- Joined
- Mar 29, 2016
- Messages
- 40,927
- Reaction score
- 55,002
- Location
- Houston Area, TX
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
...HOW??? How do you have a turnover rate higher than the number of people you originally employed???
Magic?
...HOW??? How do you have a turnover rate higher than the number of people you originally employed???
Why the hell would you stay at a company that didn't value you, or abused you or allowed others to abuse you? I think Trump makes sense in this case.
Wouldn't it make more sense to fight the "hostile workplace" battle after you already have a new job lined up?
The comment assumes there are plentiful opportunities to which one could turn, but that is a false assumption, especially in the struggling US market.
The reason human rights commissions get involved is to prevent the victim of sexual harassment from being punished for being a woman around a horny boss.
It shows again how limited is Trump's thinking, self oriented assuming everyone has the opportunities that his daughter has. He's not only a crude bigot but shallow and self centered; "I've got mine, **** everyone else."
The comment assumes there are plentiful opportunities to which one could turn, but that is a false assumption, especially in the struggling US market.
To be fair, when he's solely referring to his daughter, he has every right in the world to base the scenario solely on his daughter.
Ahhh...
No.
If he were a private citizen I would agree with you. However he is the leader of the GOP running for the Oval Office. With that it becomes a completely different situation, where he needs clarify what would be his stand if he were in charge of the country.
At the very least, in the absence of any clear, comprehensive policy on anything, one can only assume his original intent was that all women should do that.
And finally, his treatment of his previous wives more or less certifies that.
That's the bad side of the "no policy" populists. In Trump's case he merely gets a lackie to "explain" what he said or creates a diversion with another even stupider pronouncement.
...HOW??? How do you have a turnover rate higher than the number of people you originally employed???
You should try offering this advice to the millions of women and men who have been sexually harassed on the job, and see how well it goes over. :roll:
Magic?
Yeah. If I was being harrassed, I'd be like "**** it, I'm out!"
I think you're putting more into his comment than what is there. From what I can tell he didn't speak towards the matter of her fighting it or not.
"I would like to think she would find another career or find another company if that was the case," the GOP presidential nominee told USA Today.
You would let the the abuser get away with it? It's against the law.
If you were in a profession, why would you give up what you've worked for because some pig harassed you? It's wrong and the pig would deserve to lose his job. And unless the HR department does nothing about it or upper management, I wouldn't assume "they" thought it acceptable. I'd fight for my position.
To be fair, when he's solely referring to his daughter, he has every right in the world to base the scenario solely on his daughter.
You would let the the abuser get away with it? It's against the law.
If you were in a profession, why would you give up what you've worked for because some pig harassed you? It's wrong and the pig would deserve to lose his job. And unless the HR department does nothing about it or upper management, I wouldn't assume "they" thought it acceptable. I'd fight for my position.
Weird, sensible people are coming to Trump's support on this. It's almost like he's said something reasonable for once.
Stopped clocks are still right twice a day.
Although, I'm conflicted. Like, on one hand, as a general truism, leaving behind people who disrespect and abuse you = good. And on the other, if women just "take it on the chin" and leave as if it were just a personality conflict, rather than reporting it, it doesn't ever really change. That asshole just harasses the next women they hire, ya know?
Who has greater resources and therefore greater ability to just leave a job than the average woman.
Well look, I'm saying this because of my situation.
I have a minimum wage job, so it's not like I can't just go out and find another one easily.
But if it was a high-paying job, then I probably would fight for my position.
What does that have to do with anything? Do you have self respect? Do you think you have to deal with twits that wont lift a figure to protect their employees, that treat you like a widget to throw out? Getting another job while you are employed is a lot easier than when you are unemployed. I know, been there done that. Employers seem to think they are poaching you if you are employed. Use your time and effort you would to fight morons, to find a better job.
They can sue after they quit.
It has everything to do with it. Look at my reply to TheGoverness. The risk of getting fired or worse, harassed more for blowing the whistle. You also don't know that the company won't lift a finger so speaking up rather than slinking off like you did something wrong is stupid. A person has to weigh those consequences.
Ivanka has no such worries about finding another job.
I was in a crapy workplace. I started my own business on a shoe string because I hated who I worked for. Halliburton. The best thing I ever did. I got into the Logistics industry before that because I walked out on another crapy boss. I highly recommend it. The best way to do it while you are still employed. But if its bad enough don't hesitate to walk. I would give the same advise to anyone who asked. I offer the advise right now to anyone reading. Vote with your feet. Respect yourself more. Don't put up with crap. You don't have to.
You should try offering this advice to the millions of women and men who have been sexually harassed on the job, and see how well it goes over. :roll:
The OP specifically concerns sexual harassment in the workplace. That is a lawsuit-worthy offense, and I support any targeted woman or man's right to file such a suit. Do you?