• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do the United States of Obama even HAVE a Foreign Policy?


May 11, 2013
Reaction score
Political Leaning
By Dan Miller
September 17,2013

Ideology prevails, rather than the national interests of the United States. Ideology has prevailed in Syria and likely will in Iran and elsewhere.It's all a big clusterdunk.The following article from Stratfor provides a good summary of what President Obama's America did and did not do about Syria. As it contends, the concept of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) has deteriorated over the years. The threshold of mass destruction ceased to be the significant measure, and instead the cause of death in a given attack took center stage. The use of WMDs became a matter of ideological interpretation. Hence, the alleged killing of more than one hundred thousand by the Assad regime and by various “freedom fighters,” most of them apparently Islamists, over a couple of years. I have seen no breakout of — or even a distinction drawn based on — who did what to whom or why.



Read more:
Do the United States of Obama even have a Foreign Policy? | danmillerinpanama

To make the claim that Obama planned the outcome of the Syrian issue as it has turned out is completely brainwashed.
Top Bottom