• Please keep all posts on the Rittenhouse verdict here: Rittenhouse Verdict. Note the moderator warnings in the thread. The thread will be heavily moderated with a zero tolerance policy for any baiting, flaming, trolling or other rule breaks. Stick to the topic and not the other posters. Thank you.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donald Trump and Kids Named in $250M Tax Scam

Glen Contrarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,688
Reaction score
8,046
Location
Bernie to the left of me, Hillary to the right, he
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
From The Daily Beast:

The lawsuit, unsealed Thursday, describes the scheme as simple, telling the judge ‘there need be no fear of complexity, for there is none.’

Four Donald Trump-licensed real-estate developments are at the center of a huge income tax evasion scheme, according to allegations in a lawsuit unsealed Thursday afternoon by a judge in Manhattan.

The presumptive Republican nominee is not personally accused. He is described as a “material witness” in the evasion of taxes on as much as $250 million in income. According to the court papers, that includes $100 million in profits and $65 million in real-estate transfer taxes from a Manhattan high rise project bearing his familiar name.

However, his status may change, according to the lawyers who filed the lawsuit, Richard Lerner and Frederick M. Oberlander, citing Trump’s testimony about Felix Sater, a convicted stock swindler at the center of the alleged scheme.

Trump received tens of millions of dollars in fees and partnership interests in one of the four projects, the Trump Soho New York, a luxury high rise in lower Manhattan. His son Donald Junior and his daughter Ivanka also were paid in fees and partnership interests, the lawyers said, and are also material witnesses in the case.
Trump and Sater traveled extensively together and were photographed and interviewed in Denver and Loveland, Colorado, Phoenix, Fort Lauderdale, and New York. The two Trump children were also with Sater in Moscow, Alan Garten, the Trump Organization general counsel, has said.

Trump has testified about Sater in a Florida lawsuit accusing the two of them of fraud in a failed high-rise project. Trump testified that he had a glancing knowledge of Sater and would not recognize him if he were sitting in the room.

Sater controlled an investment firm named Bayrock, with offices in Trump Tower, and sought to develop branded Trump Tower luxury buildings in Moscow and other cities. Court papers show his salary in 2006 was $7 million, but it alleges that was a pittance compared to his real income.

Sater then moved into the Trump Organization offices. He carried a business card, issued by the Trump Organization, identifying him as a “senior adviser” to Trump.

The tax fraud lawsuit included 212 pages of documents, among them a flow chart that the plantiff claims showed how the scheme worked. The lawsuit alleges the tax fraud scheme as simple, telling the judge “there need be no fear of complexity, for there is none.”

48951123.cached.jpg

The four developments were all handled as partnerships. Partnerships are not taxed and are rarely audited because the profits are supposed to be reported as going to the partners personally. The lawsuit says the profits simply were not reported when Sater and others took their partnership profits and other income from the deals.

The state tax fraud lawsuit is known as a qui tam case in which citizens file as private attorneys general on behalf of the government. In effect Lerner and Oberlander are acting as prosecutors in the alleged tax fraud.
Eric Schneiderman, the New York State attorney general, learned of the case soon after it was filed in state court last August and declined to intervene. His office confirmed that stance Thursday after the lawsuit was unsealed.

The suit says Sater and other defendants owe at least $7 million in New York state income taxes, a sum that would be tripled if they prevail.

If the federal government were to intervene the federal taxes would come to about $35 million.
 

Captain Adverse

Classical Liberal Sage
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
16,652
Reaction score
21,955
Location
Mid-West USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
The lawsuit, unsealed Thursday, describes the scheme as simple, telling the judge ‘there need be no fear of complexity, for there is none.’

Four Donald Trump-licensed real-estate developments are at the center of a huge income tax evasion scheme, according to allegations in a lawsuit unsealed Thursday afternoon by a judge in Manhattan.

The presumptive Republican nominee is not personally accused. He is described as a “material witness” in the evasion of taxes on as much as $250 million in income.

Point of Information: To be "Named" in a lawsuit does not mean to be mentioned. It means to be identified in the pleading as a party being sued.

The bolded is all we need to know until such time as that status changes. :coffeepap:
 
Last edited:

Glen Contrarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,688
Reaction score
8,046
Location
Bernie to the left of me, Hillary to the right, he
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Point of Information: To be "Named" in a lawsuit does not mean to be mentioned. It means to be identified in the pleading as a party being sued.

The bolded is all we need to know until such time as that status changes. :coffeepap:

I didn't say they were accused, did I? All I did was copy-and-paste per the directions for posting in that section.

That said, it would be nice if Trump had the intestinal fortitude to open up his tax returns as have all other modern-day major presidential candidates.
 

Chomsky

Social Democrat
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
58,834
Reaction score
45,670
Location
Third Coast
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
From The Daily Beast:

The lawsuit, unsealed Thursday, describes the scheme as simple, telling the judge ‘there need be no fear of complexity, for there is none.’

Four Donald Trump-licensed real-estate developments are at the center of a huge income tax evasion scheme, according to allegations in a lawsuit unsealed Thursday afternoon by a judge in Manhattan.

The presumptive Republican nominee is not personally accused. He is described as a “material witness” in the evasion of taxes on as much as $250 million in income.

<snip>
I think the Daily Beast's headline here is a bit deceiving.

Yes the Trump's are named, but as material witnesses - not defendants!
 

CanadaJohn

Canadian Conservative
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
28,764
Reaction score
20,448
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
I can't wait until Whitewater and Susan McDougall and Vince Foster start popping up in the media once again.

As I've said previously - in a nation of about 330 million people, are these two the best you've got??
 

ajn678

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Messages
8,002
Reaction score
3,420
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I think the Daily Beast's headline here is a bit deceiving.

Yes the Trump's are named, but as material witnesses - not defendants!

But then the lawsuit wouldn't be news worthy and The Daily Beast wouldn't get clicks on it!
 

Captain Adverse

Classical Liberal Sage
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
16,652
Reaction score
21,955
Location
Mid-West USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Let's not play coy here.

The purpose for posting this article is to try to sling more "corruption" mud at Trump.

The idea is to show he is every bit as corrupt as Hillary, and that with that in mind we can overlook her hackery in the up-coming election.

One difference though...any alleged Trump personal corruption appears to lie in the business arena, not the political arena.

When dealing with business, one should always keep in mind the caveat "Let the buyer beware."

When dealing with public trust? There is a greater duty of care for those who hold public office not to break that trust for personal gain.

Hillary has been a player in the political arena since her husband first ran for office. Her history of public sector corruption starts with the Whitewater scandal and moves on from there to allegations of "pay-for-play" influence peddling during periods when both she and her husband held office.
 
Last edited:

coldjoint

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
14,235
Reaction score
1,453
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I didn't say they were accused, did I? All I did was copy-and-paste per the directions for posting in that section.

That said, it would be nice if Trump had the intestinal fortitude to open up his tax returns as have all other modern-day major presidential candidates.

Most presidents have their school records for everyone to see, not sealed. I guess no one is perfect.
 

Captain Adverse

Classical Liberal Sage
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
16,652
Reaction score
21,955
Location
Mid-West USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Anyone who thinks they have a right to see the tax returns of any other American citizen...please feel free to step up to the plate first and publish your entire history of tax returns online for all to see.

Otherwise? IMO it is not relevant to anything other than personal nosiness in hopes of finding personal faults they can then decry, based in a belief of a "right to know!"
 

Quazimodo

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 24, 2016
Messages
2,417
Reaction score
688
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Anyone who thinks they have a right to see the tax returns of any other American citizen...please feel free to step up to the plate first and publish your entire history of tax returns online for all to see.

Otherwise? IMO it is not relevant to anything other than personal nosiness in hopes of finding personal faults they can then decry, based in a belief of a "right to know!"

The innuendo needs to be stuffed in-their-endo.
 
Top Bottom