "down the center" as Rush Limbaugh, how could anyone argue with that?
Click to expand...

TRUE/Not TRUE is the knife cut that counts most of all, when it comes to major media and the Murdocks as well Rush tends to be on the side of TRUE.

I am being as serious as a heart attack here.

 
Last edited:

Not unless they ask for one is a good rule to live by, and trust me they rarely ask for one...
 

I am no fan of Bolling, but this seems so out of character. But you never know.
 
Are these idiot Murdock kids now found to be dumping upon their very own moneymakers based upon no evidence, based upon on words of people is may not like them very much only??

Enquiring minds would like to know.

The Dude says it never happened.

TEXT

?
 

Eric Bolling says it never happened?

Where is he saying that?
 

The Murdock kids have a materially different view of where they want to take their business. It seems they want a more mainstream network that will have viewer interest beyond the U.S.
 
washunut said:
The Murdock kids have a materially different view of where they want to take their business. It seems they want a more mainstream network that will have viewer interest beyond the U.S.
Click to expand...

And they clearly want a lot more fresh scrubbed (AKA Young) faces around.
 

Exactly, so it would be pretty stupid to act all innocent when the truth will come out, and everyone knows that the truth will come out.

He with lawyer assistance adds a lie to the country to the list of indictments?

On Purpose, with the jig will be up in days if not hours?

See my point?
 

No. Again, O'Reilly, regularly denied and spoke out harshly against the accusations and the accusers. So I'm not surprised Bolling's lawyer denied the charges.

Some people have their reputations on the line though, on both sides.
 
Gina said:
No. Again, O'Reilly, regularly denied and spoke out harshly against the accusations and the accusers. So I'm not surprised Bolling's lawyer denied the charges.

Some people have their reputations on the line though, on both sides.
Click to expand...

You dont get it...TEXT is what makes this different....COMPUTER EXPERTS can say with 100% certainty what happened, this is not icky goey consent and other human stuff like with O'MAN,
 
Hawkeye10 said:
You dont get it...TEXT is what makes this different....COMPUTER EXPERTS can say with 100% certainty what happened, this is not icky goey consent and other human stuff like with O'MAN,
Click to expand...

I already agreed to that.

Gina said:
Should be easy enough for the accusers to prove.
Click to expand...

Just because he denies it, doesn't mean it didn't happen.
 
Gina said:
I already agreed to that.



Just because he denies it, doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Click to expand...

I was raised to believe that evidence is required to accuse a man.

According to The Golden Rule.

SEE MY POINT?



"We are not children anymore, let's try so very hard to act like it", this I say to the ignorant and the weak....AKA my peers, modern Americans.

GO TEAM!
 
Last edited:

Being suspended does not mean they saw or proved anything, because if they did he would have been fired. Suspension is sop across many large companies and govt orgs often with pay for people suspected of a crime. The reason they do this is twofold, one the innocent until proven guilty thing, if they find out the women were lying to run a smear campaign and they had fired him, he could sue their pants off.

The second part is if a company just fires someone on accusations and not proof it scares away future talent, as no one worth their pay is going to work for a company that throws them under the bus with no proof, hence the suspension is sop and firing usually happens upon proof.
 
Politics is humanity at its worst.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
The Murdock Kids are determined to have a Fox News their liberal friends approve of. Pretty soon I expect there will be a Purity Test for all the help to pass. The place had a good run under Ailes. IT'S OVER
Click to expand...

Yeah I guess the drunken frat boy, grope and harass female co-worker days are behind Faux Noise... is kinda telling that some lament this... :roll:

Faux noise is just changing purity tests- from political rabid right 'purity' to moral, sexual harassment free workplace...

The Rabid Right seems unable to learn from the fall of others... sending your junk pics to those who don't ask for them is a bozo no-no... eace
 
I agree with the earlier post that this seems out of character. I'll freely admit I was disappointed in the news and hope it proves false. Bolling is not the kind of guy I switch channels to watch but he doesn't grate on me as much as some partisans. He actually seems more consistent in his views than many.

With O'Reilly, I thought this type of thing seemed much more in character and I was neither surprised by accusations or sorry to see him go. Unlike O'Reilly and others, I think Bolling knows it is better to just let the attorney's speak for him and once it is said and done, come out and applaud being exonerated or simply remain quiet and take your lumps in silence. I take his silence less as an admission of guilt and more him letting guys he is paying big bucks to earn those big bucks without him getting in the way.
 

We are as a people so bad about the erotic, so uptight, so ignorant, so afraid....I am not a fan of criminalizing people sending pics of themselves naked....as if we should be all ashamed of our bodies, as if showing who we are is cause for offense.

Anti-sexting laws can go bye-bye so far as I am concerned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…