- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 112,271
- Reaction score
- 102,491
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
7.23.25
In a dissenting opinion against the Supreme Court's decision on Wednesday to allow President Donald Trump to remove Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the conservative majority has "all but overturned" a landmark 1935 case. The CPSC works to protect people from dangerous products and "unreasonable risk of injuries associated with consumer products" by issuing recalls, enforcing standards, banning products and suing noncompliant companies. The three terminated Democratic commissioners were nominated by former President Joe Biden and set to serve seven-year terms. The CPSC board is composed of five people, and requires a partisan split. The case Kagan refers to in her dissent, Humphrey's Executor v. United States, established that the president cannot fire independent board members without cause. The three CPSC commissioners had previously been fired by Trump in May, then reinstated by a federal judge. However, following that decision, the Justice Department filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court, claiming that the agency fell under Trump's control and he can remove them without cause. The High Court on Wednesday granted the stay application, allowing Trump to oust the commissioners. Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, wrote in an X post Wednesday: "The CPSC assures that families & children, homes & businesses, are protected from defective, dangerous products. Dismantling this independent, bipartisan agency—as Trump seeks—is a dire disservice."
The Constitution makes the President, not Congress or the Judiciary, head of the Executive Branch.
So the Court rules that constitution says its pointless for Congress to create independent agencies free of political pressure.
Is that a good thing?
Welcome to despotism.Elena Kagan warns Supreme Court just "all but overturned" 90-year precedent
The High Court's three liberal judges dissented as the majority allowed Trump to remove members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.www.newsweek.com
The Roberts Supreme Court doesn't even try to hide it anymore. They are advancing the principle of the "unitary executive theory", and the demands of über-conservative organizations such as the Federalist Society.
By 2028, Donald Trump will hold total power over every man, woman, and agency in the Executice Branch. With the Roberts Court acting as a legal shield, there will be no protections against a dictatorship.
Still waiting for you to explain how ignoring this precedent helps the American people. Besides Trump and his cronies.The Constitution makes the President, not Congress or the Judiciary, head of the Executive Branch.
I'm sure we will hear the shrieks of how bad this is of a populist Democrat hell bent on revenge wins the presidency I'm sure.Elena Kagan warns Supreme Court just "all but overturned" 90-year precedent
The High Court's three liberal judges dissented as the majority allowed Trump to remove members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.www.newsweek.com
The Roberts Supreme Court doesn't even try to hide it anymore. They are advancing the principle of the "unitary executive theory", and the demands of über-conservative organizations such as the Federalist Society.
By 2028, Donald Trump will hold total power over every man, woman, and agency in the Executice Branch. With the Roberts Court acting as a legal shield, there will be no protections against a dictatorship.
Breaking precedents isn't exactly a bad thing, especially considering our nation's history. The question is why and to what end those precedents are broken.If precedence is irrelevant, what does the law even mean anymore?
Still waiting for you to explain how ignoring this precedent helps the American people. Besides Trump and his cronies.
Hopefully we'll be a People's Republic soon!Maga lives vicariously through Trump. A victory for him is a victory for "the people."
That's how authoritarianism works.
I'm saving this for a Democratic president.The Constitution makes the President, not Congress or the Judiciary, head of the Executive Branch.
Lets see them stick by these decisions when a Democrat is in the WH.
Those are my questions, as well.First, let's see if elections even matter any longer - see my sig.
Second, if they do, let's see if Dems will vote for anyone with the balls to use the new dictatorial powers to bring us back from authoritarianism. It's not often that those that end up at the top of a dictatorship restructure the system to give up that power easily.
Yes, it’s a very good thing for the Court to uphold the Constitution and for the country not to have Executive agencies that aren’t accountable to anyone.So the Court rules that constitution says its pointless for Congress to create independent agencies free of political pressure.
Is that a good thing?
But the other branches Branchs are the checks and balances---------they are neglecting that roleThe Constitution makes the President, not Congress or the Judiciary, head of the Executive Branch.
Then tell Congress to stop delegating its authority to the Executive Branch.But the other branches Branchs are the checks and balances---------they are neglecting that role
yes-----that comes through OUR vote. We are putting the wrong people in office (MAGAs)Then tell Congress to stop delegating its authority to the Executive Branch.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?