• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Drag queen who danced for kids charged with 25 counts of child pornography

This is just sick, sick!
Yes, it is. "questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news."

  • We rate LifeSiteNews far-right biased for story selection that always favors evangelical Christianity and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and many failed fact checks.
 
"In 2019, the Houston Public Library admitted that a registered child sex offender had been reading to children as part of their Drag Queen Storytime program. In 2020, UK Drag Queen Storytime tweeted out the pedophile slogan “Love has no age.” In 2021, a sponsor of Drag Queen Storytime in Milwaukee was arrested on child pornography charges. And this year, a Pennsylvania drag queen named Brice Patric Ryschon Williams, who has danced explicitly for children, was charged with 25 counts of child pornography in Pennsylvania. Williams identifies as a “genderqueer social worker” and is a well-known LGBT activist....

The response of the media and the LGBT movement is to... ignore stories like the one that just broke in Pennsylvania. Oh, and gaslight parents."

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/.../?utm_source=home_blogs&utm_campaign=catholic

Well, well, well....

Looks like the so-called "conspiracy theorists" were correct again.

We now have direct confirmation that literal pedophiles are involved in the drag queen library story time events, grooming children!

Makes me wonder how many LGBT teachers and activists who work with kids in other areas and events are also pedophiles bent on grooming kids to exploit, and why isn't the LGBT movement condemning and purging pedophiles from it's ranks?

This is just sick, sick!
So is your point that we shouldn’t have drag queens read to kids, or that we shouldn’t have pedophiles read to kids, or that we shouldn’t have drag queens who are pedophiles read to kids or that we shouldn’t have LGBT people teach or read to kids, or that we shouldn’t have straight pedophiles teach or read to kids?
 
So is your point that we shouldn’t have drag queens read to kids, or that we shouldn’t have pedophiles read to kids, or that we shouldn’t have drag queens who are pedophiles read to kids or that we shouldn’t have LGBT people teach or read to kids, or that we shouldn’t have straight pedophiles teach or read to kids?
Drag queens reading to kids is odd. I remember asking Somebody why and they couldn't explain. So the only explanation is they want to feel woke or sophisticated.
 
Drag queens reading to kids is odd. I remember asking Somebody why and they couldn't explain. So the only explanation is they want to feel woke or sophisticated.
It would be okay if the reading program were something like magical dress up time, and included heterosexual people in costume also, but just drag queens reading to kids is definitely creepy, and is definitely grooming.
 
It would be okay if the reading program were something like magical dress up time, and included heterosexual people in costume also, but just drag queens reading to kids is definitely creepy, and is definitely grooming.
It's like if cabaret girls were reading to kids and their costumes it doesn't make sense.
 
It's like if cabaret girls were reading to kids and their costumes it doesn't make sense.
It would be better if they just had people read to kids in non-sexualized costume.
 
It would be better if they just had people read to kids in non-sexualized costume.
Yeah it is a bit strange this bad fellow they've created it makes me wonder why.

I'm going to err on the side of they want to appear woke versus anything more nefarious
 
Yeah it is a bit strange this bad fellow they've created it makes me wonder why.

I'm going to err on the side of they want to appear woke versus anything more nefarious
That could be true, but I lean towards the more nefarious, though I don't believe that most drag queens are actually trying to be nefarious themselves.
 
It would be better if they just had people read to kids in non-sexualized costume.

You realise they don't wear the same costume to a kid's story time that they wear at an adult drag show at a nightclub. You know, how like an actor can star in a horror film and also a kid's film.
 
Hey, can you do me a favor? All I need is a screed about illegal immigration and a passionate argument why you should have gone to prison for smoking pot as a kid, and I'll be able to finish my right-wing conservative bingo card.

It's worth $50, and since you're the one doing all the hard work, it's only fair I should give you at least a quarter.
/Thread win 😂
 
Yes, it is. "questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news."

  • We rate LifeSiteNews far-right biased for story selection that always favors evangelical Christianity and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and many failed fact checks.
Here:

The original article even quoted ThePostMillenial as its source, so you apparently didn't bother to read very deeply:

 
So is your point that we shouldn’t have drag queens read to kids, or that we shouldn’t have pedophiles read to kids, or that we shouldn’t have drag queens who are pedophiles read to kids or that we shouldn’t have LGBT people teach or read to kids, or that we shouldn’t have straight pedophiles teach or read to kids?
OH NO! That would be DISCRIMINATION, and the Demarcates are working hard to eradicate all DISCRIMINATION --- unless it is Christians who are being discriminated against --- they invented another term for that kind of DISCRIMINATION!
 
OH NO! That would be DISCRIMINATION, and the Demarcates are working hard to eradicate all DISCRIMINATION --- unless it is Christians who are being discriminated against --- they invented another term for that kind of DISCRIMINATION!
Christians, who are more than 60% of the population, have not been discriminated against by a minority. The fact that other people of various religions or otherwise have equal religious and secular rights is not discretion against Christians

BTW, Are you as equally outraged when ministers and priests, who are later convicted of sexual abuse of adults or minors read the bible to kids or is that different when that happens?
 
OH NO! That would be DISCRIMINATION, and the Demarcates are working hard to eradicate all DISCRIMINATION --- unless it is Christians who are being discriminated against --- they invented another term for that kind of DISCRIMINATION!
Your comment makes no sense. Who are the Demarcates? Are you speaking of Decartes? For your information, discrimination against Christians is just as illegal as against other religions.

But I am fine with having drag queens read to kids, but ok with prohibiting those “on the registry” as sex offenders told thanks but no thanks. Neither Decartes nor democrats have a problem with that.

I think, therefore I am.
 
Your comment makes no sense. Who are the Demarcates? Are you speaking of Decartes? For your information, discrimination against Christians is just as illegal as against other religions.

But I am fine with having drag queens read to kids, but ok with prohibiting those “on the registry” as sex offenders told thanks but no thanks. Neither Decartes nor democrats have a problem with that.

I think, therefore I am.
The problem is that, as in the case with sex offenders, drag queens are setting an example for impressionable children. They are illustrating that such behavior is fine. And if the drag queen is off work and just dressed gender appropriately and speaking naturally --- the children will not know, the fact is that once a sex offender has paid his/her time, and they dress appropriately and limit their vocabulary --- the children will not know.
 
The problem is that, as in the case with sex offenders, drag queens are setting an example for impressionable children. They are illustrating that such behavior is fine. And if the drag queen is off work and just dressed gender appropriately and speaking naturally --- the children will not know, the fact is that once a sex offender has paid his/her time, and they dress appropriately and limit their vocabulary --- the children will not know.
Are you suggesting, if I get your point (forgive if I missed) that a drag queen is the same as an offender, that a guy putting on a dress is the same as one molesting kids?

My kid lived in the SF Bay Area with me and my wife. If he had a drag queen teaching him it wouldn't be any more offensive than me watching Milton Berle or Flip Wilson or MASH's Clinger or the Church Lady in drag elsewhere.
 
Your comment makes no sense. Who are the Demarcates? Are you speaking of Decartes? For your information, discrimination against Christians is just as illegal as against other religions.

But I am fine with having drag queens read to kids, but ok with prohibiting those “on the registry” as sex offenders told thanks but no thanks. Neither Decartes nor democrats have a problem with that.

I think, therefore I am.

Are you suggesting, if I get your point (forgive if I missed) that a drag queen is the same as an offender, that a guy putting on a dress is the same as one molesting kids?

My kid lived in the SF Bay Area with me and my wife. If he had a drag queen teaching him it wouldn't be any more offensive than me watching Milton Berle or Flip Wilson or MASH's Clinger or the Church Lady in drag elsewhere.

Remember, these righties NEVER clear out the creeps within their own ranks. For instance:

 
Back
Top Bottom