• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dr. Ford's friend was also at the party, but says Kavanaugh was not there

M

marke

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2018
Messages
34,752
Reaction score
3,961
Location
north carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Leland Keyser was named by Ford as one of three witnesses at the party and Keyser says he believes Ford's account, with the exception of the Kavanaugh part. He says Kavanaugh was not there.

Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth also say they do not remember Kavanaugh being at a party and doing what Ford now claims.

Democrats may need some partisan democrat dream team like Fusion GPS to come up with 'evidence' before MS. Ford ends up going down in flames.
 
The Democrat narrative is imploding on its, um, face.

 
marke said:
Leland Keyser was named by Ford as one of three witnesses at the party and Keyser says he believes Ford's account, with the exception of the Kavanaugh part. He says Kavanaugh was not there.

Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth also say they do not remember Kavanaugh being at a party and doing what Ford now claims.

Democrats may need some partisan democrat dream team like Fusion GPS to come up with 'evidence' before MS. Ford ends up going down in flames.
Click to expand...

That must not have been the party which she is (not?) so vividly remembering - you know, the one where the attempted rape by Kavanaugh happened and where Judge was drunk and they tumbled off of the bed.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
That must not have been the party which she is (not?) so vividly remembering - you know, the one where the attempted rape by Kavanaugh happened and where Judge was drunk and they tumbled off of the bed.
Click to expand...

It is hard to say. Dr. Ford is the one who named the three others as being at the party, but the other three don't remember it at all. That does not make her a strong case. Perhaps she is mixing up memories and making mistakes. Kavanaugh and his family should not have their lives ruined because one woman makes mistakes about one event she cannot accurately remember.
 
marke said:
It is hard to say. Dr. Ford is the one who named the three others as being at the party, but the other three don't remember it at all. That does not make her a strong case. Perhaps she is mixing up memories and making mistakes. Kavanaugh and his family should not have their lives ruined because one woman makes mistakes about one event she cannot accurately remember.
Click to expand...

Don't worry about it only being one woman (or even only women) now that Grassley has opened the barn door wide open for those making allegations (as to Kavanaugh's less than perfect character) to have their legal council set 'rules' such that they cannot be charged with perjury, libel or slander there will, no doubt, be many more 'credible allegations' coming soon.
 
This is a ****ing train wreck.

You know...for all the allegations...there should be at least ONE PERSON that does not have a history of activism against the current administration, that wasnt drunk off their ass, and that presents a complaint against Kavenaugh that isnt completely contradicted by at least half the people supposedly involved.

And if the idiot ****ing leftists had not spent the last 6 months vowing to do ANYTHING to stop this nomination, the allegations might not be met with so much skepticism...assuming again that they were presented by someone that does not have a history of activism against the current administration, that wasnt drunk off their ass, and that presents a complaint against Kavenaugh that isnt completely contradicted by at least half the people supposedly involved.

At this point, rump should probably announce tomorrow his support of Kavenaugh but the withdrawal of his nomination and nominate Amy Barrett. And the GOP should ram the nomination through in 30 days.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Don't worry about it only being one woman (or even only women) now that Grassley has opened the barn door wide open for those making allegations (as to Kavanaugh's less than perfect character) to have their legal council set 'rules' such that they cannot be charged with perjury, libel or slander there will, no doubt, be many more 'credible allegations' coming soon.
Click to expand...

Democrats have proven their willingness to pay big money to hire liars to attack any good candidate for SCOTUS. These wicked Borking savages are a serious threat to the future and stability of the US and need to be stopped in their lying deceitful barbarian tracks.
 
I find it odd that Ford is believed, even without any evidence or witnesses but everyone else is lying.


Sent from my iPad Pro using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom