Mikkel said:yes, yes I do. I don't agree with everything she says or stands for, but I think that, becuase her son was a victim of the war, her opinion should carry some weight with the public.
Navy Pride said:Your thoughts please......
aps said:I support her antics because she reminds everyone about what a wasteful war this is.
Deegan said:Her son was a grown man, she has no right to anything, she did nothing but give birth to the man, that's it! He chose to go to war, he knew the consequences, and as an adult, he entered in to an agreement with the U.S military. If every mother who lost a son had as much air time, we would hear nothing but. As it stands, she already had more attention then most, she met with the president, was given his time, and was consoled by the most powerful man on the planet. Her 15 minutes are up, if she wants to protest fine, but she is using her son as catalyst for her new career, what a disgusting display of selfishness, he must be rolling in his grave!:roll:
Navy Pride said:At this point in this travesty it has very little to do with her sons death.......Its all about her blind political ambition, and judging by this poll so far it looks like some of our liberal friends would love to see her replace Feinstein in the Senate............I would love that to..............
DocAR said:I SO hope she does run.
Either way, one of the two of the most annoying women in politics will be gone.
That, folks, is a win/win situation for us all.
Stinger said:Why does that make her any smarter on foriegn policy and national security issues?
Interesting. I didn't know the 'right wing' put her on television night after night.Mikkel said:It's only the right wing that gives her all this attention anyway. If they hadn't made such a big deal over it, she would have gone away last year.
KCConservative said:Interesting. I didn't know the 'right wing' put her on television night after night.
I think she is milking the whole thing for fame.Parents appreciating the sacrifice their children made for this country is nothing spectacular to the left or appreciated by them,But a parent(notice that I did not say parents) who spits on the sacrafice her child made for this country is what the left(not even on the left but most of them) loves.Navy Pride said:Your thoughts please......
Saboteur said:Yes, I'll support anyone's protest antics in favor of keeping the right to protest!
Of course. Wouldn't you? Anybody have the right to make any claim or appeal. Now, if they act on it or cause others to act on it, then they get in trouble, of course. But speech itself is free.Navy Pride said:Just curious, would you support speech that advocated overthrow of our government by violent means?
steen said:Of course. Wouldn't you? Anybody have the right to make any claim or appeal. Now, if they act on it or cause others to act on it, then they get in trouble, of course. But speech itself is free.
Now, fascist, big-government-control-of-our-private-lives types may oppose this, but that is not surprising.
Perhaps you have some problems with comprehension or literacy? Advocating a person's right to free speech doesn't mean agreement with that speech.Navy Pride said:Well why don't you and your buddy Saboteur go out and protest advocating overthrow of the American government?
Talk is cheap...........:roll: