• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Early US Voting Appears to Favor Democrats

Dogger807

Dogger807

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 24, 2005
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
238
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Election officials in several closely-contested states say Democrats are turning out to vote early in greater numbers than Republicans. With 34 states allowing voters to go to the polls in person before election day, experts estimate that up to 30 percent of U.S. voters are likely to cast their votes before November 4. VOA Correspondent Cindy Saine takes a look at what early voting trends might mean for the outcome of the election.
Click to expand...


Ok... it's really to early too call anything. However I think it's very significant to note the ratio of dem to rep turn out so far.
 
Wait till the numbers come in on Election Night! :mrgreen:
 
Dogger807 said:
Ok... it's really to early too call anything. However I think it's very significant to note the ratio of dem to rep turn out so far.
Click to expand...

So then your thread topic was just a Lie?

"Early US Voting Appears to Favor Democrats"

Why am I NOT surprised by this? :roll:
 
Truth Detector said:
So then your thread topic was just a Lie?

"Early US Voting Appears to Favor Democrats"

Why am I NOT surprised by this? :roll:
Click to expand...



American Enterprise Institute political analyst John Fortier says there is clearly a Democratic advantage in early voting, but he warns everyone not to jump to conclusions.
Click to expand...

UNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNG!
 
If Obama wins, I'll bet you won't hear any talk of voter fraud from the left.
 
American said:
If Obama wins, I'll bet you won't hear any talk of voter fraud from the left.
Click to expand...
You are abolutely correct.

And, if Obama loses, that's ALL you'll hear.
 
Truth Detector said:
Your thread title is "Early US Voting Appears to Favor Democrats"

Then you say "Ok... it's really to early too call anything."

So you must have made this up, which is a lie; why?
Click to expand...

Early voting favors does not mean it has been called, it means that it is favoring.
Nuances like this, or basic common sense perhaps, are certainly not some peoples strengths...

Why don't you do the brave thing and not attack people?
Why don't you do the brave thing and be positive about your stance instead of doing the cowardly thing of simply trying to tear the other guy down?

If you want, I could teach you how... :2razz:
 
Last edited:
Bodhisattva said:
Why don't you do the brave thing and not attack people?
Why don't you do the brave thing and be positive about your stance instead of doing the cowardly thing of simply trying to tear the other guy down?
Click to expand...



..............because it needed to be repeated.




Good Job, Bodi :2wave:
 
Bodhisattva said:
Early voting favors does not mean it has been called, it means that it is favoring.
Click to expand...

Thank you for admitting what the OP was lol. Never was the title Obama wins the presidency. The title was Early voting APPEARS to favor democrats lol.

Thank you though for admitting what the title was.
 
TheNextEra said:
Thank you for admitting what the OP was lol. Never was the title Obama wins the presidency. The title was Early voting APPEARS to favor democrats lol.

Thank you though for admitting what the title was.
Click to expand...


Yeah... I agree, "Early voting APPEARS to favor democrats", whatever that means...
I just don't think that this thread/title is something to wage war on...
Let alone base an entire argument/justification for victory on...
Pathetic.

Anyway... it appears that most sane people are seeing the light.

Bodi
 
Bodhisattva said:
Early voting favors does not mean it has been called, it means that it is favoring.
Nuances like this, or basic common sense perhaps, are certainly not some peoples strengths...

Why don't you do the brave thing and not attack people?
Why don't you do the brave thing and be positive about your stance instead of doing the cowardly thing of simply trying to tear the other guy down?

If you want, I could teach you how... :2razz:
Click to expand...

You are truly a caricature of your own denial; the only thing you have ever done on this forum is bait and attack.

The only thing you could possibly teach is ignorance; and trust me, there is plenty of that on the forum to go around, particularly from your side of the aisle.

The only thing more amusing about such ignorance is that bloated self opinion you have of yourself.

But hey, do keep avoiding substance or the thread topic; we wouldn't want you to actually have a point.

Originally Posted by Truth Detector
Your thread title is "Early US Voting Appears to Favor Democrats"

Then you say "Ok... it's really to early too call anything."

I would ask what part of the above do you NOT get; but it is readily apparent you seldom get anything or have a point. Now please stop your baiting and trolling before you get infracted again, and again, and again.
 
Truth Detector said:
You are truly a caricature of your own denial; the only thing you have ever done on this forum is bait and attack.

The only thing you could possibly teach is ignorance; and trust me, there is plenty of that on the forum to go around, particularly from your side of the aisle.

The only thing more amusing about such ignorance is that bloated self opinion you have of yourself.

But hey, do keep avoiding substance or the thread topic; we wouldn't want you to actually have a point.

Originally Posted by Truth Detector
Your thread title is "Early US Voting Appears to Favor Democrats"

Then you say "Ok... it's really to early too call anything."

I would ask what part of the above do you NOT get; but it is readily apparent you seldom get anything or have a point. Now please stop your baiting and trolling before you get infracted again, and again, and again.
Click to expand...

I was simply giving an opinion that most people share... sorry to have so obviously upset you.

Just playin'. OK then, lets look at this issue seriously for a second.
I will suspend, or call ;), my game of sarcasm due to maturity setting in.

Originally Posted by Bodhisattva
Early voting favors

does ... not ... mean

it has been called,

it means that it is favoring.
Click to expand...

fa·vor (fā'vər) Pronunciation Key
n.
A gracious, friendly, or obliging act that is freely granted: do someone a favor.

Friendly or favorable regard; approval or support: won the favor of the monarch; looked with favor on the plan.
A state of being held in such regard: a style currently in favor

favoring definition | Dictionary.com

What part about "favoring" bothers you. Seriously... what am I not seeing that you are?
It is obviously "A state of being held in such regard" which means that it is happening "CURRENTLY".
Favoring does not mean that it is concluded, hence it has not been "called".
It is still in the process of, thereby indicating that it can change in the future, just like a game that gets called.
This means that a decision has been made, and obviously the decision is not in until the election is over.
Again, indicating that it has not been "Called", or stopped.


call (kôl) Pronunciation Key
v. called, call·ing, calls

To stop or postpone (a game) because of bad weather, darkness, or other adverse conditions.

called definition | Dictionary.com



Let me know what you think.
 
WTF is the confusion here? Bod, it seemed to me your thread title was referring to the early voting while your "too early to call" comment was about the final outcome of the race. Yes? No?
 
ADK_Forever said:
WTF is the confusion here? Bod, it seemed to me your thread title was referring to the early voting while your "too early to call" comment was about the final outcome of the race. Yes? No?
Click to expand...

Yeah... early voting indications means that it is too early to call, right?
That means that it has not been called yet. That is my point.
It is a small one, but one that I am making and one that TD won't accept.

Unless that is... I am missing something? I am open... talk to me Goose! :2razz:
 
Bodhisattva said:
I was simply giving an opinion that most people share... sorry to have so obviously upset you.

Just playin'. OK then, lets look at this issue seriously for a second.
I will suspend, or call ;), my game of sarcasm due to maturity setting in.



fa·vor (fā'vər) Pronunciation Key
n.
A gracious, friendly, or obliging act that is freely granted: do someone a favor.

Friendly or favorable regard; approval or support: won the favor of the monarch; looked with favor on the plan.
A state of being held in such regard: a style currently in favor

favoring definition | Dictionary.com

What part about "favoring" bothers you. Seriously... what am I not seeing that you are?
It is obviously "A state of being held in such regard" which means that it is happening "CURRENTLY".
Favoring does not mean that it is concluded, hence it has not been "called".
It is still in the process of, thereby indicating that it can change in the future, just like a game that gets called.
This means that a decision has been made, and obviously the decision is not in until the election is over.
Again, indicating that it has not been "Called", or stopped.


call (kôl) Pronunciation Key
v. called, call·ing, calls

To stop or postpone (a game) because of bad weather, darkness, or other adverse conditions.

called definition | Dictionary.com



Let me know what you think.
Click to expand...

Here we go again... the third time that you challenge me, the third time I have tried to debate with you after you whine about you being able to whoop on me in a debate regarding your challenge, and now... the thrid time (officially) that you have punked out like a whiney snot nosed child. Dude, you are a joke. Beyond one actually... :rofl
 
It seems simple comprehension is not a requirement of "truth detection" for some.
 
Goobieman said:
I'll bet not.
Click to expand...

You are already hearing it from the right. They are calling for voter fraud when only registration fraud exists. Do you think this will just go away after Nov. 4 if Obama wins?
 
Gibberish said:
You are already hearing it from the right. They are calling for voter fraud when only registration fraud exists. Do you think this will just go away after Nov. 4 if Obama wins?
Click to expand...
Yep. There will be no appreciable word of it from the right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom