python416
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2005
- Messages
- 484
- Reaction score
- 2
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
And if the NPT doesn't matter anymore, who sets the standards for civil and military nuclear programmes?
Inking a deal with non-NPT signatory India legitimizes its nuclear programme that operates outside international guidelines. Condemning Iran at the same time makes the water pretty murky.
This deal is a direct result of India backing away from Iran under pressure from the US. I don't want Iran to have the bomb either, but this only encourages an "every country for itself" global view of nuclear standards.
This should be an interesting debate in congress.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4766608.stm
Inking a deal with non-NPT signatory India legitimizes its nuclear programme that operates outside international guidelines. Condemning Iran at the same time makes the water pretty murky.
This deal is a direct result of India backing away from Iran under pressure from the US. I don't want Iran to have the bomb either, but this only encourages an "every country for itself" global view of nuclear standards.
This should be an interesting debate in congress.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4766608.stm
Last edited: