Respecthelect
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Messages
- 2,470
- Reaction score
- 969
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Guns are the evil culprit according to Democrats who eagerly seek to eliminate them. Why don't those same Democrats want to eliminate chemical weapons? We hear every other Syrian argument, punish Assad, retaliate, regime change, for the "children" and on-and-on. But, no mention of eliminating the chemical weapon itself? In fact, the president specifically excluded chemical sites from his target list? Legal guns must be destroyed, but chemical weapons survive? Someone please explain this incongruous dissonance please?