python416
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2005
- Messages
- 484
- Reaction score
- 2
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
oldreliable67 said:aps & python,
Here is a really simple question for y'all: if the Dems disagree with the administration's understanding of what the AUMF authorizes, why don't they present clarifying legislation telling the administration that its interpretation is incorrect? This would enable the Senate to vote on whether it thinks listening to calls from al Qaeda to the US is a necessary and proper measure to prevent another attack.
No, it doesn't. Your statement is explicit proof that you are not sufficiently familiar with the issues. Please catch up by reading some of the other threads noted above, then try again.
There was no discussion of domestic spying in the drafting of the AUMF - according to people on the Senate committees (and no, I'm gonna dig up a reference cause I don't have time).
Are you trying to suggest that the AUMF from a week after 9/11 gives authorization to circumvent FISA for the rest of this war with no end?
Last edited: