In real life if a group of black people target someone for being white, call them racial expletives and then mug them or assault them, its a hate crime.
In real life, if a group of white people go out and burn down a mosque its terrorism.
The whole hate crime/ terrorism definition cluster **** is wrong.
Also, if you are able to attack muslims on religion, then jews are also subject to criticism.
Also, theres no argument on earth that will persuade me that black pride is right but white pride is wrong.
That is all.
We are living in a world of stupid double think and we need to grow the **** up and see that we are all people under the law and a black president who is really mixed race.
There is no double standard. That is just another race bait arguement.
Go to the law library, and find the books that deal with black crime vs white crime.Of course theres double standards. I just explained a few.
Show me how they arent double standards.
Go to the law library, and find the books that deal with black crime vs white crime.
1999? Cant find something from this century?Ive cited my evidence. Wheres yours? Go to the library doesnt cut it.
Analysis of the 1999 FBI statistics by John Perazzo in 2001 found that white violence against black people was 28 times more likely (1 in 45 incidents) to be labelled as a hate crime than black violence against white people (1 in 1254 incidents).
1999? Cant find something from this century?
And you a 15 year old study.So what? Youve provided nothing but rhetoric.
Do you think they're both right or both wrong?Also, theres no argument on earth that will persuade me that black pride is right but white pride is wrong.
Do you think they're both right or both wrong?
But if the art is racialist then obviously it might get censored by the mainstream.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?