- Joined
- Dec 5, 2015
- Messages
- 28,611
- Reaction score
- 6,367
- Location
- Washington
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
From what I understand, Mueller's report was almost 500 pages. Really hard to adequately summarize that in 48 hours. But I'm sure Barr has been getting up to speed since the day he took office.
It's mostly just a continuous of the left's butt hurt since 2016, trix. As you know on that other forum we used to frequent and on this one the overriding sentiment of the left was that Mueller was going to ride out of the sunrise in full shining armor and deliver the proof that Trump stole the election from Maid Hilary whose trophy it rightfully was. And now, from their viewpoint :hitsfan: I wonder how our buddy over there is taking this. Suicide watch? :lol:Did congress get to decide if Ken Starr's report was on the up and up?
Just more whining from butt hurt leftists and Trump haters.
That's nonsense.
Most high school students have to read books that are 500 pages or longer in a weekend and have to provide a book report. It is fair to adequately summarize such a report in that amount of time.
That's nonsense.
Most high school students have to read books that are 500 pages or longer in a weekend and have to provide a book report. It is fair to adequately summarize such a report in that amount of time.
Did congress get to decide if Ken Starr's report was on the up and up?
Just more whining from butt hurt leftists and Trump haters.
Would love to see 'you' do that.
I accept it at face value but it leaves TONS of questions. Tons.
and when I say at face value I mean I know it is slanted in word for TRump, that is why he was appointed, but technicality within the bounds of law.
That's nonsense.
Most high school students have to read books that are 500 pages or longer in a weekend and have to provide a book report. It is fair to adequately summarize such a report in that amount of time.
The Barr Report, of course, being distinctly Barr's own four page summary of Mueller's report.
Do you accept the Barr Report at face value?
1. Yes, I have no reason to doubt it.
2. No, I'll wait on the Mueller Report, whenever that happens.
3. I don't know.
When did trump’s conned alt-Rightists stop smearing Mueller?
No, Because it seems Barr more or less rendered a a legal opinion or a prosecutorial decision in less than 48 hours about what I suspect is a voluminous report that took 2 years to put together. No, I'm sorry but Mr. Barr is going to have to do better that that.
It's actually "The Barr and Rosenstein Report". They worked together on it with help from Mueller, himself. Barr and Rosenstein also came to their obstruction conclusion together.
I have no reason to doubt it.
My god, how dumb can a post be.
Yes, I'm sure students have to read a 500 page legal document in a weekend and provide a book report.
Sheesh, this isn't about reading a work of fiction and coming up with a synopsis.
So if you truly believe Barr is covering for Trump do you likewise believe that democratic appointees have covered for other democrats in Congress, the democratic Presidents, the members of Obama's administration covered for Hillary. Or are you just so anti Trump you cant see the bad in the democrats?
It wasn't just Barr's summary but direct quotes from Mueller himself. Do you suspect Mueller of lying or not being able to evaluate his own work? That said, I still hope for there to be a bi-partisan review of the full report and a release of as much of the report as possible, for the sake of the country's peace of mind.
I'm guessing that you wouldn't trust me to take your arguments and summarize them faithfully, even if I did pepper that summary with the occasional direct quote from you.
Are you assuming that Mueller is prohibited from making a public statement to disavow the summary? In the face of that reality, your comment falls flat.
I believe that Mueller is indeed legally prohibited from speaking publicly about the investigation. I'm not sure if that same constraint applies to him answering questions in front of Congress.
He doesn't have to speak about the details of the investigation. He can speak about a mischaracterization of his summery or comments.
I believe that Mueller is indeed legally prohibited from speaking publicly about the investigation. I'm not sure if that same constraint applies to him answering questions in front of Congress.
I do hope a senate committee does bring in Mueller and question his investigation. For example did he look at both campaigns or only one. If only one,why when we know that Steele worked with Russians for his dossier. Did he investigate FISA abuses if not why not.
Something to consider: A close reading of William Barr’s summary of the Mueller report.
No.....until Barr presents the case against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Stroyk, Page, the Ohrs, Lynch, Obama, Hillary it was a waste.
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?