- Joined
- Mar 3, 2018
- Messages
- 16,876
- Reaction score
- 7,398
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Nah. I'm gonna wait to see what the DailyCaller has to say."...declaring a national security emergency and seizing paper ballots..."
Yeah, uhh, Houston, we have a problem
A retired U.S. Army colonel who circulated a proposal to challenge the 2020 election, including by declaring a national security emergency and seizing paper ballots, said that he visited the White House on multiple occasions after the election, spoke with President Donald Trump’s chief of staff “maybe eight to 10 times” and briefed several members of Congress on the eve of the Jan. 6 riot.
Phil Waldron, the retired colonel, was working with Trump’s outside lawyers and was part of a team that briefed the lawmakers on a PowerPoint presentation detailing “Options for 6 JAN,” Waldron told The Washington Post. He said his contribution to the presentation focused on his claims of foreign interference in the vote, as did his discussions with the White House.
A version of the presentation made its way to the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, on Jan. 5. That information surfaced publicly this past week after the congressional committee investigating the insurrection released a letter that said Meadows had turned the document over to the committee.
It was a good plan. Perfectly legal."...declaring a national security emergency and seizing paper ballots..."
Yeah, uhh, Houston, we have a problem
A retired U.S. Army colonel who circulated a proposal to challenge the 2020 election, including by declaring a national security emergency and seizing paper ballots, said that he visited the White House on multiple occasions after the election, spoke with President Donald Trump’s chief of staff “maybe eight to 10 times” and briefed several members of Congress on the eve of the Jan. 6 riot.
Phil Waldron, the retired colonel, was working with Trump’s outside lawyers and was part of a team that briefed the lawmakers on a PowerPoint presentation detailing “Options for 6 JAN,” Waldron told The Washington Post. He said his contribution to the presentation focused on his claims of foreign interference in the vote, as did his discussions with the White House.
A version of the presentation made its way to the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, on Jan. 5. That information surfaced publicly this past week after the congressional committee investigating the insurrection released a letter that said Meadows had turned the document over to the committee.
Lol ok...It was a good plan. Perfectly legal.
If it had been implemented two weeks after the election, the fraud would have been uncovered and corrected.
He should be brought back to active duty and court-martialed."...declaring a national security emergency and seizing paper ballots..."
Yeah, uhh, Houston, we have a problem
A retired U.S. Army colonel who circulated a proposal to challenge the 2020 election, including by declaring a national security emergency and seizing paper ballots, said that he visited the White House on multiple occasions after the election, spoke with President Donald Trump’s chief of staff “maybe eight to 10 times” and briefed several members of Congress on the eve of the Jan. 6 riot.
Phil Waldron, the retired colonel, was working with Trump’s outside lawyers and was part of a team that briefed the lawmakers on a PowerPoint presentation detailing “Options for 6 JAN,” Waldron told The Washington Post. He said his contribution to the presentation focused on his claims of foreign interference in the vote, as did his discussions with the White House.
A version of the presentation made its way to the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, on Jan. 5. That information surfaced publicly this past week after the congressional committee investigating the insurrection released a letter that said Meadows had turned the document over to the committee.
He doesn't have to be brought back to active duty. See this thread: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...anuary-6-insurrection.467653/#post-1075094147He should be brought back to active duty and court-martialed.
Awesome!! That should be done. He was involved in a plot to overturn an election through fraud and violence. Sure seems treasonous.He doesn't have to be brought back to active duty. See this thread: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...anuary-6-insurrection.467653/#post-1075094147
It contains discussion about the military prosecuting retired personnel in relation to this retired colonel.
I don't understand the problem. Isn't that the entire case of the democrats Trump Russia Collusion hoax? Foreign interference in the election! Why are the democrats not going after the foreign interference, like they did in 2016. Nope, this is a Trumped up Trump case again."...declaring a national security emergency and seizing paper ballots..."
Yeah, uhh, Houston, we have a problem
A retired U.S. Army colonel who circulated a proposal to challenge the 2020 election, including by declaring a national security emergency and seizing paper ballots, said that he visited the White House on multiple occasions after the election, spoke with President Donald Trump’s chief of staff “maybe eight to 10 times” and briefed several members of Congress on the eve of the Jan. 6 riot.
Phil Waldron, the retired colonel, was working with Trump’s outside lawyers and was part of a team that briefed the lawmakers on a PowerPoint presentation detailing “Options for 6 JAN,” Waldron told The Washington Post. He said his contribution to the presentation focused on his claims of foreign interference in the vote, as did his discussions with the White House.
A version of the presentation made its way to the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, on Jan. 5. That information surfaced publicly this past week after the congressional committee investigating the insurrection released a letter that said Meadows had turned the document over to the committee.
What ****ing fraud?It was a good plan. Perfectly legal.
If it had been implemented two weeks after the election, the fraud would have been uncovered and corrected.
Still stuck with your Big Lie, I see.What ****ing fraud?
Trump lost. His goons tried to overturn the election.
Go live in Russia if you want a dictatorship.
I don't understand the problem. Isn't that the entire case of the democrats Trump Russia Collusion hoax? Foreign interference in the election! Why are the democrats not going after the foreign interference, like they did in 2016. Nope, this is a Trumped up Trump case again.
It was a good plan. Perfectly legal.
If it had been implemented two weeks after the election, the fraud would have been uncovered and corrected.
Still stuck with your Big Lie, I see.
You have my sympathy.
And people don't understand why many on the left are seen as either too authoritarian or fascistic.He should be brought back to active duty and court-martialed.
I guess no one distributes the news where you live.There was no fraud.
What is it with you an making these utterly retarted post?
Foreign.....
Interference......
"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
I guess no one distributes the news where you live.
It was a good plan. Perfectly legal.
If it had been implemented two weeks after the election, the fraud would have been uncovered and corrected.
So a man being caught with more than a few hundred ballots in his car.. could not be proven?Oh I saw plenty of *claims* of fraud. Claims that, mysteriously, couldn't be proven in a single court of law.
So a man being caught with more than a few hundred ballots in his car.. could not be proven?
What is it with you an making these utterly retarted post?
Oh, so now you're reneging and adjusting the parameters to suit yourself...Uh huh. So how many fraudulent ballots were cast?
Apologies for forgetting the placement of D instead of T.Urban Dictionary: retarted
retarted: One who [has been] [given] [additional] tarts.www.urbandictionary.com
Oh, so now you're reneging and adjusting the parameters to suit yourself...
Yeah, I've already seen more than enough people squirm around on this issue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?