Editorials Address Conundrum of Halted Warming

[Jack Hays]

Yeah. Me and 97% of scientists. At least I'm in good company. Your company consists of Christopher Monckton...

. . . and Richard Lindzen and Henrik Svensmark and . . . etc., etc.eace

 

[Threegoofs]

Stop trolling people dude.. You obviously have nothing of value to add, so you are doing your usual nonsense.. Sorry, I won't feed you..

In other words, you can't come up with anything better than 'Nuh, uh!'.

Read something for once, wouldja?

 

[gslack]

In other words, you can't come up with anything better than 'Nuh, uh!'.

Read something for once, wouldja?

Come up with? For what your last trolling insult? No need... You're trolling to try and get people to troll you back, and then miraculously that person will get an infraction.. No thanks dude, I learned your game.. Try it with somebody else..

 

[Jack Hays]

In other words, you can't come up with anything better than 'Nuh, uh!'.

Read something for once, wouldja?

Here's some reading for you.

[h=2]IPCC Climate: A Product of Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics Built On Inadequate Data[/h] Posted on October 2, 2013 by Guest Blogger
Guest essay by Dr. Tim Ball

“If you torture the data enough, nature will always confess” – Ronald Coase.
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable. – Anonymous.
​

Climatology is the study of average weather over time or in a region. It is very different than Climate Science, which is the study by specialists of individual components of the complex system that is weather. Each part is usually studied independent of the entire system and even how it interacts or influences the larger system. A supposed link between the parts is the use of statistics. Climatology has suffered from a pronounced form of the average versus the discrete problem from the early 1980s when computer modelers began to dominate the science. Climatology was doomed to failure from then on, only accelerated by its hijacking for a political agenda. I witnessed a good example early at a conference in Edmonton on Prairie Climate predictions and the implications for agriculture.
Continue reading →eace

 

[Threegoofs]

Here's some reading for you.

[h=2]IPCC Climate: A Product of Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics Built On Inadequate Data[/h] Posted on October 2, 2013by Guest Blogger
Guest essay by Dr. Tim Ball

“If you torture the data enough, nature will always confess” – Ronald Coase.
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable. – Anonymous.
​

Climatology is the study of average weather over time or in a region. It is very different than Climate Science, which is the study by specialists of individual components of the complex system that is weather. Each part is usually studied independent of the entire system and even how it interacts or influences the larger system. A supposed link between the parts is the use of statistics. Climatology has suffered from a pronounced form of the average versus the discrete problem from the early 1980s when computer modelers began to dominate the science. Climatology was doomed to failure from then on, only accelerated by its hijacking for a political agenda. I witnessed a good example early at a conference in Edmonton on Prairie Climate predictions and the implications for agriculture.
Continue reading →eace

Instead of a blog, read what real scientists are saying.

www.ipcc.org

 

[Jack Hays]

Instead of a blog, read what real scientists are saying.

Investment Planning Counsel - Live the Dream

Really??? A link to Investment Planning Counsel?? Is that where "real scientists" plan their investments?? The combination of unearned condescension and blithering incompetence makes your post the worst of all time. Congratulations!:lamo:lol::rofl:laughat::2rofll:

 

[flogger]

Really??? A link to Investment Planning Counsel?? Is that where "real scientists" plan their investments?? The combination of unearned condescension and blithering incompetence makes your post the worst of all time. Congratulations!

I dont know that I'd agree with you there Jack he has had some other real even more worthy 'winners' in the past this is just another one of the ... many

 

[code1211]

What an amazing distortion!

It must be awful to live in your made-up world.

As opposed to living in your world where stating actual facts is recognized as "an amazing distortion".

You are truly well equipped to be a proponent of AGW Science.

 

[Jack Hays]

I dont know that I'd agree with you there Jack he has had some other real even more worthy 'winners' in the past this is just another one of the ... many

I defer to those who have known him longer.