- Joined
- Mar 28, 2018
- Messages
- 408
- Reaction score
- 68
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Does anyone have a database of earth temperatures?
When you googled that did you find a table of temperatures?
Of course.Does anyone have a database of earth temperatures?
There is no accurate database. At least not accurate enough to state anything reasonable concerning a few degrees of change.Does anyone have a database of earth temperatures?
Does anyone have a database of earth temperatures?
Interpreting 1901=57.3, 1902=57.5, 1903=57.5 is easy.Of course.
And if you had the necessary training to interpret them, you’d know where they are.
That link has charts. Do you know where a table of years/temperatures is?Global Temperature Data Sets: Overview & Comparison Table | Climate Data Guide
climatedataguide.ucar.edu
Someone actually gave you the data, and you can't even be bothered to put it in the format you want? Do your own homework.That link has charts. Do you know where a table of years/temperatures is?
Nobody gave me any data. What are you talking about?Someone actually gave you the data, and you can't even put it in the format you want? Do your own homework.
No- there are plenty of databases.Interpreting 1901=57.3, 1902=57.5, 1903=57.5 is easy.
But I still don't know where to find it.
Do you?
Or is being a smartass all you have?
A trend analysis on two data points is hard?No- there are plenty of databases.
Like I said…take some classes, read on the subject, and you’ll realize why putting data into untrained amateur hands is a recipe for terrible analysis.
Climate cultists dont have anything other than their usual false talking points.A trend analysis on two data points is hard?
Do you actually have a list of each year with its average temp?
There are several data sets.Nobody gave me any data. What are you talking about?
Earth means land or dirt. Why would you want the temperature of rocks ?Does anyone have a database of earth temperatures?
The land does not retain heat. The ocean does. And the ocean is the largest object on this planet, not the earth.Not only does water cover more than 70 percent of our planet's surface, it can also absorb large amounts of heat without a large increase in temperature. This tremendous ability to store and release heat over long periods of time gives the ocean a central role in stabilizing Earth's climate system.
Perhaps we should all agree that the temperature data sets represents the average air temperatureEarth means land or dirt. Why would you want the temperature of rocks ?
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-ocean-heat-content#:~:text=Not%20only%20does%20water%20cover,in%20stabilizing%20Earth's%20climate%20system.
The land does not retain heat. The ocean does. And the ocean is the largest object on this planet, not the earth.
I can see it’s over your head already.A trend analysis on two data points is hard?
Do you actually have a list of each year with its average temp?
I can see it’s over your head already.
We can. Not that it has any concern to the fact of the ocean acting as a heat dump.Perhaps we should all agree that the temperature data sets represents the average air temperature
as measured 2 meters off the ground.
Weather Talk: Temperature measured at 2 meters above ground
Why don't you just say you don't have the data instead of being assholes?I can see it’s over your head already.
Think for a second how the heat from the air enters the ocean. It is not happening in the infrared spectrum!We can. Not that it has any concern to the fact of the ocean acting as a heat dump.
I am sure this seems like clever science to you. Not to anyone else though.Think for a second how the heat from the air enters the ocean. It is not happening in the infrared spectrum!
Heat moves according to strict laws of thermodynamics. It is not clever, but follows the rules. The supposed response of added CO2 is an increase is downward longwave radiation, but longwave radiation only penetrates a few mm into the water.I am sure this seems like clever science to you. Not to anyone else though.
You really are ****ing useless when it comes to science. You actually think longwave is your only heat source. As usual you look to one shallow answer and are to lazy to do the research.Heat moves according to strict laws of thermodynamics. It is not clever, but follows the rules. The supposed response of added CO2 is an increase is downward longwave radiation, but longwave radiation only penetrates a few mm into the water.
No I think any response to added CO2 happens in the longwave spectrum!You really are ****ing useless when it comes to science. You actually think longwave is your only heat source. As usual you look to one shallow answer and are to lazy to do the research.