sbrettt
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2013
- Messages
- 2,724
- Reaction score
- 783
- Location
- Prospect park, PA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
This is a public poll.
This is a public poll.
Here's the catch. If video games cause violence... why is S. Korea and Japan, major gaming hubs, have very little violence.
Self-harm in relation to video games, on the other hand, is quite high over there.
You play goldeneye?Yes they do.
When I beat my friends at Goldeneye, occasionally they were so infuriated they took that three-pronged controller and smacked my leg with it.
Then I killed them some more! :mrgreen:
Here's the catch. If video games cause violence... why is S. Korea and Japan, major gaming hubs, have very little violence.
The south koreans should zerg one another and each other to get stronger on a daily basis. So no...
true... sedentary lifestyle.
You play goldeneye?
Whyyyyy?
Do you labor under the impression that every person in every different culture and social circumstance will respond the exact same way to the same stimulus?
Here's the catch. If video games cause violence... why is S. Korea and Japan, major gaming hubs, have very little violence.
The south koreans should zerg one another and each other to get stronger on a daily basis. So no...
Yes they do.
When I beat my friends at Goldeneye, occasionally they were so infuriated they took that three-pronged controller and smacked my leg with it.
Then I killed them some more! :mrgreen:
They do tend far more strongly to fantasy in gaming. GTA and CoD (and Goldeneye)don't sell **** over there.
I believe any media can desensitise one toward whatever they portray. This does not signal support for legislation to control it.
I was all about Pistols, Licence to Kill, Stack and no Oddjobs. Jaws meant you were an arrogant ****er. You?
Every study on the subject has showed no link, correlation or causation, between playing video games and actual violence. Just like with books, movies, TV shows, campfire stories, limericks, legends, or paintings. We depict violence because it exists around us. We do not enact it because we depict it.
They play starcraft, they should start eating one another.
Anyway. it's the same stimulus -> mass gaming culture.
The problem is the media... it "popularizes" these people. Also maybe a lot more things... who knows, i'm not a psychologist.
And if they produce a Hitler he can use Starcraft as a defence. The 1st/3rd person shooter phenomenon is a bit more personal when it comes to killing simulation. One can laugh at the idea of banning ****, I think it's unreasonable to think there's no connection between media and an individuals actions.
Its hard to find a famous historical killer who wasn't a fanboy for something in the arts.
Well let me tell you smth.
If you apply the same stimulus to multiple different systems, and some systems produce a non-harmful response... while others produce a very damaging response, then the problem doesn't lie with the stimulus, but with the system that are deficitary.
So you can't hold the stimulus responsible. Look at the cultures (the systems) and see what the problem is.
It could potentially cause people with mental issues to act out.
I am pretty sure that when GTA4 came out someone in Calgary who was high on something went on a car jacking spree, and rob a store or two, that he probably was playing GTA 4 quite a bit before hand.