- Joined
- Feb 15, 2019
- Messages
- 11,132
- Reaction score
- 1,592
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
If skinny white women don't prefer you, does that make you an incel...
Nah, the chubby girls get a shot.
If skinny white women don't prefer you, does that make you an incel...
I would say that any Asian boat person has already graduated college, so this is absurd. The only reason is bringing up a historical example is because he is judging racial groups as a whole.
You didn't know that sometimes "racist" is defined as "someone who disagrees with me"?
Some define it as someone who is white. Racism is an inherent character of our whiteness under critical race theory.
no one with an IQ above termite and a smidgen of honesty does eitherWell, that's a theory I don't buy.
are you unable to understand that discrimination based on RACE violates TITLE VII and in the case of state schools, the CONSTITUTION while discrimination based on NON-RACIAL reasons does not. Athletic recruits hurt Jews? Really? I guess it depends on the sport but I can think of dozens of top Jewish athletes who were collegiate superstars. And that is going back many years.
So just because of something an Asian person's parent did over fifty years ago, they are more entitled than a black person to an ivy league eduction? That doesn't make any damn sense for obvious reasons. You're judging people by their race as a whole and your stereotypes of that race as a whole.children of the boat people
I think that's specifically what you are doing.
Jews make up 2% of the US population. The teams I played on in College and coached while a grad student (squash) had far more than 2% Jewish representation. Two of the starters on the Yale Basketball team were Jewish. The Captain of the tennis team was Jewish. In fact, I bet more than 2% of Tennis All-Americans over the last 50 years were Jewish. Jewish fencers at Ivy league universities were common as well. The two top squash players at Yale during the mid seventies, Derrick Niederman and Robert Dinerman are Jewish. As was Harvard's legendary (60s), Victor Niederhoffer. Back when the US table tennis team was one of the best in the world, our leading players (Miles, Reisman, and Klein) were all Jewish as was our only singles world champion, Ruth Aarons.I understand Title VII, and I understand the absurd argument that you're trying to make. I also understand the history of discrimination when it comes to universities. See below. Athletic programs and Legacy Admissions were designed to discriminate towards Jewish people in the 1920s. I didn't say that Jewish people can't play sports. That's what racist people thought in the 1920s.
As for Legacy Admissions, 43% of the white students are legacy students, athletic admissions, or related to staff. That's the exact admission programs that were designed to discriminate towards Jews.
Study finds 43 percent of Harvard's white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff
The number drops dramatically for black, Latino and Asian American students with less than 16 percent each coming from those categories, the study said.www.nbcnews.com
Harvard's Jewish Problem
Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org
Nativism and intolerance among segments of the white Protestant population were aimed at both Eastern European Jews and Southern European Catholics. In higher education, Jews were particularly resented. By 1919, about 80% of the students at New York's Hunter and City colleges were Jews, and 40% at Columbia. Jews at Harvard tripled to 21% of the freshman class in 1922 from about 7% in 1900. Ivy League Jews won a disproportionate share of academic prizes and election to Phi Beta Kappa but were widely regarded as competitive, eager to excel academically and less interested in extra-curricular activities such as organized sports. Non-Jews accused them of being clannish, socially unskilled and either unwilling or unable to“fit in.”
you are lying. I am noting that poor Asian kids whose parents came here with nothing, but still who managed to make top grades, should not be passed over at top schools in favor of blacks-who had far more comfortable backgrounds, but failed to achieve the same GPAs or ACT/SAT scoresSo just because of something an Asian person's parent did over fifty years ago, they are more entitled than a black person to an ivy league eduction? That doesn't make any damn sense for obvious reasons. You're judging people by their race as a whole and your stereotypes of that race as a whole.
No because exclusion isn't racism. If you are attracted to certain physical or personality features and exclude people from the dating pool because you are not attracted to them, then that is not racism. If you exclude them because you believe they are lesser than you, then that is racism. You are actually defending my position rather than arguing against it.So if I prefer skinny white women for dating I am a racist?
The many did not set the past or current application rules that Colleges used to determine acceptance of the applicants. There is only one way to secure equality for all applicants... There should be no questions concerning race, gender, name, parentage, politics or any other personal information about the applicants. Colleges should simply use all of the applicants academic records via all of the learning institutions they attended. Note: To ensure complete equality for all applicants...The names, locations or any information that identifies the institutions attended should be redacted. imho Roseann
you are lying. I am noting that poor Asian kids whose parents came here with nothing, but still who managed to make top grades, should not be passed over at top schools in favor of blacks-who had far more comfortable backgrounds, but failed to achieve the same GPAs or ACT/SAT scores
Do you support veterans' preferences that many federal agencies use?The trust fund and alum crowd are all for total equality- as long as it doesn't apply to them....
stop your stupid lies about what I have said. You constantly make up crap and try to attribute it to me. Should private schools have to ignore ability to pay?Quit pretending you care about equality...
You use it to bash one race with another. Fact is true equality would have the wealthy and alum being judged not for their father or trust fund by solely on merit. The Richie Rich crowd already benefit from expensive prep classes and schools- last resort can pay thousands to hundred of thousands to bribe their way in.
Simple level playing field- true equality and not feudal divine right... ✌
It seems like you switched from talking about authoritarians to talking about "domestics," and I don't really know what you mean by that. I guess you're trying to say that there is no different between authoritarianism and "domestic terrorists," but there are differences. Not all terrorists are authoritarian, and not all authoritarians are terrorists.
What you said in the bold, makes absolutely no sense. Ethno state authoritarian systems like Nazi Germany targeted other races, especially Jewish people, for extermination and total annihilation. The German people were not subhuman in Nazi Germany. It's the same in every ethno based uprising and Civil War. The Serbs did not set up rape camps and concentration camps targeting Serb people. They never did to their own people. The Turks didn't death march the Turks into the dessert. They targeted only Armenias.
Do you not understand ethnic genocide and racism at all?
Not sure why it is you would think that reasserting the same ridiculous notion you had posited before would make it any less ridiculous than the first attempt . I don't think you even understand the meaning of the term "exclusion".You don't reach equal opportunity by exclusion.
Enslaved blacks built the White House, Capitol, and the rest of pre-bellum DC. My mother's Yankee ancestors arrived from England by the 1630s. They owned slaves in the state of CT at least until Adams succeeded Washington. Nobody split Asian families on an auction block. The Irish and Chinese who labored on the transcontinental railroad had the option of seeking other work.so lets think this through. You are the first generation Vietnamese or Chinese or whatever and your parents made huge sacrifices coming here to the USA. And they teach you the way to succeed is to bust your ass in school. And you do and you make a 4.0 and get very good ACT scores. But you aren't a favored affirmative action race and some black gets into say Stanford ahead of you even though they came from a more wealthy background and have scores way below yours. That happened all the time when I was in college. NOW WHAT DOES THAT TEACH PEOPLE? hard work and academic success really isn't that important-being a favored race is? I am curious, what school are you talking about? When I was applying to the big name law and graduate schools, there were several where there was not a single black who scored higher than ANY of the accepted whites and was often well below many whites who were rejected.
Seems racism is getting a full-throated defense under disguise of equality. Man, Right Wingers really do call piss rain.
In higher education, Jews were particularly resented. By 1919, about 80% of the students at New York's Hunter and City colleges were Jews, and 40% at Columbia. Jews at Harvard tripled to 21% of the freshman class in 1922 from about 7% in 1900. Ivy League Jews won a disproportionate share of academic prizes and election to Phi Beta Kappa but were widely regarded as competitive, eager to excel academically and less interested in extra-curricular activities such as organized sports. Non-Jews accused them of being clannish, socially unskilled and either unwilling or unable to“fit in.”
Racism should not be hard to understand and easy to identify, but apparently it is for some.Please define " racism". Then that is your definition - who's definition do we use? Or is it a sliding scale kind of definition.
Want to call piss rain? Explain how one demographic can freely use the "n" word without recourse but let any other demographic use it and it is deemed hate speech.
Are we going to have Orwellian 1984 equality? All are equal - just some are more equal than others.
Please define " racism". Then that is your definition - who's definition do we use? Or is it a sliding scale kind of definition.
Want to call piss rain? Explain how one demographic can freely use the "n" word without recourse but let any other demographic use it and it is deemed hate speech.
Are we going to have Orwellian 1984 equality? All are equal - just some are more equal than others.