- Joined
- May 6, 2016
- Messages
- 1,908
- Reaction score
- 489
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Protectionism has existed in the past as a method of protecting a country's industries. This was very prominent as part of mercantilism which places emphasis on nations accumulating wealth.
Tariffs have played their role in American history; they used to be much higher than they are now. Until 1914, they were the federal government's main source of revenue.
https://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/tariff_history.png
Since the end of the Smoot Hawley tariff, tariffs in general have been in decline in the US. In 2017, the US had an average tariff rate of 1.66%. The EU was not much higher with 1.79%. Since the end of World War II, both parties have favored free trade. However, this has begun to change in the recent years with Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders having come out against job outsourcing. Back in the early 90s, independent candidate Ross Perot partly ran on opposition to NAFTA, referring to it as the giant sucking sound, whereas Bush and Clinton supported it. With Donald Trump in office, various tariffs have been enacted, most notably on solar panels and steel and aluminum.
All of this has led to a trade war between the US and China. In response to Trump's tariffs, China has enacted a tariff on soybeans which had a negative effect on soybean farmers. There are also concerns that the trade war will lead to a recession. If this happens, it will likely turn the American public against protectionism.
Walmart had an amazing business model to source products from third world countries with no labor laws and usually no human rights and reselling those products in the US. They also managed to put most smaller proprietorship businesses on main streets out of business.
It was an amazing wall street success story and it created some of the richest people in the world living within this country.
I personally could not be prouder of Walmart, our politicians and wall street for this amazing success story.
The anguish, agony and heart ship was spread out across so many communities that I honestly cannot get a good measure of that, so I will just ignore it.
When you read an article, ask yourself what the true source of this is? Corporations, Oligarchs and China wants free trade to continue because that is what is making them rich. Free trade is draining almost 1T dollars a year out of our economy and we are not asking why other countries are not buying, or WORSE YET STEALING our products and technologies to undermine us further.
Come of man, please at least ask why there is not fair trade!!!!
Walmart had an amazing business model to source products from third world countries with no labor laws and usually no human rights and reselling those products in the US. They also managed to put most smaller proprietorship businesses on main streets out of business.
It was an amazing wall street success story and it created some of the richest people in the world living within this country.
I personally could not be prouder of Walmart, our politicians and wall street for this amazing success story.
The anguish, agony and heart ship was spread out across so many communities that I honestly cannot get a good measure of that, so I will just ignore it.
When you read an article, ask yourself what the true source of this is? Corporations, Oligarchs and China wants free trade to continue because that is what is making them rich. Free trade is draining almost 1T dollars a year out of our economy and we are not asking why other countries are not buying, or WORSE YET STEALING our products and technologies to undermine us further.
Come of man, please at least ask why there is not fair trade!!!!
Do you support protectionism?
No. But I do support fair trade.
If a country abolishes common sense regulations solely to gain an unfair advantage, I have no problem with placing tarriffs on the relevant goods.
E.g. when a country takes a hatchet to environmental or worker safety codes, in order to provide their industry/agriculture with competitive advantages. I have zero problem with commensurate tarriffs being placed on such goods. Besides being ethically sound, this would also assist in developing common standards for global trade.
Care would have to be taken in order to prevent such a solution from degenerating into blatant protectionism, though. For one, I would oppose any efforts to centralize and codify definitions of what constituted "fair". Any such institution would be a prime target for corruption.
Then why didn't you vote for the second option?
Trump isn't using tariffs to protect our country's industries, ala Smoot Hawley. He's using tariffs as a stick to induce other countries to make deals that are to our benefit. For example, China has been committing the seven deadly sins to our detriment for almost 30 years. Of course, they don't want to stop. So Trump is whacking them over and over with his tariff stick...and it hurts them. A lot. So they have a choice...make a deal or keep getting hit.
Not to be a necromancer but how is the trade war going for the US? Is it bringing back jobs or is it hurting those sectors. Because from what I've been hearing on the news, it had a negative impact on soybean farmers.
Who do you think stopped the US from selling soybeans to China? (hint: it wasn't Trump)
In any case, the American soybean producers are still growing and exporting soybeans...just not as much to China. They are adapting.
Soybean exports decrease to China but increase to other countries.
Protectionism has existed in the past as a method of protecting a country's industries. This was very prominent as part of mercantilism which places emphasis on nations accumulating wealth.
Tariffs have played their role in American history; they used to be much higher than they are now. Until 1914, they were the federal government's main source of revenue.
https://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/tariff_history.png
Since the end of the Smoot Hawley tariff, tariffs in general have been in decline in the US. In 2017, the US had an average tariff rate of 1.66%. The EU was not much higher with 1.79%. Since the end of World War II, both parties have favored free trade. However, this has begun to change in the recent years with Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders having come out against job outsourcing. Back in the early 90s, independent candidate Ross Perot partly ran on opposition to NAFTA, referring to it as the giant sucking sound, whereas Bush and Clinton supported it. With Donald Trump in office, various tariffs have been enacted, most notably on solar panels and steel and aluminum.
All of this has led to a trade war between the US and China. In response to Trump's tariffs, China has enacted a tariff on soybeans which had a negative effect on soybean farmers. There are also concerns that the trade war will lead to a recession. If this happens, it will likely turn the American public against protectionism.
Yes, any sound economy shall be protectionist
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?