Elizabeth Warren Demands That Amazon Hide Books

[jonny5]

That's not what she said.


If there's nothing unlawful, then there's no threat.

That is what she said. A US senator wrote a letter to a company saying their activity is potentially unlawful and to detail what they are doing about it. Clearly a threat.

 

[jonny5]

Then you have very thin skin. If Warren was the AG, yeah that would have some weight.

Legislators make the laws. And this doesnt exist in a vaccum. She has previously used her power to attack Amazon.

"And fight to break up Big Tech so you’re not powerful enough to heckle senators with snotty tweets. https://t.co/3vCAI93MST"

Is that a threat?

 

[wist43]

No way. The Constitution favors gay couples. They had every reason to sue the baker.

Think about what you're saying here - that the government is empowered to act positively toward one person/group at the expense of another.

That is not how freedom works my friend.

So acting against Jews would be okay if your misleaders told you the Constitution said it was okay??

Just b/c the government winks affectionately at your bigoted views does not make it right or lawful.

Seriously, think about what you're lending support to.

 

[Lafayette]

Then you have very thin skin. If Warren was the AG, yeah that would have some weight.

Warren is a member of the Senate. As Senator of the US government, she has all the legal recognition that she needs.

And dimwits should just drop the matter (regarding her) and move on.

But, no, we can't have that. Because said dimwits need something/anything to bitch-'n-moan about on a forum ... !

 

[Lafayette]

So acting against Jews would be okay if your misleaders told you the Constitution said it was okay??

Only if the Supreme Court agreed with that action. Which I doubt it would.

We-the-sheeple or even members of government (PotUS, Senate, HofR) do not interpret the Constitution in any given circumstance. That is the sole duty/responsibility of the Supreme Court.

Got it? The sole duty/responsibility of the Supreme Court, whose decision is final and irrevocable ...

PS: Which means we-the-sheeple should be concerned about "packing the Supreme Court" by presidents in order to influence their decisions (which are majorities). Which is what Donald Dork did during his presidency!

 

[wist43]

Independent news is true too if that means completely unbiased instead of merely not belonging to the Libertarian or Republican party.

I do not believe all leftist news, but the vast majority of it is a left lean of the proven facts - unlike right-wing news being intentional lies.

You're off on the wrong track here... when it comes to the MSM, including Fox, they are all corporate media.

They all report what they want as long as it is within the parameters of the Establishment's agenda - which is of course always skewed toward the globalist agenda, which necessarily is always promoting the leftist agenda.

The Establishment has always funded, promoted, and protected the left - they use the left and it's various fronts to attack Americanism, America's founding, the Constitution, the family, our rights, our economy, our manufacturing base, our currency, etc.

-----------------------------------

For someone who really digs for truth, I can attest to the fact that they are making it more and more difficult everyday.

Stories from independent journalists are very quickly scrubbed from the internet - at least if they begin to garner some attention.

Reporting the truth about the crimes of our corrupt government and corporate overlords is very dangerous and deadly business.

An example of this would be the assassination of an independent journalist from Malta, Daphne Caruana Galizia. She was reporting on the CIA and other crime syndicates using Malta banks to launder money - a very common practice.

The CIA killed her with a car bomb in 2017. They can easily manage the cover story because they control our media.

They killed another reporter in Mexico a couple of years ago, but I don't remember his name.

-----------------------------------

If you actually want to learn something, research Operation Gladio. The BBC actually did some good documentaries on it back in the 80's and 90's, and some other independent producers did as well. Some of those documentaries can still be found on YouTube.

Some of the attacks included the Piazza Fontana bombing in 1969, the Bologna train bombing in 1980, and the Oktoberfest bombing in 1980.

The CIA, MI6, and Mossad committed many terrorist acts, mainly in Europe, and killed thousands of innocent civilians.

Gladio is still operational. If there is a terrorist event anywhere in the world, there's a good chance Gladio is involved along the usual suspects of private black ops companies like Blackwater.

Bottom line is - pretty much every word being barked at you on your evening news is bullshit.

 

[Lafayette]

R-R TRASH

Bottom line is - pretty much every word being barked at you on your evening news is bullshit.

That's the bottom-line for your comment?

The Internet is so massive it is impossible to control entirely who is printing/reading what. And, I doubt what I read on the Internet and the same on TV (multiple stations) can all be "controlled" by any single national entity. Besides, on the Internet, "nationality of source" simply does not matter since there is none.

It's just impossible for news to be wholly biased against either the Left or the Right. With the redundancy of Internet-outlets being highly abundant the ability of controlling them-and-their-output is impossible. A Web news-site can be Left/Right or wholly in the Center - and there is nothing we can do about it.

So, let the Left-Middle-Right news-outlets do as they see fit - we are mostly all adults and we can recognize BS from anywhere when we see it online ...

 

[wist43]

R-R TRASH



That's the bottom-line for your comment?

The Internet is so massive it is impossible to control entirely who is printing/reading what. And, I doubt what I read on the Internet and the same on TV (multiple stations) can all be "controlled" by any single national entity. Besides, on the Internet, "nationality of source" simply does not matter since there is none.

It's just impossible for news to be wholly biased against either the Left or the Right. With the redundancy of Internet-outlets being highly abundant the ability of controlling them-and-their-output is impossible. A Web news-site can be Left/Right or wholly in the Center - and there is nothing we can do about it.

So, let the Left-Middle-Right news-outlets do as they see fit - we are mostly all adults and we can recognize BS from anywhere when we see it online ...

The Establishment allows alternative media to carry on because it is not a threat.

But who accesses that media?? Very few people.

The vast majority of Americans consume very little news content, but what they do take in is canned, corporate propaganda.

Haven't you ever seen the canned scripts that are repeated by every news broadcast??



That was the Sinclair one I think, but they all do it. Not surprisingly, YouTube has scrubbed most of the clips and stories I used to use to make this point. The left news outlets literally parrot the talking points of the Democratic Party verbatim.

The BS is just repeated over and over... in the end, it forms the foundation of misinformation that the masses assume is true.

 

[The Stars Tremble]

That is what she said. A US senator wrote a letter to a company saying their activity is potentially unlawful and to detail what they are doing about it. Clearly a threat.

It's 49 Senators short of being a threat, but clutch those pearls darling.

 

[Lord of Planar]

The Establishment allows alternative media to carry on because it is not a threat.

But who accesses that media?? Very few people.

The vast majority of Americans consume very little news content, but what they do take in is canned, corporate propaganda.

Haven't you ever seen the canned scripts that are repeated by every news broadcast??



That was the Sinclair one I think, but they all do it. Not surprisingly, YouTube has scrubbed most of the clips and stories I used to use to make this point. The left news outlets literally parrot the talking points of the Democratic Party verbatim.

The BS is just repeated over and over... in the end, it forms the foundation of misinformation that the masses assume is true.

Indoctrination.

Repeat the same thing often enough...

 

[wist43]

Warren is a member of the Senate. As Senator of the US government, she has all the legal recognition that she needs.

And dimwits should just drop the matter (regarding her) and move on.

But, no, we can't have that. Because said dimwits need something/anything to bitch-'n-moan about on a forum ... !

She doesn't have any legal standing - none.

Are you French?? Do you understand anything about American governance at all??

 

[wist43]

Indoctrination.

Repeat the same thing often enough...

Yes, it is obvious if you are not in the middle of the whirlwind.

Most people think they are smart enough to discern fact from propaganda.

Of course they are completely overmatched, and haven't the first clue about how controlled and manipulated really they are.

 

[Lafayette]

The Establishment allows alternative media to carry on because it is not a threat.

But who accesses that media?? Very few people.

Your stating a "fact" without any proof whatsoever.

Unfitting in a "Debate Forum" where factual evidence must be substantiated.

Try harder ...

 

[Lafayette]

Are you French?? Do you understand anything about American governance at all??

Blah, blah, blah. I'm a Yank who lives in France - and so what?

Which is the Prime Reason I can post factual-evidence of comparative economic-data on this forum between the only two developed state-wise entities on earth that have mutual-correspondence politically/economically. (The US has 50 states and the EU 27 - the latter having a larger population.)

Personal attacks are typical of the Rabid-Right. You've shown your political true-colours ...

PS: There must be Center-Right people on this forum, but where are they? For the moment, that groupement is well-known in Europe - but seems non-existent in the US. Did the Replicants purge the Republican-party of them?

 

[Lafayette]

WHEN CHILDREN PLAY WITH GUNS

She doesn't have any legal standing - none.

Are you French?? Do you understand anything about American governance at all??

Nope, I'm a Yank living in France and I VOTE IN THE USA! (I am not a French-citizen.)

What I understand about American governance is "comparative". That is the US vs the EU.

It's an interesting comparison given that the US is so backward in Social-Services for its population and the EU so well advanced. (For instance, we live 3/4 years longer in Europe than you do in the US.) But Uncle Sam can spend bundles-upon-bundles of money on the DoD when there is no war to fight.

(Unless we start one! And we just ended one-such-war that Replicant PotUS Bushy-boy got us into and we did not know how to get out for 20-years! Military deaths amounted to 2400!)

Such murderous damage happens when "children play with guns".

Now YOU tell me that lifespan has nothing to do with the Total Medical-care one receives throughout their lifetime ... !

 

[jonny5]

It's 49 Senators short of being a threat, but clutch those pearls darling.

Ok, pal.