- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 81,539
- Reaction score
- 66,513
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Enough gradualism with the anti-Russian responses — get tougher, now.
Can't say I disagree with any of the above.
If NATO is engaged in a proxy war with Russia, and US SecDef Austin says that we are, then stop the "dribs and drabs" assistence to Ukraine and provide them what they need to beat back Moscow's land-grab invasion.
Let's stop the naivety and sophistry. Russia is already preparing to kick-in Moldova's door.
4.26.22
Republican U.S. Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska is right to say that Interpol, the international policing facilitator, should expel Russia from its membership and, specifically, block Russian access to its databases. Sasse said Russia and China already use Interpol in multiple ways to suppress and abuse political adversaries. Please allow, however, a broader point. The very fact that Russia remains a member of Interpol is a symptom of a larger failing. Beginning not just with Russia’s armed invasion of Ukraine but during the months of Russian saber-rattling beforehand, the other nations of the world and their overhyped international organizations have been too slow and too weak in countering Russian aggression. The U.S. and other nations should have imposed sanctions against Russia as soon as Russia began amassing offensive troops at Ukraine’s borders. The free world also should have rushed all possible military assistance from the very beginning of hostilities, along with the strongest of sanctions, rather than trying an endless game of careful calibration of responses. It is likely the human suffering in Ukraine has been tremendously worse because assistance was trotted out in periodic segments and levels. If the goal is to help Ukraine repel the invasion, then for goodness sake, give Ukraine the means to repel it quickly and decisively rather than to stay one painful step ahead of the executioner.
Likewise, the incremental ramping up of the response makes it more likely, not less, that Russia will continue escalating to ever-more-dangerous degrees. Every time Vladimir Putin sees free-world hesitation, it gives him more reason to think that he can cause us to crack by upping his pressure just a little more. This is true in the nuclear-weapons context, too. The Russian doctrine of “escalate to de-escalate” is well known. If Putin believes that one-time use of small “tactical nukes” will force the West to accept a settlement favorable to Russia — and if the West’s endless bet-hedging shows as much fear as resolve — he is more likely to use nukes than if he is told, unambiguously, that any nuclear use will mean his own obliteration. So, by all means, expel Russia from Interpol. Then do what it takes to expel Russia from Ukraine altogether.
Can't say I disagree with any of the above.
If NATO is engaged in a proxy war with Russia, and US SecDef Austin says that we are, then stop the "dribs and drabs" assistence to Ukraine and provide them what they need to beat back Moscow's land-grab invasion.
Let's stop the naivety and sophistry. Russia is already preparing to kick-in Moldova's door.