• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does ESP exist?

Pin dÁr

Pin dÁr

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
3,185
Reaction score
112
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Does ESP, like telepathy, clairvoyance, psychokineses etc really exist?

If not, why not?
 
No. There is no scientific evidence ESP exists, and by its nature, if it did exists it would be easy to study. So um, no.
Pin dÁr said:
Does ESP, like telepathy, clairvoyance, psychokineses etc really exist?

If not, why not?
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
No. There is no scientific evidence ESP exists, and by its nature, if it did exists it would be easy to study. So um, no.
Click to expand...

Well, How do you know there is no evidence? Have you studied all books then? Just how do you know?
Or is it just your default position? That would be interesting.

And how the hell would you know it would be easy to study? It is not here according to you, so you don't know anything about it,
How the hell then do you know it is easy?? This is very very illogical.
 
Pin dÁr said:
Does ESP, like telepathy, clairvoyance, psychokineses etc really exist?

If not, why not?
Click to expand...
absolutely

A7M2rWU.gif
 
FreedomFromAll said:
No. There is nothing in the human body that would support ESP. So no ESP in humans sorry.
Click to expand...

Ok, well explain more. How do you know that? what is needed then exactly in the body for this and why isn't it there?

And does in have to be in the body?

You are aware of Sheldrake's work? and his questions about our very very dogmatic (and extremely stupid) science?
 
Last edited:
Pin dÁr said:
he is a liar. let's leave it at that.
Click to expand...

He is awesome. I shall not leave it at that, because he disproves the whole point you're trying to make here.
 
Your Star said:
He is awesome. I shall not leave it at that, because he disproves the whole point you're trying to make here.
Click to expand...

Really? Are you sure?

please don't say this narcissist is your hero,ok? pleassse??? Besides Randi being very very ugly! Brrrrrr
 
Talking about it exists.

:lol:
 
shrubnose said:
Talking about it exists.

:lol:
Click to expand...

I think it is for real.

Take remote viewing. Done by Stanford Research Institute for years.

Ever heard of Rusell Targ & Ingo Swann ?They Worked there for years with very good results.

So, that is one piece of evidence.


There is a lot more.
 
Pin dÁr said:
Really? Are you sure?

please don't say this narcissist is your hero,ok? pleassse??? Besides Randi being very very ugly! Brrrrrr
Click to expand...

Let me guess, you really like Uri Geller?
 
Your Star said:
Let me guess, you really like Uri Geller?
Click to expand...

Nope, I am very ugly too. But I don't put my ugly head out there.

Come on now. Isn't he very ugly?

Oh that is another thread. ;)




The nonsens of Randi it should be called, lol what an idiot!
 
Pin dÁr said:
I think it is for real.
Click to expand...
Take remote viewing. Done by Stanford Research Institute for years.

Ever heard of Rusell Targ & Ingo Swann ?They Worked there for years with very good results.

So, that is one piece of evidence.


There is a lot more.
Click to expand...



Anyone who actually had it could put the lotteries out of business and that hasn't happened yet.

Think about that a little bit.
 
Pin dÁr said:
Ok, well explain more. How do you know that? what is needed then exactly in the body for this and why isn't it there?

And does in have to be in the body?

You are aware of Sheldrake's work? and his questions about our very very dogmatic (and extremely stupid) science?
Click to expand...
You clearly believe there is a definitive positive answer. Why not stop asking all these passive-aggressive open questions and present your hypothesis?

I for one would be truly interested to hear about a definitive mechanism identified to explain any of the various alleged phenomena in this area.
 
HonestJoe said:
You clearly believe there is a definitive positive answer. Why not stop asking all these passive-aggressive open questions and present your hypothesis?

I for one would be truly interested to hear about a definitive mechanism identified to explain any of the various alleged phenomena in this area.
Click to expand...
passive agressive? lol

I feel good, just stop projecting your non sense.


I ams asking these questions because I am really curious why people think that way.

I think rejecting it by reflex action is a sign of a closed mind.

As if we already have all the answers. Kind of arrogant when you come to tink of it.

We have not all the anwers, I think we are not even close, even worse, I think the religion of science is on the wrong path altogether.
 
Last edited:
shrubnose said:
Anyone who actually had it could put the lotteries out of business and that hasn't happened yet.

Think about that a little bit.
Click to expand...

well, no, Because it simply doesn't work that way.

This is kind of a circular reasoning, which, btw, most science is, circular reasoning.

It is the only way 'science' 'survives"

But rest assured, it is going down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom