• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DP Congress now in session. A new Healthcare Law?

Stewart

Cammunist
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
986
Reaction score
271
Location
Australia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
With so much distaste being expressed for the PPACA (Obamacare,) I challenge the enlightened and interested members of DP to come together and debate in fair terms the next steps for Healthcare Reform.
Obamacare has been repealed in it's entirety, it's gone. Completely obliterated. It is up to you to determine what features we implement in this law. Can we produce a bi-partisan solution to the healthcare problem or are such attempts doomed?

All proposals should attempt to address two issues:

Cost Healthcare services in America are really expensive. Really Expensive. Currently it outspends (in reference to GDP) all other OECD countries by a large margin... If the growth in healthcare spending seen in the last decade continues into 2020, it will have grave consequences.

Access While all other OECD countries have guaranteed access to Healthcare, there remains large gaps in coverage and approximately 1/6 Americans is without Health insurance.

Challenges:

Medicaid and Medicare aren't secure in the long run and large unfunded deficits are expected over the next two decades.

Due to inelastic demand and a restricted supply, you cannot expect market solutions to work. Healthcare, at least essential healthcare services if fundamentally different from even other necessities of life such as food and shelter. These can be obtained cheaply, healthcare services cannot.

To produce a high performance healthcare system it is important to get the private/public mix correct. While liberals argue that Government should play the dominant role in healthcare provision. Conservatives believe emphatically that it's only role should be regulation. How do you bridge this ideological gap. Government is better at getting people into coverage, while private enterprising can provide higher quality care, government is far better at getting people into coverage. Getting the mix correct is essential, too little government and waiting lines increase, too much private and cost accelerates and inequality is created.

To help you out I'll start:

I propose a two tiered implementation. Rather than changing everything at one point, introducing things over time would be a much better idea. For instance:

2016
Some PPACA provisions (children on parental insurance, removal of annual and lifetime caps, pre-existing conditions mandatory coverage, community rating)

Establishment of a framework for interstate selling of Insurance (work with state to reduce barriers)

Insurance providers have the option of enforcing waiting periods of up to two years for people who are out of coverage for greater than one month, must have at least 10 months of insurance in the preceding 12 months (this will prevent 'gaming' the system)

For those who are unemployed, the government will cover 70% of the premium under cobra (3 months only.) To be funded by removing the home interest tax deduction.

Price transparency, a provider will be required to provide the patient with an estimated cost of all procedures. Providers should charge both insurance company and patients the same price regardless of means of payment.

Expansion of Medicaid to end inequality amongst poor groups and subsidization of health premiums for poor people, no idea how I will fund this one.

IPAB to remain, however increase it's numbers to include Drs and other healthcare professionals to work together with economists and health policy experts.

Establish a medical board staffed with Drs and other medical professionals with the objective of creating national standards for medical care that would include recommended treatments. This would help to reduce the overuse of medical resources as detailed in the Dartmouth Health atlas.

Repeal EMTALA - It's more socialized than anything in Australia!

Health Insurance reform, maximum time to play claims of 31 days. Streamline payment process through IT, various reforms.


2020-25?
Repeal medicare, medicaid replace with a proper NHI ( Single-payer) program.


Do I do enough to control, constrain costs, probably not. But the problem that is the cost to us represents income to to other people. The Cost problem is ingrained into the healthcare system.
 
I'd like to see a single payer system that covers everyone in the country in case of catastrophic injury or illness. It would be a simple system with a fairly high deductible and high out-of-pocket maximum. Say maybe a $5000 deductible and a $10,000 out of pocket maximum with 80% coinsurance for a family, and half that for a single person. That would deal with the problem of people going bankrupt if they're in a bad car accident, or come down with cancer or have a heart attack. It's not going to deal with everyone's day to day health problems though. So I'd also like to see everyone in the country allowed to open an HSA and save money in it tax-free as long as it's used for health care costs. People with low income could get a stipend from the government in their HSAs to help cover the gap and pay for their day-to-day healthcare so that they aren't letting things get really bad and going to the emergency room because they can't afford to see a doctor. There would probably also be the option to get some private insurance coverage to help close the gap if you wanted to as well.

The other thing is you would have to look at somehow cutting back on lawsuits. Part of the reason healthcare is so expensive is because doctors order a lot of tests to cover their own asses so they don't get sued for malpractice. And because they have to carry a lot of expensive malpractice insurance.
 
tort reform

heavy taxes on processed sugar and trans fat

remove the health insurance exemption from antitrust laws
 
The ACA is here to stay. Employers must pay 60% of all HC costs!

Onlything better is single payer.

Everyone on the same plan
military
old
kids
poor
rich
For LIFE.
Employers TOTALLY removed from HC.

all at a cost of about 33% of Medicare alone.

How you ask? Ask EVERY OTHER WESTERN NATION...........
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…